• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低价值口服沙丁胺醇的配药与从医疗补助计划首选药物清单中移除的关联。

Association between dispensing of low-value oral albuterol and removal from Medicaid preferred drug lists.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Avenue, MC 2007, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 26;22(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07955-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-022-07955-x
PMID:35473608
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9044602/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral albuterol has worse efficacy and side effects compared with inhaled albuterol, and thus its use has been discouraged for decades. Drug inclusion or exclusion on formularies have been associated with reductions in low-value care. This study examines dispensing of oral albuterol and inclusion of oral albuterol on state Medicaid drug formularies--Preferred Drug Lists (PDLs). It also evaluates the association between removal of oral albuterol from the PDL and dispensing levels.

METHODS

This quasi-experimental study determined oral albuterol inclusion on PDLs and dispensing between 2011 and 2018, using Medicaid program websites and the State Drug Utilization Database. Using a difference-in-differences model, we examine the association between removal of oral albuterol from Arkansas' Medicaid PDL in 2014 and dispensing of this drug through Medicaid, with Iowa as a control state. The outcome measure was the percent of all albuterol prescriptions that were for oral albuterol.

RESULTS

A total of 28 state Medicaid PDLs included at least one formulation of oral albuterol in 2018. In 2018, 179,446 oral albuterol prescriptions were dispensed to Medicaid beneficiaries nationally. Medicaid programs paid approximately $3.0 million for oral albuterol prescriptions in 2018. Removal of oral albuterol syrup from the Arkansas PDL in March 2014 was associated with a more rapid decline in dispensing compared with Iowa which maintained this medication on their PDL.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that removal of low-value medications, such as oral albuterol, from PDLs may be one avenue by which state Medicaid programs can reduce wasteful spending while improving guideline-based care.

摘要

背景

与吸入用沙丁胺醇相比,口服沙丁胺醇的疗效和副作用更差,因此几十年来一直不鼓励使用。药物是否纳入或排除在处方集与低价值医疗保健的减少有关。本研究检查了口服沙丁胺醇的配药情况和州医疗补助计划(Medicaid)药物处方集(首选药物清单(PDL))中口服沙丁胺醇的纳入情况。它还评估了从 PDL 中删除口服沙丁胺醇与配药水平之间的关系。

方法

本准实验研究使用医疗补助计划网站和州药物利用数据库,确定了 2011 年至 2018 年期间 PDL 上的口服沙丁胺醇纳入情况和配药情况。使用差异中的差异模型,我们检查了 2014 年阿肯色州医疗补助 PDL 中删除口服沙丁胺醇与通过医疗补助开这种药物之间的关联,爱荷华州作为对照州。结果衡量标准是所有沙丁胺醇处方中口服沙丁胺醇的百分比。

结果

2018 年,共有 28 个州医疗补助 PDL 纳入了至少一种口服沙丁胺醇制剂。2018 年,全国向医疗补助受益人开出了 179446 张口服沙丁胺醇处方。2018 年,医疗补助计划为口服沙丁胺醇处方支付了约 300 万美元。2014 年 3 月,阿肯色州 PDL 中删除口服沙丁胺醇糖浆与爱荷华州相比,与爱荷华州相比,配药的下降速度更快,爱荷华州仍然保留了这种药物。

