• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊室医生遇到的认知偏差。

Cognitive biases encountered by physicians in the emergency room.

机构信息

Department of General Medicine, Kumamoto Medical Center, Kumamoto, Japan.

Department of General Medicine, Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 26;22(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00708-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12873-022-00708-3
PMID:36028810
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9414136/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic errors constitute an important medical safety problem that needs improvement, and their frequency and severity are high in emergency room settings. Previous studies have suggested that diagnostic errors occur in 0.6-12% of first-time patients in the emergency room and that one or more cognitive factors are involved in 96% of these cases. This study aimed to identify the types of cognitive biases experienced by physicians in emergency rooms in Japan.

METHODS

We conducted a questionnaire survey using Nikkei Medical Online (Internet) from January 21 to January 31, 2019. Of the 159,519 physicians registered with Nikkei Medical Online when the survey was administered, those who volunteered their most memorable diagnostic error cases in the emergency room participated in the study. EZR was used for the statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 387 physicians were included. The most common cognitive biases were overconfidence (22.5%), confirmation (21.2%), availability (12.4%), and anchoring (11.4%). Of the error cases, the top five most common initial diagnoses were upper gastrointestinal disease (22.7%), trauma (14.7%), cardiovascular disease (10.9%), respiratory disease (7.5%), and primary headache (6.5%). The corresponding final diagnoses for these errors were intestinal obstruction or peritonitis (27.3%), overlooked traumas (47.4%), other cardiovascular diseases (66.7%), cardiovascular disease (41.4%), and stroke (80%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A comparison of the initial and final diagnoses of cases with diagnostic errors shows that there were more cases with diagnostic errors caused by overlooking another disease in the same organ or a disease in a closely related organ.

摘要

背景

诊断错误是一个重要的医疗安全问题,需要加以改善,在急诊环境中,其频率和严重程度都很高。先前的研究表明,在急诊首次就诊的患者中,有 0.6%至 12%的患者会出现诊断错误,其中 96%的病例涉及一个或多个认知因素。本研究旨在确定日本急诊医生所经历的认知偏差类型。

方法

我们于 2019 年 1 月 21 日至 1 月 31 日通过 Nikkei Medical Online(互联网)进行了问卷调查。在进行调查时,Nikkei Medical Online 注册的 159519 名医生中,有自愿报告急诊室最难忘的诊断错误病例的医生参与了研究。使用 EZR 进行统计分析。

结果

共有 387 名医生入选。最常见的认知偏差包括过度自信(22.5%)、确认偏差(21.2%)、可得性偏差(12.4%)和锚定偏差(11.4%)。在这些错误病例中,初始诊断最常见的前五种疾病是上消化道疾病(22.7%)、创伤(14.7%)、心血管疾病(10.9%)、呼吸道疾病(7.5%)和原发性头痛(6.5%)。这些错误的相应最终诊断分别为肠梗阻或腹膜炎(27.3%)、漏诊创伤(47.4%)、其他心血管疾病(66.7%)、心血管疾病(41.4%)和中风(80%)。

