Suppr超能文献

国家糖尿病预防计划中二人组的优缺点:生活方式教练的观点。

Promises and Pitfalls of Dyads in the National Diabetes Prevention Program: Lifestyle Coach Perspectives.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, 14434University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Department of Nutritional Sciences, 51329University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2022 Sep;36(7):1204-1207. doi: 10.1177/08901171221088580. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe Lifestyle Coach perceptions of dyads (i.e., family members and/or friends) in the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP).

DESIGN

Qualitative evaluation of cross-sectional survey responses.

SETTING

Online.

PARTICIPANTS

Lifestyle Coaches (n=253) with experience teaching at least one in-person year-long NDPP cohort at a CDC-recognized organization.

MEASURES

Survey included items on background and experience with dyadic approach, as well as open-ended items on the benefits and challenges observed when working with dyads in the NDPP.

ANALYSIS

Lifestyle Coach background and experience were analyzed descriptively in SPSS. Open-ended responses were content coded in ATLAS.ti using qualitative description, and then grouped into categories.

RESULTS

Most Lifestyle Coaches (n=210; 83.0%) reported experience delivering the NDPP to dyads. Benefits of a dyadic approach included having a partner in lifestyle change, superior outcomes and increased engagement, and positive "ripple effects." Challenges included difficult relationship dynamics, differences between dyad members, negative "ripple effects," and logistics.

CONCLUSION

Lifestyle Coaches described a number of benefits, as well as some challenges, with a dyadic approach to the NDPP. Given the concordance between close others in lifestyle and other risk factors for type 2 diabetes, utilizing a dyadic approach in the NDPP has the potential to increase engagement, improve outcomes, and extend the reach of the program.

摘要

目的

描述生活方式教练对国家糖尿病预防计划(NDPP)中二人组(即家庭成员和/或朋友)的看法。

设计

对横断面调查回复的定性评估。

地点

在线。

参与者

具有在 CDC 认可的组织中教授至少一个为期一年的现场 NDPP 课程经验的生活方式教练(n=253)。

措施

调查包括关于双体方法背景和经验的项目,以及在 NDPP 中与双体合作时观察到的益处和挑战的开放性项目。

分析

SPSS 对生活方式教练的背景和经验进行了描述性分析。ATLAS.ti 中的开放性回复使用定性描述进行内容编码,然后分为类别。

结果

大多数生活方式教练(n=210;83.0%)报告了向二人组提供 NDPP 的经验。双体方法的好处包括在生活方式改变方面有一个伙伴、更好的结果和更高的参与度,以及积极的“连锁反应”。挑战包括困难的关系动态、二人组成员之间的差异、负面的“连锁反应”和后勤问题。

结论

生活方式教练描述了 NDPP 双体方法的一些益处和一些挑战。鉴于密切相关的人在生活方式和其他 2 型糖尿病风险因素方面的一致性,在 NDPP 中采用双体方法有可能提高参与度、改善结果并扩大该计划的覆盖范围。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

8
Whatever happened to qualitative description?定性描述怎么了?
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40. doi: 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验