Personality and Psychopathology research group (PEPS), Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences (PE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Clinical Centre of Excellence for Personality Disorders and Autism Spectrum Disorders in Older Adults, PersonaCura, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Aging Ment Health. 2023 Jun;27(6):1173-1180. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2068134. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
Categorical criteria are not well suited to inform personality disorder (PD) diagnoses in older adults. More promising are the ICD-11 and DSM-5 alternative models. Both conceptualize PD by level of severity and maladaptive traits. Severity is conditional for making a PD diagnosis. Trait levels portray stylistic differences in PD expression. Yet, in older adults the hierarchical trait structure is unknown. Neither is the differentiation of the severity criterion from maladaptive traits confirmed.
A series of exploratory factor analyses with progressively greater numbers of factors were conducted to examine the hierarchical trait structure in 293 community dwelling older adults. The on average differentiation of a single higher order personality functioning factor from trait factors at succeeding levels of the hierarchy was estimated with Cohen effect size.
Six meaningful trait levels were identified. From the fourth trait level on the general personality functioning factor shared less than 15% variance on average with the trait factors. Trait factors at the sixth level corresponded to both DSM-5 and ICD-11 pathological traits.
A future nosology integrating DSM-5 and ICD-11 trait proposals would be applicable in older adults. Personality functioning can be differentiated from traits, so separate assessment of traits and severity is worthwhile.
分类标准不太适合为老年人提供人格障碍 (PD) 诊断。更有前途的是 ICD-11 和 DSM-5 替代模型。两者都通过严重程度和适应不良特征来概念化 PD。严重程度是 PD 诊断的条件。特质水平描绘了 PD 表达的风格差异。然而,在老年人中,层次特质结构是未知的。严重程度标准与适应不良特征的区别也没有得到证实。
进行了一系列探索性因素分析,随着因素数量的增加,以检查 293 名居住在社区的老年人的层次特质结构。使用 Cohen 效应大小估计了从单一高阶人格功能因素到层次结构中后续层次特质因素的平均差异。
确定了六个有意义的特质水平。从第四个特质水平开始,一般人格功能因素与特质因素的共同方差平均不到 15%。第六个特质水平的特质因素对应 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 的病理性特质。
未来将 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 特质建议整合在一起的分类学将适用于老年人。人格功能可以与特质区分开来,因此特质和严重程度的单独评估是值得的。