Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, MA, USA.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, MA, USA; Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.
Cortex. 2022 Jun;151:240-258. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.02.014. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
Few studies have examined how multisensory emotional experiences are processed and encoded into memory. Here, we aimed to determine whether, at encoding, activity within functionally-defined visual- and auditory-processing brain regions discriminated the emotional category (i.e., positive, negative, or neutral) of the multisensory (audio-visual) events. Participants incidentally encoded positive, negative, and neutral multisensory stimuli during event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Following a 3-h post-encoding delay, their memory for studied stimuli was tested, allowing us to identify emotion-category-specific subsequent-memory effects focusing on medial temporal lobe regions (i.e., amygdala, hippocampus) and visual- and auditory-processing regions. We used a combination of univariate and multivoxel pattern fMRI analyses (MVPA) to examine emotion-category-specificity in mean activity levels and neural patterning, respectively. Univariate analyses revealed many more visual regions that showed negative-category-specificity relative to positive-category-specificity, and auditory regions only showed negative-category-specificity. These results suggest that negative emotion is more closely tied to information contained within sensory regions, a conclusion that was supported by the MVPA analyses. Functional connectivity analyses further revealed that the visual amplification of category-selective processing is driven, in part, by mean signal from the amygdala. Interestingly, while stronger representations in visuo-auditory regions were related to subsequent-memory for neutral multisensory stimuli, they were related to subsequent-forgetting of positive and negative stimuli. Neural patterning in the hippocampus and amygdala were related to memory for negative multisensory stimuli. These results provide new evidence that negative emotional stimuli are processed with increased engagement of visuosensory regions, but that this sensory engagement-that generalizes across the entire emotion category-is not the type of sensory encoding that is most beneficial for later retrieval.
很少有研究探讨多感官情感体验是如何被处理和编码为记忆的。在这里,我们旨在确定在编码时,功能定义的视觉和听觉处理脑区的活动是否可以区分多感官(视听)事件的情感类别(即积极、消极或中性)。参与者在事件相关功能磁共振成像(fMRI)期间偶然地编码了积极、消极和中性的多感官刺激。在 3 小时的编码后延迟后,测试了他们对学习刺激的记忆,使我们能够识别专注于内侧颞叶区域(即杏仁核、海马体)和视觉及听觉处理区域的情绪类别特定的后续记忆效应。我们使用单变量和多体素模式 fMRI 分析(MVPA)分别检查平均活动水平和神经模式的情绪类别特异性。单变量分析显示,与积极类别特异性相比,有更多的视觉区域显示出负性类别特异性,而听觉区域仅显示出负性类别特异性。这些结果表明,负性情绪与感官区域内包含的信息更为紧密相关,这一结论得到了 MVPA 分析的支持。功能连接分析进一步表明,类别选择性加工的视觉放大部分是由杏仁核的平均信号驱动的。有趣的是,虽然在视听觉区域中更强的表示与中性多感官刺激的后续记忆有关,但它们与积极和消极刺激的后续遗忘有关。海马体和杏仁核中的神经模式与负性多感官刺激的记忆有关。这些结果提供了新的证据,表明负性情绪刺激的处理需要增加视觉感官区域的参与,但这种感官参与——跨整个情绪类别普遍存在——不是对后续检索最有利的那种感官编码。