Bergman R N, Prager R, Volund A, Olefsky J M
J Clin Invest. 1987 Mar;79(3):790-800. doi: 10.1172/JCI112886.
Studies were done to determine whether the minimal model approach and the glucose clamp measure equivalent indices of insulin action. Euglycemic glucose clamps (glucose, G: 85 mg/dl) were performed at two rates of insulin (I) infusion (15 and 40 mU/min per m2) in 10 subjects (body mass index, BMI, from 21 to 41 kg/m2). Insulin sensitivity index (SI) from clamps varied from 0.15 to 3.15 (mean: 1.87 +/- 0.36 X 10(-2) dl/[min per m2] per microU/ml), and declined linearly with increasing adiposity (versus BMI: r = -0.97; P less than 0.001). SI from modeling the modified frequently sampled intravenous tolerance test varied from 0.66 to 7.34 X 10(-4) min-1 per microU/ml, and was strongly correlated with SIP(clamp) (r = 0.89; P less than 0.001). SI and SIP(clamp) were similar (0.046 +/- 0.008 vs. 0.037 +/- 0.007 dl/min per microU/ml, P greater than 0.35); the relation had a slope not different from unity (1.05 P greater than 0.70) and passed through the origin (P greater than 0.40). However, on a period basis, SI exceeded SIP(clamp) slightly, due to inhibition of hepatic glucose output during the FSIGT, not included in SIP(clamp). These methods are equivalent for assessment of overall insulin sensitivity in normal and insulin-resistant nondiabetic subjects.
开展了多项研究以确定最小模型法和葡萄糖钳夹法是否能测量等效的胰岛素作用指标。对10名受试者(体重指数,BMI,范围为21至41kg/m²)以两种胰岛素(I)输注速率(每平方米15和40mU/分钟)进行了正常血糖葡萄糖钳夹试验(葡萄糖,G:85mg/dl)。钳夹试验得出的胰岛素敏感性指数(SI)在0.15至3.15之间(平均值:1.87±0.36×10⁻²dl/[每分钟每平方米]每微单位/毫升),并随肥胖程度增加呈线性下降(与BMI的相关性:r = -0.97;P<0.001)。通过对改良的频繁采样静脉葡萄糖耐量试验进行建模得出的SI在0.66至7.34×10⁻⁴分钟⁻¹每微单位/毫升之间,并且与钳夹试验得出的SIP密切相关(r = 0.89;P<0.001)。SI和钳夹试验得出的SIP相似(0.046±0.008对0.037±0.007dl/分钟每微单位/毫升,P>0.35);两者关系的斜率与1无差异(1.05,P>0.70)且通过原点(P>0.40)。然而,在某一时间段内,由于在FSIGT期间肝葡萄糖输出受到抑制(未包含在钳夹试验得出的SIP中),SI略高于钳夹试验得出的SIP。这些方法在评估正常和胰岛素抵抗的非糖尿病受试者的整体胰岛素敏感性方面是等效的。