Suppr超能文献

FAEV 和 EMA/CO 方案作为妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤初始治疗的疗效。

Efficacies of FAEV and EMA/CO regimens as primary treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2022 Aug;127(3):524-530. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01809-3. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D (EMA)/cyclophosphamide, vincristine (CO) as first-line treatment for high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). However, the floxuridine, actinomycin D, etoposide and vincristine (FAEV) regimen is commonly used to treat these patients in China. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacies and toxicities of FAEV and EMA/CO.

METHODS

Ninety-four patients with GTN were enrolled between May 2015 and April 2019 and randomly assigned to the FAEV or EMA/CO regimen. The rates of complete remission and relapse and the toxicities were compared in August 2021.

RESULTS

Five patients were excluded from the analysis. There were 46 patients in the FAEV group and 43 patients in the EMA/CO group. The complete remission rates following primary treatment were 89.1% and 79.1% (P = 0.193), respectively. The relapse rates were 8.7% and 9.3% (P = 0.604). The apparent incidences of grade 4 myelosuppression were 60.9% and 32.6% (P = 0.008), respectively; however, they became both 32.6% (P = 0.996) after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Other adverse reactions were similar in the two groups. No patient died of disease.

CONCLUSION

FAEV has comparable efficacy and toxicity to EMA/CO as the primary treatment for high-risk GTN, and may thus be another first-line choice of chemotherapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

chictr.org.cn: ChiCTR1800017423.

摘要

背景

指南推荐依托泊苷、甲氨蝶呤、放线菌素 D(EMA)/环磷酰胺、长春新碱(CO)作为高危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN)的一线治疗药物。然而,在中国,氟尿嘧啶、放线菌素 D、依托泊苷和长春新碱(FAEV)方案常用于治疗这些患者。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,比较 FAEV 和 EMA/CO 的疗效和毒性。

方法

2015 年 5 月至 2019 年 4 月期间,共纳入 94 例 GTN 患者,并随机分为 FAEV 或 EMA/CO 组。2021 年 8 月比较两组完全缓解率和复发率及毒性。

结果

5 例患者被排除在分析之外。FAEV 组有 46 例患者,EMA/CO 组有 43 例患者。初次治疗后的完全缓解率分别为 89.1%和 79.1%(P=0.193)。复发率分别为 8.7%和 9.3%(P=0.604)。4 级骨髓抑制的明显发生率分别为 60.9%和 32.6%(P=0.008),但粒细胞集落刺激因子支持后均为 32.6%(P=0.996)。两组其他不良反应相似。无患者死于疾病。

结论

FAEV 作为高危 GTN 的一线治疗方案,与 EMA/CO 疗效相当,毒性相当,可能是化疗的另一种一线选择。

临床试验注册

chictr.org.cn:ChiCTR1800017423。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验