Suppr超能文献

日本医生认知偏差与诊断错误:自我反思调查。

Cognitive Bias and Diagnostic Errors among Physicians in Japan: A Self-Reflection Survey.

机构信息

General Medicine Center, Shimane University Hospital, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.

Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8):4645. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084645.

Abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed to clarify how cognitive biases and situational factors related to diagnostic errors among physicians. A self-reflection questionnaire survey on physicians' most memorable diagnostic error cases was conducted at seven conferences: one each in Okayama, Hiroshima, Matsue, Izumo City, and Osaka, and two in Tokyo. Among the 147 recruited participants, 130 completed and returned the questionnaires. We recruited primary care physicians working in various specialty areas and settings (e.g., clinics and hospitals). Results indicated that the emergency department was the most common setting (47.7%), and the highest frequency of errors occurred during night-time work. An average of 3.08 cognitive biases was attributed to each error. The participants reported anchoring bias (60.0%), premature closure (58.5%), availability bias (46.2%), and hassle bias (33.1%), with the first three being most frequent. Further, multivariate logistic regression analysis for cognitive bias showed that emergency room care can easily induce cognitive bias (adjusted odds ratio 3.96, 95% CI 1.16-13.6, -value = 0.028). Although limited to a certain extent by its sample collection, due to the sensitive nature of information regarding physicians' diagnostic errors, this study nonetheless shows correlations with environmental factors (emergency room care situations) that induce cognitive biases which, in turn, cause diagnostic errors.

摘要

这项横断面研究旨在阐明认知偏差和情境因素如何与医生的诊断错误相关。在七个会议上对医生最难忘的诊断错误案例进行了自我反思问卷调查:冈山、广岛、松江、出云市和大阪各一次,东京两次。在招募的 147 名参与者中,有 130 名完成并返回了问卷。我们招募了在各种专业领域和环境(如诊所和医院)工作的初级保健医生。结果表明,急诊室是最常见的环境(47.7%),错误发生的频率最高是在夜间工作时。每个错误平均归因于 3.08 个认知偏差。参与者报告了锚定偏差(60.0%)、过早封闭(58.5%)、可得性偏差(46.2%)和麻烦偏差(33.1%),前三个是最常见的。此外,对认知偏差的多变量逻辑回归分析表明,急诊护理容易引起认知偏差(调整后的优势比 3.96,95%CI 1.16-13.6,-值=0.028)。尽管由于信息收集的敏感性和样本数量有限,本研究受到一定限制,但它仍显示出与环境因素(急诊护理情况)的相关性,这些因素会引起认知偏差,从而导致诊断错误。

相似文献

3
Cognitive biases encountered by physicians in the emergency room.急诊室医生遇到的认知偏差。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 26;22(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00708-3.
4
The Big Three diagnostic errors through reflections of Japanese internists.日本内科医生反思的三大诊断错误。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Mar 20;11(3):273-282. doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0131. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.
6
Cognitive Biases in Emergency Physicians: A Pilot Study.急诊医生的认知偏差:一项初步研究。
J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;57(2):168-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.03.048. Epub 2019 May 22.
9
Cognitive diagnostic error in internal medicine.内科认知诊断错误。
Eur J Intern Med. 2013 Sep;24(6):525-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

6
A Case of Panic Disorder Misdiagnosed as Epilepsy for 9 Years in a Young Male.一名青年男性惊恐障碍被误诊为癫痫9年的病例。
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2023 Apr-Jun;11(2):175-177. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_313_22. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
7
Cognitive biases encountered by physicians in the emergency room.急诊室医生遇到的认知偏差。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 26;22(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00708-3.

本文引用的文献

2
Diagnostic Excellence.卓越诊断。
JAMA. 2021 Nov 16;326(19):1905-1906. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.19493.
4
COVID Blindness: Delayed Diagnosis of Aseptic Meningitis in the COVID-19 Era.新冠致盲:新冠疫情时代无菌性脑膜炎的延迟诊断
Eur J Case Rep Intern Med. 2020 Oct 23;7(11):001940. doi: 10.12890/2020_001940. eCollection 2020.
5
Diagnosing, fast and slow.诊断,快与慢。
Postgrad Med J. 2021 Feb;97(1144):103-109. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-137412. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
7
The Impact of Cognitive and Implicit Bias on Patient Safety and Quality.认知和隐性偏见对患者安全与质量的影响。
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019 Feb;52(1):35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
8
Cognitive bias in clinical medicine.临床医学中的认知偏差。
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2018 Sep;48(3):225-232. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2018.306.
9
Cognitive error in an academic emergency department.学术性急诊科中的认知错误。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2018 Sep 25;5(3):135-142. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0011.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验