Solou Konstantina, Tyllianakis Minos, Kouzelis Antonis, Lakoumentas John, Panagopoulos Andreas
Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, GRC.
Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, GRC.
Cureus. 2022 Mar 21;14(3):e23373. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23373. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Background Hip fractures are an increasingly common injury among older people who usually experience significantly worse mobility, independence in function, health, quality of life, and high rates of institutionalization. Studies have shown that only 40-60% of participants recover their pre-fracture level of mobility and ability to perform instrumental activities of daily living, while for those who are independent in self-care prior to the fracture, 20-60% still require assistance for various tasks one or two years after the fracture. As the cumulative incidence of a second hip fracture has been estimated to reach 8.4%, prevention of the second hip fracture is a major concern of the health system and the society focused mainly on lifestyle modifications, osteoporotic treatment, and fall-prevention strategies. The aim of the present study was to compare morbidity/mortality, functional results, and type of recovery between the first and second hip fractures in elderly patients. Methods Patients with a contralateral hip fracture were prospectively recruited during a three-year period (2016-2019). Level of independence, gait aids, type of rehabilitation, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scale were evaluated at admission for the second fracture and at the last reexamination. Results Twenty-seven out of 33 patients, aged 87.93±6.6, underwent surgery for contralateral hip fracture and followed up for 42.52±16.46 months; the mean interval between the two fractures was 39.63 months. The HHS averaged 86.19±12.18 and 59.01±32.83 and the WOMAC 86.37±12.09 and 68.22±26.18 before and after the second fracture, respectively. The mortality rate was 37.03%, 14.8±12.93 months after the second operation, with a significant relationship between the mortality time and the interval between fractures (p=0.028). Twelve and 14 of the patients received geriatric nursing care after the first and second fracture, respectively, without significant improvement in their functional results compared to home care. Mobility of nursing care patients after the second fracture was significantly improved (p=0.019). Conclusions Mortality is higher in the second year after the second hip fracture and strongly correlated with the time interval between fractures. A higher possibility to return in previous mobility status occurs after geriatric nursing care.
髋部骨折在老年人中越来越常见,这些患者通常在行动能力、功能独立性、健康状况、生活质量方面显著变差,且机构化比率很高。研究表明,只有40%-60%的参与者恢复到骨折前的行动能力和进行日常生活工具性活动的能力,而对于那些在骨折前能够自理的患者,20%-60%在骨折后一到两年仍需要在各种任务上得到帮助。由于估计第二次髋部骨折的累积发生率达到8.4%,预防第二次髋部骨折是卫生系统和社会主要关注的问题,主要集中在生活方式改变、骨质疏松症治疗和预防跌倒策略上。本研究的目的是比较老年患者第一次和第二次髋部骨折后的发病率/死亡率、功能结果和恢复类型。
在三年期间(2016 - 2019年)前瞻性招募对侧髋部骨折患者。在第二次骨折入院时和最后一次复查时评估独立水平、助行器、康复类型、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况、Harris髋关节评分(HHS)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数(WOMAC)量表。
33例患者中,年龄87.93±6.6岁,27例接受了对侧髋部骨折手术,并随访42.52±16.46个月;两次骨折之间的平均间隔为39.63个月。第二次骨折前后HHS平均分别为86.19±12.18和59.01±32.83,WOMAC分别为86.37±12.09和68.22±26.18。死亡率为37.03%,在第二次手术后14.8±12.93个月,死亡时间与骨折间隔之间存在显著关系(p = 0.028)。第一次和第二次骨折后分别有12例和14例患者接受老年护理,与居家护理相比,其功能结果无显著改善。第二次骨折后接受护理的患者的行动能力有显著改善(p = 0.019)。
第二次髋部骨折后第二年死亡率较高,且与骨折间隔时间密切相关。老年护理后恢复到先前行动状态的可能性更高。