Jakobeit C
Ultraschall Med. 1986 Dec;7(6):290-2. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1013969.
To compare the accuracy of both ultrasound-guided puncture methods 417 patients were examined over a period of 5 years (retrospectively). Our results show no significant difference in accuracy between free-hand puncture and biopsy transducer puncture. It may be that puncture of very small (less than 2 cm) und very deep (greater than 8 cm) targets by biopsy transducer is a little more advantageous. In our opinion free-hand puncture is time-saving. Free-hand puncture allows a better visibility of the biopsy-needle artefact and is better practicable in case of anomalies of body structure. We did not observe complications worth mentioning with any of these two methods. We prefer free-hand puncture.
为比较两种超声引导穿刺方法的准确性,我们回顾性地检查了417例患者,时间跨度为5年。我们的结果显示,徒手穿刺和活检探头穿刺在准确性上没有显著差异。活检探头穿刺对于非常小(小于2厘米)且非常深(大于8厘米)的目标进行穿刺可能略具优势。在我们看来,徒手穿刺节省时间。徒手穿刺能更好地观察活检针伪像,并且在身体结构异常的情况下更易于操作。我们在这两种方法中均未观察到值得一提的并发症。我们更倾向于徒手穿刺。