结论

研究结果表明,从 PDL 中删除低价值药物,如口服沙丁胺醇,可能是州医疗补助计划减少浪费性支出同时改善基于指南的护理的一种途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ece/9044602/265da12930c9/12913_2022_7955_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ece/9044602/265da12930c9/12913_2022_7955_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ece/9044602/265da12930c9/12913_2022_7955_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between dispensing of low-value oral albuterol and removal from Medicaid preferred drug lists.低价值口服沙丁胺醇的配药与从医疗补助计划首选药物清单中移除的关联。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 26;22(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07955-x.
2
Which physicians are affected most by Medicaid preferred drug lists for statins and antihypertensives?哪些医生受他汀类药物和抗高血压药物的医疗补助优选药物清单影响最大?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24 Suppl 3:27-40. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624003-00003.
3
Medicaid preferred drug lists' costs to physicians.医疗补助计划首选药物清单给医生带来的成本。
Med Care. 2008 Jan;46(1):9-16. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31814b8245.
4
The Impact of Medicaid Preferred Drug Lists on Utilization and Costs of Antipsychotic Medication.医疗补助计划优先药物清单对抗精神病药物使用及成本的影响
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2013 May 24;1(1):54-61. doi: 10.36469/9853. eCollection 2013.
5
Physicians' prescribing responses to a restricted formulary: the impact of Medicaid preferred drug lists in Illinois and Louisiana.医生对受限处方集的开药反应:伊利诺伊州和路易斯安那州医疗补助优选药物清单的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Jan;11 Spec No:SP14-20.
6
Preferred drug lists: potential impact on healthcare economics.首选药物清单:对医疗保健经济学的潜在影响。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(2):403-13. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s926.
7
How similar are states' Medicaid preferred drug lists?各州的医疗补助优先药品清单有多相似?
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Nov;14(11 Suppl):SP46-52.
8
Applying the essential medicines concept to US preferred drug lists.将基本药物概念应用于美国首选药物清单。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Aug;101(8):1444-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300054. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
9
Preferred drug lists and Medicaid prescriptions.首选药物清单和医疗补助处方。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24 Suppl 3:55-63. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624003-00005.
10
The effect of access restrictions on the vintage of drugs used by Medicaid enrollees.准入限制对医疗补助计划参保者所使用药品年份的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Jan;11 Spec No:SP7-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Alcohol Use Disorder Medication Coverage and Utilization Management in Medicaid Managed Care Plans.医疗补助管理式医疗计划中酒精使用障碍药物的覆盖范围及使用管理
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250695. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0695.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences Between Managed Care and Fee-for-Service Medicaid in the Use of Generics for High-Rebate Drugs: The Cases of Insulin Glargine and Glatiramer.管理式医疗与按服务收费的医疗补助制度在高回扣药物使用仿制药方面的差异:以甘精胰岛素和格拉替雷为例。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Feb;26(2):154-159. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.2.154.
2
Differences in the Receipt of Low-Value Services Between Publicly and Privately Insured Children.公众保险和私人保险的儿童获得低价值服务的差异。
Pediatrics. 2020 Feb;145(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2325. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
Waste in the US Health Care System: Estimated Costs and Potential for Savings.
美国医疗体系中的浪费:估计成本和节约潜力。
JAMA. 2019 Oct 15;322(15):1501-1509. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13978.
4
The Effect of Florida Medicaid's State-Mandated Formulary Provision on Prescription Drug Use and Health Plan Costs in a Medicaid Managed Care Plan.佛罗里达州医疗补助计划的州定处方集规定对医疗补助管理式医疗计划中处方药使用和健康计划成本的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Feb;24(2):124-131. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.2.124.
5
Methadone Prescribing and Overdose and the Association with Medicaid Preferred Drug List Policies - United States, 2007-2014.美沙酮处方与过量用药及其与医疗补助优选药物清单政策的关联——美国,2007 - 2014年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Mar 31;66(12):320-323. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6612a2.
6
High Prices for Drugs With Generic Alternatives: The Curious Case of Duexis.有通用替代药物的高价药品:都克昔的奇案。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):305-306. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8423.
7
Use of Low-Value Pediatric Services Among the Commercially Insured.商业保险人群中低价值儿科服务的使用情况。
Pediatrics. 2016 Dec;138(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1809.
8
Low-Value Health Care Services in a Commercially Insured Population.商业保险人群中的低价值医疗服务
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Oct 1;176(10):1567-1571. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5031.
9
It is time to stop prescribing oral salbutamol.是时候停止开具口服沙丁胺醇的处方了。
Aust Fam Physician. 2016 Apr;45(4):245-7.
10
Measuring low-value care in Medicare.衡量医疗保险中的低价值医疗服务。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jul;174(7):1067-76. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1541.