• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌患者的护理交接策略的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of care transition strategies for colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Regional University of the Northwest of the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Ijuí, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Federal University of Santa Catarina, R. Delfino Conti, 279 - Trindade, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, 88040-535, Brazil.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jul;30(7):6251-6261. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07033-2. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-022-07033-2
PMID:35459953
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Implementing effective strategies to transition care for individuals with colorectal cancer is an important tool to qualify care for affected individuals, as well as contribute to the dispensation of continuous and quality care to patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of strategies to transition from hospital care to the community compared to usual care for colorectal cancer patients to reduce hospital stay, readmissions at 30 days, and visit to the emergency department up to 30 days.

METHOD

Systematic review and meta-analysis followed the recommendations of PRISMA statement, with protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD 42,020,162,249). Searches were carried out in May 2020 in the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. The measure of effect used for dichotomous outcomes was relative risk, and for continuous outcomes, the difference of means was used, with their confidence intervals of 95%. Heterogeneity was evaluated using inconsistency statistics.

RESULTS

Of 631 identified studies, seven studies were included. The meta-analysis of the studies showed a reduction in readmissions at 30 days of 32% and a significant reduction in hospital stay time of approximately one and a half days, both of which were analyzed in favor of the group of care transition interventions.

CONCLUSION

The findings showed effective care transition strategies for the transition of colorectal cancer patients, such as post-discharge active surveillance program, standardized protocol of improved recovery, and telephone follow-up.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42020162249.

摘要

介绍

实施有效的策略来过渡护理结直肠癌患者是保证患者护理质量的重要手段,也有助于为患者提供持续和高质量的护理。

目的

评估与常规护理相比,将结直肠癌患者从医院护理过渡到社区护理的策略的有效性,以减少住院时间、30 天内再入院率和 30 天内急诊就诊次数。

方法

系统评价和荟萃分析遵循 PRISMA 声明的建议,方案在 PROSPERO(CRD42020162249)中注册。2020 年 5 月在以下数据库中进行了检索:PubMed/MEDLINE、LILACS、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Central。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。对于二分类结局,使用相对风险作为效应量;对于连续结局,使用均数差值及其 95%置信区间作为效应量。使用不一致性统计来评估异质性。

结果

在 631 项已识别的研究中,有 7 项研究被纳入。对这些研究的荟萃分析表明,30 天内再入院率降低了 32%,住院时间显著缩短了大约一天半,这两个结果均有利于护理过渡干预组。

结论

研究结果表明,针对结直肠癌患者的护理过渡策略是有效的,例如出院后主动监测计划、改进恢复标准化协议和电话随访。

试验注册

CRD42020162249。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of care transition strategies for colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.结直肠癌患者的护理交接策略的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jul;30(7):6251-6261. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07033-2. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
2
Effectiveness of discharge interventions from hospital to home on hospital readmissions: a systematic review.从医院到家庭的出院干预对再入院的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):106-73. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2381.
3
Effect of Educational Interventions to Reduce Readmissions due to Heart Failure Decompensation in Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.教育干预对减少成人心力衰竭失代偿再入院效果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Invest Educ Enferm. 2021 Jun;39(2). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v39n2e05.
4
Community-based care for the specialized management of heart failure: an evidence-based analysis.基于社区的心力衰竭专科管理:一项循证分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(17):1-42. Epub 2009 Nov 1.
5
Comparison of Mortality and Hospital Readmissions Among Patients Receiving Virtual Ward Transitional Care vs Usual Postdischarge Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.虚拟病房过渡护理与常规出院后护理的患者死亡率和再入院率比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2219113. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.19113.
6
Supported self-management for patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): an evidence synthesis and economic analysis.中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的支持性自我管理:证据综合与经济分析
Health Technol Assess. 2015 May;19(36):1-516. doi: 10.3310/hta19360.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Effectiveness of person- and family-centered care transition interventions: a systematic review protocol.以患者和家庭为中心的护理过渡期干预措施的效果:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 8;6(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0554-z.
9
10
Successful care transitions for older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of interventions that support medication continuity.老年人成功的护理过渡:对支持药物连续性干预措施效果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2020 Jul 1;49(4):558-569. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa002.

引用本文的文献

1
Research progress and trends in colorectal cancer self-management: a bibliometric analysis from 2004 to 2024.结直肠癌自我管理的研究进展与趋势:2004年至2024年的文献计量分析
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 24;33(7):620. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09678-1.
2
Are there opportunities to improve care as patients transition through the cancer care continuum? A scoping review.在患者贯穿癌症护理连续过程中,是否存在改善护理的机会?一项范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 12;14(12):e078210. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078210.
3
Transition of care of patients with chronic diseases and its relation with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 29;18(3):e1003583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Moving forward after cancer: successful implementation of a colorectal cancer patient-centered transitions program.
慢性病患者的转归及其与临床和社会人口学特征的关系。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2023 Oct 9;31:e4013. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.6594.4013. eCollection 2023.
4
Weaknesses in the Continuity of Care of Puerperal Women: An Integrative Literature Review.产后妇女护理连续性的薄弱环节:综合文献回顾。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023 Jul;45(7):e415-e421. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772185. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
5
Care transitions among oncological patients: from hospital to community.肿瘤患者的治疗过渡期:从医院到社区。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2023 Jan 23;56:e20220308. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0308en. eCollection 2023.
癌症后继续前行:成功实施以结直肠癌患者为中心的过渡期计划。
J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Feb;14(1):4-8. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00819-0. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
4
Hospital characteristics, rather than surgical volume, predict length of stay following colorectal cancer surgery.医院特征而非手术量可预测结直肠癌手术后的住院时间。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2020 Feb;44(1):73-82. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12932. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
5
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
6
Randomized clinical trial of accelerated enhanced recovery after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery (RecoverMI trial).加速微创结直肠癌手术后加速康复(RecoverMI 试验)的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2019 Sep;106(10):1311-1318. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11223. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
7
S128: Active post discharge surveillance program as a part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol decreases emergency department visits and readmissions in colorectal patients.S128:作为强化术后康复方案的一部分,主动出院后监测计划可降低结直肠患者的急诊就诊次数和再入院率。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3816-3827. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06725-x. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
8
Components of Comprehensive and Effective Transitional Care.全面且有效的过渡性护理的组成部分。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jun;65(6):1119-1125. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14782. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
9
Reducing Readmissions While Shortening Length of Stay: The Positive Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Colorectal Surgery.在缩短住院时间的同时减少再入院率:强化康复方案在结直肠癌手术中的积极影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Feb;60(2):219-227. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000748.
10
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.