Suppr超能文献

[超声引导穿刺操作:徒手穿刺与探头活检穿刺。5年经验]

[Ultrasound-controlled puncture procedures: free-hand puncture versus transducer biopsy puncture. 5 years' experience].

作者信息

Jakobeit C

出版信息

Ultraschall Med. 1986 Dec;7(6):290-2. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1013969.

Abstract

To compare the accuracy of both ultrasound-guided puncture methods 417 patients were examined over a period of 5 years (retrospectively). Our results show no significant difference in accuracy between free-hand puncture and biopsy transducer puncture. It may be that puncture of very small (less than 2 cm) und very deep (greater than 8 cm) targets by biopsy transducer is a little more advantageous. In our opinion free-hand puncture is time-saving. Free-hand puncture allows a better visibility of the biopsy-needle artefact and is better practicable in case of anomalies of body structure. We did not observe complications worth mentioning with any of these two methods. We prefer free-hand puncture.

摘要

为比较两种超声引导穿刺方法的准确性,我们回顾性地检查了417例患者,时间跨度为5年。我们的结果显示,徒手穿刺和活检探头穿刺在准确性上没有显著差异。活检探头穿刺对于非常小(小于2厘米)且非常深(大于8厘米)的目标进行穿刺可能略具优势。在我们看来,徒手穿刺节省时间。徒手穿刺能更好地观察活检针伪像,并且在身体结构异常的情况下更易于操作。我们在这两种方法中均未观察到值得一提的并发症。我们更倾向于徒手穿刺。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验