Community Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Cantonal Medical Office, Health of Canton of Vaud, Department of Health and Social Action (DSAS), Avenue des Casernes 2, 1014 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Community Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2022 May-Jun;82:101793. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2022.101793. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
Patient satisfaction with care is widely recognized as one of the most important indicator of quality in mental health care. It can impact several treatment outcomes, such as treatment adherence and engagement with services. At the same time, as an outcome in itself, satisfaction with care is also affected by several factors, first and foremost by being coerced. The main aim of this study was to test if perceiving treatment pressures as fair and effective could positively impact patient satisfaction, even more than formal coercive measures.
Globally, 133 voluntary and involuntary inpatients were interviewed. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, including history of previous experiences of formal coercion and legal status of the hospitalisation, were collected through a structured questionnaire and medical charts. The participants were also asked to complete the Index of Fairness and Index of Effectiveness tools as well as a structured questionnaire on satisfaction with care. Simple and multiple linear regressions were performed.
Although several factors were found to affect satisfaction with care when taken independently, perceived fairness was the stronger predictor of both satisfaction with treatment (β =.234; p = .022) and satisfaction with decision-making involvement (β =.360; p < .001) when controlling for confounders.
Our results point to the paramount importance of developing and implementing interventions that promote procedural fairness in psychiatric treatment and thereby improve patient satisfaction while reducing the risk of disengagement with care.
患者对护理的满意度被广泛认为是精神卫生保健质量的最重要指标之一。它可以影响几个治疗结果,如治疗依从性和对服务的参与度。同时,作为一个自身的结果,对护理的满意度也受到几个因素的影响,首先是受到强制。本研究的主要目的是检验是否认为治疗压力是公平和有效的,即使比正式强制措施更能正面影响患者满意度。
在全球范围内,对 133 名自愿和非自愿住院患者进行了访谈。通过结构化问卷和病历收集了社会人口统计学和临床特征,包括以前经历正式强制和住院法律地位的历史。还要求参与者完成公平指数和有效指数工具以及关于护理满意度的结构化问卷。进行了简单和多元线性回归分析。
尽管在单独考虑时发现了几个影响护理满意度的因素,但在控制混杂因素后,感知到的公平性是治疗满意度(β=.234;p=.022)和决策参与满意度(β=.360;p<.001)的更强预测指标。
我们的结果表明,制定和实施促进精神病治疗程序公平性的干预措施至关重要,这可以提高患者满意度,同时降低护理脱失的风险。