Department of Cardiology and Interventional Angiology, Kashubian Center for Heart and Vascular Diseases, Pomeranian Hospitals, 84-200 Wejherowo, Poland.
First Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Upper Silesia Medical Centre, 40-635 Katowice, Poland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 17;19(8):4880. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084880.
Pharmacological cardioversion (PCV) is commonly a primary option for termination of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in emergency departments (ED). This is a subanalysis of the CANT II study, evaluating the effectiveness and safety of antazoline in patients (n = 777) at three stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD): Group I > 60 mL/min (n = 531), Group II 45−59 mL/min (n = 149), and Group III < 45 mL/min (n = 97). Patients in Group III were older and with a higher prevalence of co-morbidities; however, we did not find statistically significant differences in the overall effectiveness of PCV in comparison with the other groups. In patients receiving amiodarone, the PCV success rate was similar in all the studied groups, but along with a renal function decline, it decreased in patients receiving antazoline (79.1 vs. 35%; p < 0.001), and it increased almost significantly in patients receiving propafenone (69.9 vs. 100%; p = 0.067). In patients in Group I, antazoline restored a sinus rhythm as effectively as propafenone and amiodarone; however, in patients in Group III, both antazoline and amiodarone became less effective in restoring a sinus rhythm than propafenone (p = 0.002 and p = 0.034, respectively). The rate of safety endpoint was the highest in patients in Group III (eGFR < 45 mL/min), and it was significantly higher than in patients in Groups I and II (p = 0.008 and p = 0.036, respectively). We did not observe antazoline-related adverse events in any of the studied groups of patients. This real-world registry analysis revealed a different influence of CKD on the effectiveness of individual drugs, and while propafenone and amiodarone maintained their AF termination efficacy, antazoline became significantly less effective in restoring sinus rhythm.
药物复律(PCV)通常是急诊科终止近期发作心房颤动(AF)的主要选择。这是 CANT II 研究的一个亚分析,评估了安他唑啉在慢性肾脏病(CKD)三个阶段的患者(n = 777)中的有效性和安全性:I 组 > 60 mL/min(n = 531),II 组 45-59 mL/min(n = 149)和 III 组 < 45 mL/min(n = 97)。III 组患者年龄较大,合并症患病率较高;然而,我们没有发现与其他组相比,PCV 的总体有效性存在统计学显著差异。在接受胺碘酮的患者中,所有研究组的 PCV 成功率相似,但随着肾功能下降,接受安他唑啉的患者成功率降低(79.1%比 35%;p < 0.001),而接受普罗帕酮的患者成功率增加(69.9%比 100%;p = 0.067)。在 I 组患者中,安他唑啉恢复窦性心律的效果与普罗帕酮和胺碘酮一样有效;然而,在 III 组患者中,安他唑啉和胺碘酮恢复窦性心律的效果均不如普罗帕酮(p = 0.002 和 p = 0.034)。在 eGFR < 45 mL/min 的 III 组患者中,安全性终点的发生率最高,明显高于 I 组和 II 组(p = 0.008 和 p = 0.036)。在任何研究组患者中,我们都没有观察到与安他唑啉相关的不良事件。这项真实世界的注册分析揭示了 CKD 对个别药物有效性的不同影响,虽然普罗帕酮和胺碘酮保持了其终止 AF 的疗效,但安他唑啉恢复窦性心律的效果明显降低。