Department for Materials and Production, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
Department for Electronic Systems, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 11;22(8):2927. doi: 10.3390/s22082927.
Evaluations of different technologies and solutions for indoor localization exist but only a few are aimed at the industrial context. In this paper, we compare and analyze two prominent solutions based on Ultra Wide Band Radio (Pozyx) and Ultrasound (GoT), both installed in an industrial manufacturing laboratory. The comparison comprises a static and a dynamic case. The static case evaluates average localization errors over 90 s intervals for 100 ground-truth points at three different heights, corresponding to different relevant objects in an industrial environment: mobile robots, pallets, forklifts and worker helmets. The average error obtained across the laboratory is similar for both systems and is between 0.3 m and 0.6 m, with higher errors for low altitudes. The dynamic case is performed with a mobile robot travelling with an average speed of 0.5 m/s at a height of 0.3 m. In this case, low frequency error components are filtered out to focus the comparison on dynamic errors. Average dynamic errors are within 0.3-0.4 m for Pozyx and within 0.1-0.2 m for GoT. Results show an acceptable accuracy required for tracking people or objects and could serve as a guideline for the least achievable accuracy when applied for mobile robotics in conjunction with other elements of a robotic navigation stack.
现有的室内定位技术和解决方案评估很多,但针对工业环境的却很少。在本文中,我们比较和分析了两种基于超宽带无线电(Pozyx)和超声波(GoT)的突出解决方案,这两种方案都安装在一个工业制造实验室中。比较包括静态和动态两种情况。静态情况评估了在三个不同高度(对应工业环境中的不同相关物体:移动机器人、托盘、叉车和工人头盔)的 100 个真实位置点上 90 秒间隔的平均定位误差。整个实验室的平均误差在两种系统之间相似,在 0.3 米到 0.6 米之间,低高度的误差更高。动态情况是在高度为 0.3 米、平均速度为 0.5 米/秒的移动机器人上进行的。在这种情况下,过滤掉低频误差分量,以集中比较动态误差。Pozyx 的平均动态误差在 0.3-0.4 米之间,GoT 的平均动态误差在 0.1-0.2 米之间。结果表明,对于跟踪人员或物体来说,这是可以接受的精度要求,并且可以作为在与机器人导航堆栈的其他元素结合使用时应用于移动机器人的最低可实现精度的指南。