• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中荷城市公园偏好比较研究。

A Comparative Study of Urban Park Preferences in China and The Netherlands.

机构信息

Urban Systems and Real Estate Unit, Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8):4632. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084632.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19084632
PMID:35457506
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9027594/
Abstract

Urban parks play an important role in tackling several urban challenges such as air pollution, urban heat, physical inactivity, social isolation, and stress. In order to fully seize the benefits of urban parks, it is important that they are attractive for various groups of residents. While several studies have investigated residents' preferences for urban park attributes, most of them have focused on a single geographical context. This study aimed to investigate differences in park preferences, specifically between Dutch and Chinese park users. We collected data in the Netherlands and China using an online stated choice experiment with videos of virtual parks. The data were analyzed with a random parameter mixed logit model to identify differences in preferences for park attributes between Chinese and Dutch citizens, controlling for personal characteristics. Although the results showed a general preference for parks with many trees, several differences were found between the Dutch and Chinese respondents. These differences concerned vegetation (composition of trees and flowers), the presence of benches and play facilities, and could probably be explained by differences in park use, values of nature, and landscape preferences. The findings of this study can be used as design guidelines by urban planners and landscape designers to design attractive and inclusive parks for different target groups.

摘要

城市公园在应对空气污染、城市热岛、缺乏身体活动、社会隔离和压力等多个城市挑战方面发挥着重要作用。为了充分利用城市公园的好处,重要的是它们对各个居民群体具有吸引力。虽然有几项研究调查了居民对城市公园属性的偏好,但大多数研究都集中在单一的地理背景下。本研究旨在调查公园偏好的差异,特别是荷兰和中国公园使用者之间的差异。我们在中国和荷兰使用在线虚拟公园视频的陈述选择实验收集数据。使用随机参数混合逻辑模型分析数据,以确定中国和荷兰公民对公园属性的偏好差异,同时控制个人特征。尽管结果表明人们普遍偏爱树木多的公园,但在荷兰和中国受访者之间还是发现了一些差异。这些差异涉及植被(树木和花卉的组成)、长凳和游乐设施的存在,这些差异可能可以用公园使用、自然价值观和景观偏好的差异来解释。本研究的结果可被城市规划者和景观设计师用作设计指南,为不同目标群体设计有吸引力和包容性的公园。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b3e/9027594/77f2b2d0bec6/ijerph-19-04632-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b3e/9027594/a7fddcb988c1/ijerph-19-04632-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b3e/9027594/3d538eaa2c2b/ijerph-19-04632-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b3e/9027594/77f2b2d0bec6/ijerph-19-04632-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b3e/9027594/a7fddcb988c1/ijerph-19-04632-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b3e/9027594/3d538eaa2c2b/ijerph-19-04632-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b3e/9027594/77f2b2d0bec6/ijerph-19-04632-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comparative Study of Urban Park Preferences in China and The Netherlands.中荷城市公园偏好比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8):4632. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084632.
2
The Influence of Urban Park Attributes on User Preferences: Evaluation of Virtual Parks in an Online Stated-Choice Experiment.城市公园属性对用户偏好的影响:在线选择实验中虚拟公园的评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 30;18(1):212. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010212.
3
Vegetation management for urban park visitors: a mixed methods approach in Portland, Oregon.城市公园游客的植被管理:俄勒冈州波特兰市的混合方法研究。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Jun;30(4):e02079. doi: 10.1002/eap.2079. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
4
Mechanisms Underlying the Effects of Landscape Features of Urban Community Parks on Health-Related Feelings of Users.城市社区公园景观特征对使用者健康感受影响的作用机制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 26;18(15):7888. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157888.
5
Residents' Spatial Preference for Urban Forest Park Route during Physical Activities.居民在进行体育活动时对城市森林公园路径的空间偏好。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 9;18(22):11756. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211756.
6
Factors Affecting Users' Satisfaction with Urban Parks through Online Comments Data: Evidence from Shenzhen, China.基于在线评论数据的城市公园用户满意度影响因素研究——以中国深圳为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 31;18(1):253. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010253.
7
Active use and perceptions of parks as urban assets for physical activity: A mixed-methods study.积极利用公园作为城市资产促进身体活动:一项混合方法研究。
Health Place. 2021 Sep;71:102660. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102660. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
8
Revealing disparities in different types of park visits based on cellphone signaling data in Guangzhou, China.基于中国广州手机信号数据揭示不同类型公园游览的差异。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb;351:119969. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119969. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
9
Usage behavior and health benefit perception of youth in urban parks: A case study from Qingdao, China.城市公园中青少年的使用行为和健康效益感知:来自中国青岛的案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;10:923671. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.923671. eCollection 2022.
10
Investigating the Usage Patterns of Park Visitors and Their Driving Factors to Improve Urban Community Parks in China: Taking Jinan City as an Example.调查公园游客的使用模式及其驱动因素,以改善中国城市社区公园:以济南市为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;19(23):15504. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315504.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the Usage Patterns of Park Visitors and Their Driving Factors to Improve Urban Community Parks in China: Taking Jinan City as an Example.调查公园游客的使用模式及其驱动因素,以改善中国城市社区公园:以济南市为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;19(23):15504. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315504.
2
Considering Farmers' Heterogeneity to Payment Ecosystem Services Participation: A Choice Experiment and Agent-Based Model Analysis in Xin'an River Basin, China.考虑农民对支付生态系统服务参与的异质性:以中国新安河流域为例的选择实验和基于主体模型分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 11;19(12):7190. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127190.

本文引用的文献

1
The Influence of Urban Park Attributes on User Preferences: Evaluation of Virtual Parks in an Online Stated-Choice Experiment.城市公园属性对用户偏好的影响:在线选择实验中虚拟公园的评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 30;18(1):212. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010212.
2
A Multi-Level Path Analysis of the Relationships between the Momentary Experience Characteristics, Satisfaction with Urban Public Spaces, and Momentary- and Long-Term Subjective Wellbeing.多层面路径分析城市公共空间体验特征、满意度与即时和长期主观幸福感的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 26;16(19):3621. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193621.
3
Factors associated with changes in subjective well-being immediately after urban park visit.
城市公园游览后主观幸福感即刻变化的相关因素。
Int J Environ Health Res. 2020 Apr;30(2):134-145. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2019.1577368. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
4
The Urban Forest and Ecosystem Services: Impacts on Urban Water, Heat, and Pollution Cycles at the Tree, Street, and City Scale.城市森林与生态系统服务:在树木、街道和城市尺度上对城市水、热及污染循环的影响
J Environ Qual. 2016 Jan;45(1):119-24. doi: 10.2134/jeq2015.11.0567.
5
Perception and attitude of residents toward urban green spaces in Guangzhou (China).中国广州居民对城市绿地的认知与态度
Environ Manage. 2006 Sep;38(3):338-49. doi: 10.1007/s00267-005-0166-6.
6
Global urbanization and impact on health.全球城市化及其对健康的影响。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2003 Aug;206(4-5):269-78. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00223.