Suppr超能文献

基于腕部加速度计的机器学习模型是否能抵御老年人身体性能差异的影响?

Are Machine Learning Models on Wrist Accelerometry Robust against Differences in Physical Performance among Older Adults?

机构信息

Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 15;22(8):3061. doi: 10.3390/s22083061.

Abstract

Sufficient physical activity (PA) reduces the risk of a myriad of diseases and preserves physical capabilities in later life. While there have been significant achievements in mapping accelerations to real-life movements using machine learning (ML), errors continue to be common, particularly for wrist-worn devices. It remains unknown whether ML models are robust for estimating age-related loss of physical function. In this study, we evaluated the performance of ML models (XGBoost and LASSO) to estimate the hallmark measures of PA in low physical performance (LPP) and high physical performance (HPP) groups. Our models were built to recognize PA types and intensities, identify each individual activity, and estimate energy expenditure (EE) using wrist-worn accelerometer data (33 activities per participant) from a large sample of participants (n = 247, 57% females, aged 60+ years). Results indicated that the ML models were accurate in recognizing PA by type and intensity while also estimating EE accurately. However, the models built to recognize individual activities were less robust. Across all tasks, XGBoost outperformed LASSO. XGBoost obtained F1-Scores for sedentary (0.932 ± 0.005), locomotion (0.946 ± 0.003), lifestyle (0.927 ± 0.006), and strength flexibility exercise (0.915 ± 0.017) activity type recognition tasks. The F1-Scores for recognizing low, light, and moderate activity intensity were (0.932 ± 0.005), (0.840 ± 0.004), and (0.869 ± 0.005), respectively. The root mean square error for EE estimation was 0.836 ± 0.059 METs. There was no evidence showing that splitting the participants into the LPP and HPP groups improved the models’ performance on estimating the hallmark measures of physical activities. In conclusion, using features derived from wrist-worn accelerometer data, machine learning models can accurately recognize PA types and intensities and estimate EE for older adults with high and low physical function.

摘要

足够的身体活动(PA)可降低多种疾病的风险,并保持晚年的身体机能。虽然使用机器学习(ML)将加速度映射到现实生活中的运动已经取得了重大成就,但错误仍然很常见,尤其是对于腕戴设备。尚不清楚 ML 模型是否能够稳健地估计与年龄相关的身体功能丧失。在这项研究中,我们评估了机器学习模型(XGBoost 和 LASSO)的性能,以估计低身体表现(LPP)和高身体表现(HPP)组中身体活动的标志性测量值。我们的模型旨在识别 PA 类型和强度,识别每个单独的活动,并使用来自大量参与者(n=247,女性占 57%,年龄在 60 岁以上)的腕戴加速度计数据(每个参与者 33 种活动)估计能量消耗(EE)。结果表明,ML 模型在识别 PA 的类型和强度方面非常准确,同时也能准确估计 EE。然而,用于识别单个活动的模型则不太稳健。在所有任务中,XGBoost 的表现均优于 LASSO。XGBoost 获得了用于识别久坐(0.932±0.005)、运动(0.946±0.003)、生活方式(0.927±0.006)和力量柔韧性运动(0.915±0.017)活动类型的 F1 分数。识别低、轻和中强度活动的 F1 分数分别为(0.932±0.005)、(0.840±0.004)和(0.869±0.005)。EE 估计的均方根误差为 0.836±0.059 METs。没有证据表明将参与者分为 LPP 和 HPP 两组可以提高模型在估计身体活动标志性测量值方面的性能。总之,使用腕戴加速度计数据得出的特征,机器学习模型可以准确识别老年人的 PA 类型和强度,并估计他们的 EE。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d4/9032589/f734831f8d6d/sensors-22-03061-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验