• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cognitive Bias and Diagnostic Errors among Physicians in Japan: A Self-Reflection Survey.日本医生认知偏差与诊断错误:自我反思调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8):4645. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084645.
2
Japanese Internists' Most Memorable Diagnostic Error Cases: A Self-reflection Survey.日本内科医生最难忘的诊断错误案例:自我反思调查。
Intern Med. 2024 Jan 15;63(2):221-229. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1494-22. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
3
Cognitive biases encountered by physicians in the emergency room.急诊室医生遇到的认知偏差。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 26;22(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00708-3.
4
The Big Three diagnostic errors through reflections of Japanese internists.日本内科医生反思的三大诊断错误。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Mar 20;11(3):273-282. doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0131. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.
5
Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review.与医疗决策相关的认知偏差:一项系统综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0377-1.
6
Cognitive Biases in Emergency Physicians: A Pilot Study.急诊医生的认知偏差:一项初步研究。
J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;57(2):168-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.03.048. Epub 2019 May 22.
7
Seen through their eyes: residents' reflections on the cognitive and contextual components of diagnostic errors in medicine.从他们的视角看问题:住院医师对医学诊断错误的认知和背景因素的反思。
Acad Med. 2012 Oct;87(10):1361-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826742c9.
8
Role of knowledge and reasoning processes as predictors of resident physicians' susceptibility to anchoring bias in diagnostic reasoning: a randomised controlled experiment.知识和推理过程在预测住院医师诊断推理中易受锚定偏差影响的作用:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Aug 16;33(9):563-572. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016621.
9
Cognitive diagnostic error in internal medicine.内科认知诊断错误。
Eur J Intern Med. 2013 Sep;24(6):525-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
10
Cognitive Bias Impact on Management of Postoperative Complications, Medical Error, and Standard of Care.认知偏差对术后并发症管理、医疗差错和医疗标准的影响。
J Surg Res. 2021 Feb;258:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.040. Epub 2020 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Delay in Surgery for Ruptured Aortic Aneurysm in Hemodynamically Stable Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.血流动力学稳定的主动脉瘤破裂患者手术延迟:一项多中心回顾性分析。
Cureus. 2025 Aug 3;17(8):e89294. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89294. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Low-Energy Trauma: Severe Liver Injury in an Elderly Patient from a Seated Fall.低能量创伤:一名老年患者因坐位跌倒导致严重肝损伤。
Am J Case Rep. 2024 Dec 27;25:e946094. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.946094.
3
Students and physicians differ in perception of quality of life in patients with tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract.学生和医生对患有上消化道肿瘤患者的生活质量认知存在差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 24;14(1):9460. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59350-7.
4
Effects of a 60-Minute Lecture About Diagnostic Errors for Medical Students: A Single-Center Interventional Study.一场面向医学生的60分钟诊断错误讲座的效果:一项单中心干预性研究。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 13;16(3):e56117. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56117. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Japanese Internists' Most Memorable Diagnostic Error Cases: A Self-reflection Survey.日本内科医生最难忘的诊断错误案例:自我反思调查。
Intern Med. 2024 Jan 15;63(2):221-229. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1494-22. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
6
A Case of Panic Disorder Misdiagnosed as Epilepsy for 9 Years in a Young Male.一名青年男性惊恐障碍被误诊为癫痫9年的病例。
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2023 Apr-Jun;11(2):175-177. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_313_22. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
7
Cognitive biases encountered by physicians in the emergency room.急诊室医生遇到的认知偏差。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 26;22(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00708-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic Excellence Through the Lens of Patient-Centeredness.以患者为中心视角下的卓越诊断。
JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2127-2128. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.19513.
2
Diagnostic Excellence.卓越诊断。
JAMA. 2021 Nov 16;326(19):1905-1906. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.19493.
3
'More than words' - Interpersonal communication, cognitive bias and diagnostic errors.“言外之意”——人际沟通、认知偏差与诊断错误。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jan;105(1):252-256. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.012. Epub 2021 May 12.
4
COVID Blindness: Delayed Diagnosis of Aseptic Meningitis in the COVID-19 Era.新冠致盲:新冠疫情时代无菌性脑膜炎的延迟诊断
Eur J Case Rep Intern Med. 2020 Oct 23;7(11):001940. doi: 10.12890/2020_001940. eCollection 2020.
5
Diagnosing, fast and slow.诊断,快与慢。
Postgrad Med J. 2021 Feb;97(1144):103-109. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-137412. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
6
A survey of outpatient Internal Medicine clinician perceptions of diagnostic error.一项关于门诊内科临床医生对诊断错误认知的调查。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 May 26;7(2):107-114. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0070.
7
The Impact of Cognitive and Implicit Bias on Patient Safety and Quality.认知和隐性偏见对患者安全与质量的影响。
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019 Feb;52(1):35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
8
Cognitive bias in clinical medicine.临床医学中的认知偏差。
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2018 Sep;48(3):225-232. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2018.306.
9
Cognitive error in an academic emergency department.学术性急诊科中的认知错误。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2018 Sep 25;5(3):135-142. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0011.
10
Cognitive Autopsy: A Transformative Group Approach to Mitigate Cognitive Bias.认知尸检:一种减轻认知偏差的变革性群体方法。
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Jun;10(3):345-347. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00884.1.

