Ribas Schelyne, Aburachid Layla M C, Marôco João, Mazzardo Tatiane, de Oliveira Castro Henrique, Greco Pablo Juan
67826Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso - UFMT, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil.
Instituto Universitário de Ciências Psicológicas, Lisboa, Portugal.
Percept Mot Skills. 2022 Aug;129(4):1193-1209. doi: 10.1177/00315125221098318. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
Our purpose with this study was to analyze construct validity evidence for the Motor Coordination Test with Ball (MCTB). Our participant sample included 1620 students (741 girls; 879 boys) aged between 10-12 years. Evidence for construct-validity of the four tasks using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and adequacy indices confirmed a good fit of a final two-dimensional model (BTS = .000; KMO = .83; loading .53 to .91; communalities ranging from .31 to .86; explained variance of 63.5%; goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = .99; adjusted GFI (AGFI) = .97; RMSR = .03), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (X/df = 4.9; GFI = .97; comparative fit index (CFI) = .92; TLI = .90; Root-Mean-Square Error of Aproximation (RMSEA) = .03). We concluded that, in a Brazilian sample, the MCTB has good construct validity for motor coordination tests with balls; this helps qualify this test for use in schools and in the sports context.
我们开展这项研究的目的是分析球类运动协调测试（MCTB）的结构效度证据。我们的参与者样本包括1620名年龄在10至12岁之间的学生（741名女生；879名男生）。使用探索性因素分析（EFA）和适配指标对四项任务的结构效度进行的证据分析证实，最终的二维模型拟合良好（BTS = .000；KMO = .83；载荷从.53至.91；共同度范围为.31至.86；解释方差为63.5%；拟合优度指数（GFI） = .99；调整后的GFI（AGFI） = .97；均方根残差（RMSR） = .03），以及验证性因素分析（CFA）（X/df = 4.9；GFI = .97；比较拟合指数（CFI） = .92；TLI = .90；近似均方根误差（RMSEA） = .03）。我们得出结论，在巴西样本中，MCTB在球类运动协调测试方面具有良好的结构效度；这有助于该测试在学校和体育环境中得到应用。
