• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层和社区环境中的精神卫生保健:超越世卫组织精神卫生差距行动规划 (mhGAP) 干预指南的证据。

Mental healthcare in primary and community-based settings: evidence beyond the WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide.

机构信息

Health Service and Population Research, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK

Département des sciences de la santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.

出版信息

Evid Based Ment Health. 2022 Dec;25(e1):e1-e7. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300401. Epub 2022 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1136/ebmental-2021-300401
PMID:35473750
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9811100/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The WHO's Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) has been widely used in low and middle-income countries. We reviewed literature describing interventions and training programmes beyond the mhGAP-IG, in primary healthcare (PHC) and community-based healthcare (CBH).

DESIGN

We searched studies excluded from our updated mhGAP-IG systematic review, and included in other relevant systematic reviews, for evidence and experience of initiatives integrating mental health into PHC and CBH. Our 24 November 2020 mhGAP-IG search encompassed MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS, ScieELO, Cochrane, PubMed databases, 3ie and Google Scholar. Although heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis, we descriptively summarised the evidence-base.

RESULTS

Out of 1827 results, we identified 208 relevant records. They described randomised controlled trials of mental health interventions (98 studies, n=55 523 participants), non-randomised studies measuring clinical outcomes (22 studies, n=7405), training outcomes (36 studies, n=12 280) and implementation outcomes (21 studies, n=1090), plus descriptive accounts (18 studies, n=2526), baseline surveys and exploratory studies (6 studies, n=17 093) and commentaries (7 studies). Most (40%) were conducted in the African region, region of the Americas (16%), and South-East Asia (13%). Randomised and non-randomised studies reported improved symptoms, substance use, functioning, parenting and child outcomes. Non-randomised studies reported improved clinical knowledge, confidence and skills following training.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature beyond the mhGAP-IG is extensive and shares common findings. Future priorities are less-studied regions, interventions for severe mental illness, exploring ways that mhGAP-IG and alternative approaches complement each other in different contexts and scaling-up mental health integration.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017068459.

摘要

目的

世界卫生组织的《精神卫生差距行动规划干预指南》(mhGAP-IG)已在中低收入国家广泛使用。我们回顾了描述 mhGAP-IG 以外的初级卫生保健(PHC)和社区卫生保健(CBH)中精神卫生干预措施和培训方案的文献。

设计

我们搜索了从我们更新的 mhGAP-IG 系统评价中排除的研究,并纳入了其他相关系统评价,以获取将精神卫生纳入 PHC 和 CBH 的举措的证据和经验。我们于 2020 年 11 月 24 日对 mhGAP-IG 进行了搜索,涵盖了 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、Web of Knowledge、Scopus、CINAHL、LILACS、ScieELO、Cochrane、PubMed 数据库、3ie 和 Google Scholar。尽管异质性妨碍了荟萃分析,但我们对证据基础进行了描述性总结。

结果

在 1827 项结果中,我们确定了 208 份相关记录。它们描述了精神卫生干预措施的随机对照试验(98 项研究,n=55523 名参与者)、测量临床结局的非随机研究(22 项研究,n=7405)、培训结局(36 项研究,n=12280)和实施结局(21 项研究,n=1090),以及描述性报告(18 项研究,n=2526)、基线调查和探索性研究(6 项研究,n=17093)和评论(7 项研究)。大多数(40%)研究在非洲地区、美洲地区(16%)和东南亚(13%)进行。随机和非随机研究报告了症状、物质使用、功能、育儿和儿童结局的改善。非随机研究报告了培训后临床知识、信心和技能的提高。

