Sports & Musculoskeletal System Research Group (RAQUIS), University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, 30120 Murcia, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8):4655. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084655.
The Cobb angle value is a critical parameter for evaluating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. This study aimed to evaluate a software’s validity and absolute reliability to determine the Cobb angle in AIS digital X-rays, with two different degrees of experienced observers. Four experts and four novice evaluators measured 35 scoliotic curves with the software on three separate occasions, one month apart. The observers re-measured the same radiographic studies on three separate occasions three months later but on conventional X-ray films. The differences between the mean bias errors (MBE) within the experience groups were statistically significant between the experts (software) and novices (manual) (p < 0.001) and between the novices (software) and novices (manual) (p = 0.005). When measured with the software, the intra-group error in the expert group was MBE = 1.71 ± 0.61° and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC (2,1)) = 0.986, and in the novice group, MBE = 1.9 ± 0.67° and ICC (2,1) = 0.97. There was almost a perfect concordance among the two measurement methods, ICC (2,1) = 0.998 and minimum detectable change (MCD95) < 0.4°. Control of the intrinsic error sources enabled obtaining inter- and intra-observer MDC95 < 0.5° in the two experience groups and with the two measurement methods. The computer-aided software TraumaMeter increases the validity and reliability of Cobb angle measurements concerning manual measurement.
Cobb 角值是评估青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者的关键参数。本研究旨在评估一种软件的有效性和绝对可靠性,以确定 AIS 数字 X 射线中的 Cobb 角,该软件由具有不同经验水平的两位观察者使用。四位专家和四位新手评估员在三个不同的场合,间隔一个月,使用该软件测量了 35 个脊柱侧凸曲线。三个月后,观察者在三个不同的场合使用传统 X 射线胶片对同一批放射学研究重新进行了测量。经验组内观察者之间的平均偏差误差(MBE)差异在专家(软件)和新手(手动)之间具有统计学意义(p < 0.001),在新手(软件)和新手(手动)之间也具有统计学意义(p = 0.005)。当使用软件进行测量时,专家组内的组内误差为 MBE = 1.71 ± 0.61°,组内相关系数(ICC(2,1))为 0.986,而新手组内的 MBE = 1.9 ± 0.67°,ICC(2,1)为 0.97。两种测量方法之间几乎具有完美的一致性,ICC(2,1)= 0.998,最小可检测变化(MCD95)<0.4°。控制内在误差源使两组观察者在两种测量方法中都能获得 0.5°的 MDC95 < 0.5°。计算机辅助软件 TraumaMeter 提高了 Cobb 角度测量的有效性和可靠性,与手动测量相比。