Dunnigan Movement Analysis Lab, School of Health Sciences, University of Evansville, IN.
Biodynamics Laboratory, Department of Applied Physiology, Health, and Clinical Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
J Athl Train. 2023 Feb 1;58(2):128-135. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0602.21.
Rehabilitative exercises alleviate pain in patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP); however, no researchers have analyzed the cartilage response after a bout of those athletic activities in patients with PFP.
To determine if a single session of rehabilitative exercises alters femoral cartilage morphology.
Crossover study.
Research laboratory.
Twelve participants with PFP (age = 21.0 ± 2.0 years, height = 1.72 ± 0.1 m, mass = 68.7 ± 12.6 kg) and 12 matched healthy participants (age = 21.3 ± 2.8 years, height = 1.71 ± 0.1 m, mass = 65.9 ± 12.2 kg) were enrolled.
INTERVENTION(S): Participants completed treadmill running, lower extremity strengthening exercises, and plyometric exercises for 30 minutes each.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Patient-reported outcomes on the visual analog scale, Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Patellofemoral Pain and Osteoarthritis were collected. Femoral cartilage ultrasonographic images were obtained at 140° of knee flexion. Ultrasound images were segmented into medial and lateral images using the intercondylar notch. Medial and lateral cartilage cross-sectional area (mm2) and echo intensity (EI), defined as the average grayscale from 0 to 255, were analyzed by ImageJ software. The difference between loading conditions was calculated using repeated-measures analysis of variance. The Spearman correlation was calculated to find the association between the cartilage percentage change (Δ%) and patient-reported outcomes.
Pain increased in the PFP group after all loading conditions (P values < .007). No differences were found in cartilage cross-sectional area or EI alteration between or within groups (P values > .06). The KOOS was negatively associated with the Δ% of the lateral femoral cartilage EI after plyometric loading (ρ = -0.87, P = .001), and the AKPS score was positively correlated with the Δ% of lateral femoral cartilage EI (ρ = 0.57, P = .05).
Ultrasound imaging did not identify cartilaginous deformation after all loading conditions. However, because lateral cartilaginous EI changes were associated with the AKPS and KOOS score, those questionnaires may be useful for monitoring changes in femoral cartilage health.
康复运动可以减轻髌股疼痛(PFP)患者的疼痛;然而,尚无研究分析 PFP 患者进行一系列此类运动后的软骨反应。
确定单次康复运动是否会改变股骨软骨形态。
交叉研究。
研究实验室。
12 名 PFP 患者(年龄=21.0±2.0 岁,身高=1.72±0.1 m,体重=68.7±12.6 kg)和 12 名匹配的健康参与者(年龄=21.3±2.8 岁,身高=1.71±0.1 m,体重=65.9±12.2 kg)被纳入研究。
参与者分别完成了 30 分钟的跑步机跑步、下肢强化练习和增强式练习。
患者使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、前膝痛量表(AKPS)、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)以及髌股疼痛和骨关节炎的 KOOS 进行评估。在膝关节屈曲 140°时获得股骨软骨超声图像。使用髁间切迹将超声图像分割为内侧和外侧图像。使用 ImageJ 软件分析内侧和外侧软骨的横截面积(mm2)和回声强度(EI),EI 定义为 0 至 255 的平均灰度值。使用重复测量方差分析计算加载条件之间的差异。使用斯皮尔曼相关性分析来发现软骨百分比变化(Δ%)与患者报告结果之间的关联。
在所有加载条件下,PFP 组的疼痛均增加(P 值<.007)。组间或组内的软骨横截面积或 EI 变化无差异(P 值>.06)。在增强式负荷后,KOOS 与外侧股骨软骨 EI 的 Δ%呈负相关(ρ=-0.87,P=.001),AKPS 评分与外侧股骨软骨 EI 的 Δ%呈正相关(ρ=0.57,P=.05)。
超声成像未在所有加载条件下发现软骨变形。然而,由于外侧软骨 EI 变化与 AKPS 和 KOOS 评分相关,因此这些问卷可能有助于监测股骨软骨健康状况的变化。