结论

将诊断错误病例的初始和最终诊断进行比较,结果表明,由于忽略同一器官的另一种疾病或密切相关器官的疾病而导致的诊断错误病例更多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5abc/9414136/49fb8090f08a/12873_2022_708_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5abc/9414136/5bb42e673adf/12873_2022_708_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5abc/9414136/3c79d935efaf/12873_2022_708_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5abc/9414136/9cbf56fa7cc4/12873_2022_708_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5abc/9414136/49fb8090f08a/12873_2022_708_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5abc/9414136/5bb42e673adf/12873_2022_708_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5abc/9414136/3c79d935efaf/12873_2022_708_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5abc/9414136/9cbf56fa7cc4/12873_2022_708_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5abc/9414136/49fb8090f08a/12873_2022_708_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cognitive biases encountered by physicians in the emergency room.急诊室医生遇到的认知偏差。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 26;22(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00708-3.
2
Cognitive Bias and Diagnostic Errors among Physicians in Japan: A Self-Reflection Survey.日本医生认知偏差与诊断错误:自我反思调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8):4645. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084645.
3
Medical Malpractice and Diagnostic Errors in Japanese Emergency Departments.日本急诊部的医疗事故和诊断错误。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 20;24(2):340-347. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.11.55738.
4
Japanese Internists' Most Memorable Diagnostic Error Cases: A Self-reflection Survey.日本内科医生最难忘的诊断错误案例:自我反思调查。
Intern Med. 2024 Jan 15;63(2):221-229. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1494-22. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
5
Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review.与医疗决策相关的认知偏差:一项系统综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0377-1.
6
The Big Three diagnostic errors through reflections of Japanese internists.日本内科医生反思的三大诊断错误。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Mar 20;11(3):273-282. doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0131. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.
7
Seen through their eyes: residents' reflections on the cognitive and contextual components of diagnostic errors in medicine.从他们的视角看问题:住院医师对医学诊断错误的认知和背景因素的反思。
Acad Med. 2012 Oct;87(10):1361-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826742c9.
8
Cognitive diagnostic error in internal medicine.内科认知诊断错误。
Eur J Intern Med. 2013 Sep;24(6):525-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
9
Teaching Critical Thinking: A Case for Instruction in Cognitive Biases to Reduce Diagnostic Errors and Improve Patient Safety.教授批判性思维:以认知偏差教学减少诊断错误和提高患者安全的案例。
Acad Med. 2019 Feb;94(2):187-194. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002518.
10
Cognitive Biases in Emergency Physicians: A Pilot Study.急诊医生的认知偏差:一项初步研究。
J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;57(2):168-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.03.048. Epub 2019 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Concorde Syndrome in the Treatment of People with Cancer: Validation of a Measurement Instrument.癌症患者治疗中的协和综合征:一种测量工具的验证
Int J Behav Med. 2025 Sep 17. doi: 10.1007/s12529-025-10392-9.
2
Evaluating the o1 reasoning large language model for cognitive bias: a vignette study.评估用于认知偏差的o1推理大语言模型:一项 vignette 研究。
Crit Care. 2025 Aug 21;29(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05591-5.
3
Evaluating the Impact on Pain Perceptions, Pain Intensity, and Physical Activity of a Mobile App to Empower Employees With Musculoskeletal Pain: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive Bias and Diagnostic Errors among Physicians in Japan: A Self-Reflection Survey.日本医生认知偏差与诊断错误:自我反思调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8):4645. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084645.
2
Barriers to diagnostic error reduction in Japan.日本减少诊断错误的障碍。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 Jun 30;12(1):138-140. doi: 10.1515/dx-2021-0055. eCollection 2025 Feb 1.
3
Analysis of diagnostic error cases among Japanese residents using diagnosis error evaluation and research taxonomy.使用诊断错误评估与研究分类法对日本居民中的诊断错误病例进行分析。
评估一款旨在帮助患有肌肉骨骼疼痛的员工的移动应用程序对疼痛感知、疼痛强度和身体活动的影响:混合方法试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 27;9:e67886. doi: 10.2196/67886.
4
Acute patients discharged without an established diagnosis: risk of mortality and readmission of nonspecific diagnoses compared to disease-specific diagnoses.急性病患者出院时未明确诊断:与特定疾病诊断相比,非特异性诊断的死亡率和再入院风险。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 19;32(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01191-4.
5
Residents need competence not confidence: A retrospective evaluation of the new competency education program for Korean neurology residents.住院医师需要的是能力而非自信:对韩国神经科住院医师新能力教育计划的回顾性评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0290503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290503. eCollection 2023.
6
For Medical Directors: Case Report of a Missed Wooden Foreign Body in the Forehead.致医疗主任:一例前额木质异物漏诊的病例报告
Cureus. 2023 May 9;15(5):e38790. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38790. eCollection 2023 May.
J Gen Fam Med. 2021 Jan 4;22(2):96-99. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.388. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Review of the Basics of Cognitive Error in Emergency Medicine: Still No Easy Answers.急诊医学中认知错误基础的回顾:仍无简单答案。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Nov 2;21(6):125-131. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.7.47832.
5
Cognitive bias in emergency medicine.急诊医学中的认知偏差。
Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Oct;32(5):852-855. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13622. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
6
Factors and impact of physicians' diagnostic errors in malpractice claims in Japan.日本医疗事故诉讼中医师诊断错误的因素和影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 3;15(8):e0237145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237145. eCollection 2020.
7
Rate of diagnostic errors and serious misdiagnosis-related harms for major vascular events, infections, and cancers: toward a national incidence estimate using the "Big Three".主要血管事件、感染和癌症的诊断错误率和严重误诊相关危害:使用“三大”方法估算全国发病率。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 May 14;8(1):67-84. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0104. Print 2021 Feb 23.
8
Misdiagnosis and failure to diagnose in emergency care: Causes and empathy as a solution.急诊医疗中的误诊和漏诊:原因和同理心作为解决方案。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Aug;103(8):1650-1656. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.02.039. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
9
Epiphyseal Stress Fractures of the Fingers in an Adolescent Climber: A Potential "Maslow's Hammer" in Terms of Clinical Reasoning.一名青少年攀岩者手指的骨骺应力性骨折:从临床推理角度看一种潜在的“马斯洛之锤”
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2019 Dec;18(12):431-433. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000658.
10
Cognitive Biases in Emergency Physicians: A Pilot Study.急诊医生的认知偏差:一项初步研究。
J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;57(2):168-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.03.048. Epub 2019 May 22.