Department of Cardiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2022 Jul;27(4):e12949. doi: 10.1111/anec.12949. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
A 54-year-old man had a dual-chamber pacemaker implantation 9 years ago because of sick sinus syndrome at a different facility. The patient did not undergo any evaluation of his pacemaker for a long time with cardiologist. The patient was admitted to another hospital manifesting dyspnea and palpitation with atrial fibrillation for 1 month, and he was diagnosed with ventricular lead perforation. For further treatment, he was referred to our hospital, and an elective replacement indicator (ERI) of the battery state and a malpositioned ventricular lead into the middle cardiac vein were found. Finally, the pacing lead was left in the primary place and the pacemaker was replaced.
一位 54 岁男性 9 年前因病态窦房结综合征在另一家医院植入了双腔起搏器。此后很长一段时间,患者都没有与心脏病专家一起对其起搏器进行任何评估。患者因 1 个月来出现呼吸困难和心悸伴心房颤动而被收入另一家医院,被诊断为心室导联穿孔。为了进一步治疗,他被转至我院,发现电池状态的选择性更换指标(ERI)和心室导联错位到心静脉中部。最终,起搏导联被留在原处,更换了起搏器。