Department of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 22;12(4):e054677. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054677.
Recent international and national strategies to reduce suicide mortality have suggested that social protection programmes may be an effective multisectoral response given the link between material deprivation and suicides in observational studies. However, there is a lack of evidence on the causal relationship between social protection programmes and suicide, which may hinder substantial national budget reallocations necessary to implement these policies. Social protection programmes are government interventions that ensure adequate income now and in the future, through changes to earned income (eg, minimum wage increase) or social security (via cash transfers or cash equivalents). Our review aims to evaluate the existing evidence on a causal relationship between social protection programmes and suicide mortality by examining all relevant experimental and quasi-experimental studies between January 1980 and November 2021.
The review will be conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. We will search references published between 1 January 1980 and 30 November 2021 in 10 electronic databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), PsycINFO, EMBASE and Applied Social Sciences Index Abstracts. Seven reviewers will independently participate in screening studies from titles, abstracts and full texts across all the stages. Experimental (ie, randomised controlled trials) and quasi-experimental studies (ie, non-randomised interventional studies) written in English, French, Spanish, German, Chinese, Korean and Japanese examining the impact of income security programmes on suicide mortality were included. Meta-analyses will be conducted if there are at least three studies with similar income security programmes.
Our proposed review does not require ethical approval. In collaboration with our community partners, we will develop a policy brief for stakeholders to support efforts to implement social protection programmes to help prevent suicides. Our findings will be presented at conferences, published in a peer-reviewer journal and promoted on social media platforms.
CRD42021252235.
最近的国际和国家减少自杀死亡率的策略表明,鉴于物质匮乏与观察性研究中自杀之间的关联,社会保护计划可能是一种有效的多部门应对措施。然而,由于缺乏社会保护计划与自杀之间因果关系的证据,可能会阻碍为实施这些政策进行必要的大量国家预算重新分配。社会保护计划是政府干预措施,通过改变工资收入(例如提高最低工资)或社会保障(通过现金转移或现金等价物),确保现在和未来有足够的收入。我们的综述旨在通过检查 1980 年 1 月至 2021 年 11 月期间所有相关的实验和准实验研究,评估社会保护计划与自杀死亡率之间因果关系的现有证据。
综述将按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行。我们将在 10 个电子数据库中搜索 1980 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 11 月 30 日期间发表的参考文献,包括 MEDLINE(PubMed)、PsycINFO、EMBASE 和应用社会科学索引摘要。7 名审查员将独立参与筛选所有阶段的标题、摘要和全文中的研究。纳入了以英语、法语、西班牙语、德语、中文、韩语和日语撰写的实验(即随机对照试验)和准实验研究(即非随机干预研究),这些研究调查了收入保障计划对自杀死亡率的影响。如果有至少三项具有相似收入保障计划的研究,将进行荟萃分析。
我们提出的综述不需要伦理批准。我们将与社区合作伙伴合作,为利益相关者制定一份政策简报,以支持实施社会保护计划的工作,以帮助预防自杀。我们的研究结果将在会议上发表,在同行评议期刊上发表,并在社交媒体平台上宣传。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021252235。