• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联合国对监护和代理决策的挑战。

The UN Challenge to Guardianship and Surrogate Decision-Making.

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 Mar;52(2):4-6. doi: 10.1002/hast.1348.

DOI:10.1002/hast.1348
PMID:35476360
Abstract

In 2006, the United Nations issued the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The Convention, together with an accompanying commentary, urges governments to abandon laws authorizing guardianship and substitute decision-making for people with intellectual disabilities and to replace them with supportive decision-making laws that give all individuals the freedom to make choices reflecting their "will and preferences." Although critics point to ethical and legal problems with this approach, the Convention and commentary offer guidance to clinicians, ethicists, and others involved in evaluating medical decision-making. Whether or not it leads to formal legal action, the Convention rightly urges us to give people with cognitive impairments a greater role in decisions about their lives.

摘要

2006 年,联合国发布了《残疾人权利公约》。该公约及其配套评注敦促各国政府废除授权监护和替代决策的法律,代之以支持性决策法律,使所有人都有自由做出反映其“意愿和偏好”的选择。尽管批评者指出这种方法存在伦理和法律问题,但该公约和评注为参与评估医疗决策的临床医生、伦理学家和其他人提供了指导。无论是否导致正式的法律行动,该公约都正确地敦促我们让认知障碍者在涉及他们生活的决策中发挥更大的作用。

相似文献

1
The UN Challenge to Guardianship and Surrogate Decision-Making.联合国对监护和代理决策的挑战。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 Mar;52(2):4-6. doi: 10.1002/hast.1348.
2
The impact of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on Victorian guardianship practice.《联合国残疾人权利公约》对维多利亚州监护实践的影响。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(12):2806-2814. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1836680. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
3
Getting the Balance Right: Conceptual Considerations Concerning Legal Capacity and Supported Decision-Making.把握正确平衡:关于法律行为能力与辅助决策的概念性思考
J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Sep;13(3):381-93. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9727-z. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
4
Supported decision-making and personal autonomy for persons with intellectual disabilities: article 12 of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.为智障人士提供支持性决策和个人自主:《联合国残疾人权利公约》第十二条
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Winter;41(4):792-806, Table of Contents. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12090.
5
Legal capacity under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.《残疾人权利公约》规定的法律行为能力。
J Law Med. 2012 Sep;20(1):22-7.
6
Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward.《联合国残疾人权利公约》第十二条对精神残疾人的不良后果及可供选择的前进道路
J Med Ethics. 2018 Apr;44(4):226-233. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104414. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
7
Between the convention and conventional practice: Israeli social workers' recommendations regarding the legal capacity of people with disabilities.在惯例与常规做法之间:以色列社会工作者关于残疾人法律能力的建议。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2022 May;35(3):826-833. doi: 10.1111/jar.12986. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
8
An international comparison of legal frameworks for supported and substitute decision-making in mental health services.精神卫生服务中支持性和替代性决策法律框架的国际比较。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016 Jan-Feb;44:30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.029. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
9
Participation and service access rights for people with intellectual disability: a role for law?智障人士的参与权和服务获取权:法律能发挥作用吗?
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2013 Mar;38(1):59-69. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2012.738810. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
10
Guardianship law versus supported decision-making policies: Perceptions of persons with intellectual or psychiatric disabilities and parents.监护法与支持性决策政策:智力或精神残疾者及其父母的看法。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2016;86(5):486-99. doi: 10.1037/ort0000125. Epub 2015 Dec 14.