日本医生认知偏差与诊断错误:自我反思调查。

Cognitive Bias and Diagnostic Errors among Physicians in Japan: A Self-Reflection Survey.

机构信息

General Medicine Center, Shimane University Hospital, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.

Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8):4645. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084645.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19084645
PMID:35457511
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9032995/
Abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed to clarify how cognitive biases and situational factors related to diagnostic errors among physicians. A self-reflection questionnaire survey on physicians' most memorable diagnostic error cases was conducted at seven conferences: one each in Okayama, Hiroshima, Matsue, Izumo City, and Osaka, and two in Tokyo. Among the 147 recruited participants, 130 completed and returned the questionnaires. We recruited primary care physicians working in various specialty areas and settings (e.g., clinics and hospitals). Results indicated that the emergency department was the most common setting (47.7%), and the highest frequency of errors occurred during night-time work. An average of 3.08 cognitive biases was attributed to each error. The participants reported anchoring bias (60.0%), premature closure (58.5%), availability bias (46.2%), and hassle bias (33.1%), with the first three being most frequent. Further, multivariate logistic regression analysis for cognitive bias showed that emergency room care can easily induce cognitive bias (adjusted odds ratio 3.96, 95% CI 1.16-13.6, -value = 0.028). Although limited to a certain extent by its sample collection, due to the sensitive nature of information regarding physicians' diagnostic errors, this study nonetheless shows correlations with environmental factors (emergency room care situations) that induce cognitive biases which, in turn, cause diagnostic errors.

摘要

这项横断面研究旨在阐明认知偏差和情境因素如何与医生的诊断错误相关。在七个会议上对医生最难忘的诊断错误案例进行了自我反思问卷调查:冈山、广岛、松江、出云市和大阪各一次,东京两次。在招募的 147 名参与者中,有 130 名完成并返回了问卷。我们招募了在各种专业领域和环境(如诊所和医院)工作的初级保健医生。结果表明,急诊室是最常见的环境(47.7%),错误发生的频率最高是在夜间工作时。每个错误平均归因于 3.08 个认知偏差。参与者报告了锚定偏差(60.0%)、过早封闭(58.5%)、可得性偏差(46.2%)和麻烦偏差(33.1%),前三个是最常见的。此外,对认知偏差的多变量逻辑回归分析表明,急诊护理容易引起认知偏差(调整后的优势比 3.96,95%CI 1.16-13.6,-值=0.028)。尽管由于信息收集的敏感性和样本数量有限,本研究受到一定限制,但它仍显示出与环境因素(急诊护理情况)的相关性,这些因素会引起认知偏差,从而导致诊断错误。