Lennon Sarah Jane, Mannion James, Keelan Edward, O'Brien Jim, Jauvert Gael, Gul Enes Elvin, Boles Usama
Heart and Vascular Centre, Cardiology Department, Atrial Fibrillation Institute, Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Cardiol Res. 2022 Apr;13(2):97-103. doi: 10.14740/cr1337. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
Ablation index (AI) is a novel catheter-based parameter that has improved the outcome and safety of radiofrequency (RF) ablation of pulmonary vein isolations (PVIs). This index incorporates contact force (CF) (g), time (s), and power (W) parameters. The role of AI in redo ablations for persistent atrial fibrillation (peAF) has not been fully investigated. Hence, the impact of AI on the success of the redo PVI during the short-term follow-up period is the aim of this study.
A retrospective analysis of 39 consecutive patients who underwent redo PVI ablations for peAF was carried out between January 2016 and December 2018. Target values for AI were 500 - 550 for anterior and roof and 400 - 380 for posterior and inferior regions. We compared outcomes between AI-guided and catheter CF ablations (i.e., forced time integral (FTI) of more than 400 g/s) during a follow-up of 24 months.
Pulmonary vein reconnections at redo procedure were similar in both groups (P = 0.1). AF free burden period was non-significant (mean 15.53 ± 2.4 months in AI group vs. 15.22 ± 1.9 months in CF group, P = 0.79) at 24 months. The AI group demonstrated greater numbers of patients for whom anti-arrhythmic therapy could be de-escalated over 1 year (n = 11 (65%) in AI vs. n = 6 (27%) in CF, P = 0.02). Fewer patients underwent escalation of their anti-arrhythmic therapy (n = 2 (12%) in AI vs. n = 7 (32%) in CF, P = 0.15). The AI group trended towards a shorter procedure time (111.6 ± 27 min) compared to the CF group (133 ± 40 min) (P = 0.06). Other procedural details were comparable.
Redo PVI interventions using AI lead to a significant de-escalation in medication during follow-up. Procedure time and radiation dose using AI tends to be shorter. Both techniques are safe with minimal complications.
消融指数(AI)是一种基于导管的新参数,它改善了肺静脉隔离(PVI)射频消融的效果和安全性。该指数纳入了接触力(CF)(克)、时间(秒)和功率(瓦)参数。AI在持续性心房颤动(peAF)再次消融中的作用尚未得到充分研究。因此,本研究的目的是探讨AI在短期随访期间对再次PVI成功的影响。
对2016年1月至2018年12月期间连续39例行peAF再次PVI消融的患者进行回顾性分析。AI的目标值为前壁和顶部500 - 550,后壁和下部区域400 - 380。我们比较了AI引导消融和导管CF消融(即强制时间积分(FTI)超过400克/秒)在24个月随访期间的结果。
两组再次手术时肺静脉再连接情况相似(P = 0.1)。24个月时,无房颤负荷期无显著差异(AI组平均15.53±2.4个月,CF组平均15.22±1.9个月,P = 0.79)。AI组在1年以上可减少抗心律失常治疗的患者数量更多(AI组n = 11(65%),CF组n = 6(27%),P = 0.02)。接受抗心律失常治疗升级的患者较少(AI组n = 2(12%),CF组n = 7(32%),P = 0.15)。与CF组(133±40分钟)相比,AI组手术时间有缩短趋势(111.6±27分钟)(P = 0.06)。其他手术细节相当。
使用AI进行再次PVI干预可使随访期间药物治疗显著减少。使用AI的手术时间和辐射剂量往往更短。两种技术都很安全,并发症最少。