结论

mhGAP-IG 以外的文献广泛存在,并具有共同的发现。未来的优先事项是研究较少的地区、严重精神疾病的干预措施,探索 mhGAP-IG 和替代方法在不同背景下相互补充的方式,以及扩大精神卫生一体化。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42017068459。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fb8/10231505/ec75149a0885/ebmental-2021-300401f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fb8/10231505/ec75149a0885/ebmental-2021-300401f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fb8/10231505/ec75149a0885/ebmental-2021-300401f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Mental healthcare in primary and community-based settings: evidence beyond the WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide.基层和社区环境中的精神卫生保健:超越世卫组织精神卫生差距行动规划 (mhGAP) 干预指南的证据。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2022 Dec;25(e1):e1-e7. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300401. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
2
WHO mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide: updated systematic review on evidence and impact.世界卫生组织精神卫生差距行动规划(mhGAP)干预指南:关于证据和影响的最新系统评价
Evid Based Ment Health. 2021 Apr 26;24(3):124-30. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300254.
3
WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide: a systematic review of evidence from low and middle-income countries.世界卫生组织心理健康差距行动规划(mhGAP)干预指南:来自中低收入国家的证据系统评价。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Feb;21(1):30-34. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102750. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Implementation and use of the Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG): A review of the grey literature.《心理健康差距行动规划干预指南(mhGAP-IG)的实施和使用:灰色文献回顾》。
J Glob Health. 2021 Apr 17;11:04022. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.04022.
6
WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG): the first pre-service training study.世界卫生组织精神卫生差距行动规划干预指南(mhGAP-IG):首次职前培训研究
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 Jun 29;14:47. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00379-2. eCollection 2020.
7
Adaptation of the World Health Organization Electronic Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide App for Mobile Devices in Nepal and Nigeria: Protocol for a Feasibility Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.世界卫生组织电子心理健康差距行动方案干预指南应用程序在尼泊尔和尼日利亚移动设备上的适配:一项可行性整群随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jun 15;10(6):e24115. doi: 10.2196/24115.
8
Feasibility and effectiveness of nurses and clinical officers in implementing the WHO mhGAP intervention guide: Pilot study in Makueni County, Kenya.护士和临床官员实施世卫组织 mhGAP 干预指南的可行性和效果:肯尼亚马库埃尼县的试点研究。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2019 Jul-Aug;59:20-29. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
9
Building system capacity for the integration of mental health at the level of primary care in Tunisia: a study protocol in global mental health.构建突尼斯初级保健层面心理健康整合的系统能力:一项全球心理健康研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-1992-y.
10
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of barber-facilitated "Doing What Matters in Times of Stress" intervention among urban literate youths in Western Kenya: A cluster randomised trial.肯尼亚西部城市有文化青年中,理发师协助开展的“压力之下做重要之事”干预措施的效果:一项整群随机试验
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jun 18;5(6):e0004712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004712. eCollection 2025.
2
Community-based Collaborative Care for Serious Mental Illness: A Rapid Qualitative Evidence Synthesis of Health Care Providers' Experiences and Perspectives.基于社区的严重精神疾病协作护理:对医疗保健提供者经验与观点的快速定性证据综合分析
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1007/s10597-025-01459-8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of a WHO self-help psychological intervention for preventing mental disorders among Syrian refugees in Turkey: a randomized controlled trial.世界卫生组织自助心理干预对预防土耳其境内叙利亚难民精神障碍的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
World Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;21(1):88-95. doi: 10.1002/wps.20939.
2
Primary-level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low- and middle-income countries.基层工作者干预措施在中低收入国家对精神障碍和痛苦患者的护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 5;8(8):CD009149. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009149.pub3.
3
Effectiveness of Self-Help Plus in Preventing Mental Disorders in Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Western Europe: A Multinational Randomized Controlled Trial.
A Digital Tool (Technology-Assisted Problem Management Plus) for Lay Health Workers to Address Common Mental Health Disorders: Co-production and Usability Study in Pakistan.
一种供非专业卫生工作者应对常见精神健康障碍的数字工具(技术辅助问题管理升级版):巴基斯坦的合作生产与可用性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 28;9:e59414. doi: 10.2196/59414.
4
Advancing Global Health Through Primary Care Physician Education on Suicide Prevention.通过初级保健医生的自杀预防教育来促进全球健康。
Ann Glob Health. 2024 May 23;90(1):32. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4410. eCollection 2024.
5
Evaluation of system based psychological first aid training on the mental health proficiency of emergency medical first responders to natural disasters in China: a cluster randomised controlled trial.基于系统的心理急救培训对中国自然灾害急救医疗第一响应者心理健康能力的评估:一项集群随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 6;14(5):e078750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078750.
6
Factors influencing integration of mental health screening and treatment at HIV clinic settings in Cameroon: a qualitative study of health providers' perspectives.喀麦隆艾滋病毒诊所环境中影响心理健康筛查与治疗整合的因素:一项关于医疗服务提供者观点的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 24;24(1):519. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10775-w.
7
The knowledge of primary health care professionals regarding mental health: diagnosis by mhGAP.基层医疗保健专业人员对精神卫生的认识:mhGAP 诊断。
Rev Saude Publica. 2024 Apr 15;57Suppl 3(Suppl 3):4s. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005272. eCollection 2024.
8
What I stand for as editor.作为编辑,我的立场是什么。
BMJ Ment Health. 2023 Feb;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300664.
9
Pregnant women and health workers' perspectives on perinatal mental health and intimate partner violence in rural Ethiopia: a qualitative interview study.农村埃塞俄比亚孕妇和卫生工作者对围产期心理健康和亲密伴侣暴力的看法:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jan 28;23(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05352-8.
10
Psychiatric diagnosis and treatment in the 21st century: paradigm shifts or power shifts?21世纪的精神科诊断与治疗:是范式转变还是权力转移?
World Psychiatry. 2022 Oct;21(3):334-335. doi: 10.1002/wps.21000.
自助加预防在西欧难民和寻求庇护者中预防精神障碍的效果:一项多国随机对照试验。
Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(6):403-414. doi: 10.1159/000517504. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
4
Where are the regional gaps in the scientific evidence?科学证据中的区域差距在哪里?
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;8(7):557-559. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00157-7.
5
WHO mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide: updated systematic review on evidence and impact.世界卫生组织精神卫生差距行动规划(mhGAP)干预指南:关于证据和影响的最新系统评价
Evid Based Ment Health. 2021 Apr 26;24(3):124-30. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300254.
6
Implementation and use of the Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG): A review of the grey literature.《心理健康差距行动规划干预指南(mhGAP-IG)的实施和使用:灰色文献回顾》。
J Glob Health. 2021 Apr 17;11:04022. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.04022.
7
COVID-19 mental health impact and responses in low-income and middle-income countries: reimagining global mental health.新冠疫情对中低收入国家的精神健康影响及应对措施:重新构想全球精神卫生。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;8(6):535-550. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00025-0. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
8
Engaging culture and context in mhGAP implementation: fostering reflexive deliberation in practice.在 mhGAP 实施中关注文化和背景:促进实践中的反思性思考。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Sep;5(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002689.
9
Feasibility of Group Problem Management Plus (PM+) to improve mental health and functioning of adults in earthquake-affected communities in Nepal.群组问题管理 Plus(PM+)改善尼泊尔地震灾区成年人心理健康和功能的可行性。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 May 26;29:e130. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000414.
10
Evidence for efficacy of psychosocial interventions in LMICs.中低收入国家心理社会干预措施有效性的证据。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;7(2):113-114. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30531-0. Epub 2020 Jan 13.