Nguyen Bao Tu Thai, Huang Shu-Wei, Kuo Yi-Jie, Nguyen Tan Thanh, Chen Yu-Pin
The International Ph.D. Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho, Vietnam.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2024 Oct 22;15:21514593241293645. doi: 10.1177/21514593241293645. eCollection 2024.
Hip fracture is particularly seen in elderly patients with frailty and osteoporosis and leads to diminished functional independence and quality of life. Despite the susceptibility of these patients to a second hip fracture (SHF), the literature insufficiently discussed its impact leading to poor outcomes. This study aims to directly assess the outcomes of elderly patients with initial hip fractures (IHF) vs those experiencing an SHF within a well-matched group with similar characteristics.
This case-control study gathered data from the clinical hip fracture registry at a medical center from 2019 to 2022. Patients with SHF were matched with those with IHF in a 1:2 ratio according to the similarity of age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index classification. Demographics at admission, baseline characteristics, and 1-year postoperative outcome were compared between the SHF and IHF groups.
Thirty-two SHF patients were matched with 64 IHF patients (81.25% of women, median age of 86 years). Anthropometric measurements and socioeconomic factors were not significantly different between the two groups. No differences in baseline characteristics were observed, except IHF patients had a significantly lower T-score than SHF patients (-3.98 vs. -3.31, = 0.016). At one-year follow-up, despite a notable decrease in Barthel Index scores and an uptick in EQ-5D measures among the patients, the IHF and SHF groups demonstrated similar quality of life and a high level of activities of daily living.
In this case-control study, after matching for age, sex, and comorbidities, an SHF did not indicate poorer outcomes than an IHF, providing a more optimistic outlook for the patients and healthcare providers.
Despite the significant challenges presented by hip fracture, the one-year postoperative outcomes did not differ between IHF and SHF patients, suggesting that SHF is not an independent predictor of poor outcomes following hip fracture in the elderly population.
髋部骨折在体弱和患有骨质疏松症的老年患者中尤为常见,会导致功能独立性和生活质量下降。尽管这些患者易发生二次髋部骨折(SHF),但文献对其影响的讨论不足,导致预后不佳。本研究旨在直接评估初次髋部骨折(IHF)老年患者与在特征相似的匹配良好组中发生SHF的患者的预后。
本病例对照研究收集了2019年至2022年某医疗中心临床髋部骨折登记处的数据。根据年龄、性别和Charlson合并症指数分类,将SHF患者与IHF患者按1:2的比例进行匹配。比较SHF组和IHF组入院时的人口统计学、基线特征和术后1年的结局。
32例SHF患者与64例IHF患者匹配(81.25%为女性,中位年龄86岁)。两组间人体测量学指标和社会经济因素无显著差异。除IHF患者的T值显著低于SHF患者外(-3.98 vs. -3.31,P = 0.016),未观察到基线特征的差异。在1年随访时,尽管患者的Barthel指数评分显著下降且EQ-5D指标有所上升,但IHF组和SHF组的生活质量相似,日常生活活动水平较高。
在本病例对照研究中,在匹配年龄、性别和合并症后,SHF的预后并不比IHF差,这为患者和医疗服务提供者提供了更乐观的前景。
尽管髋部骨折带来了重大挑战,但IHF和SHF患者术后1年的结局并无差异,这表明SHF并非老年人群髋部骨折预后不良的独立预测因素。