使用球进行的运动协调测试（MCTB）中的结构效度证据。

Construct Validity Evidence in the Motor Coordination Test with Ball - MCTB.

作者信息

Ribas Schelyne, Aburachid Layla M C, Marôco João, Mazzardo Tatiane, de Oliveira Castro Henrique, Greco Pablo Juan

机构信息

67826Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso - UFMT, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil.

Instituto Universitário de Ciências Psicológicas, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2022 Aug;129(4):1193-1209. doi: 10.1177/00315125221098318. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1177/00315125221098318

PMID:35477325

Abstract

Our purpose with this study was to analyze construct validity evidence for the Motor Coordination Test with Ball (MCTB). Our participant sample included 1620 students (741 girls; 879 boys) aged between 10-12 years. Evidence for construct-validity of the four tasks using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and adequacy indices confirmed a good fit of a final two-dimensional model (BTS = .000; KMO = .83; loading .53 to .91; communalities ranging from .31 to .86; explained variance of 63.5%; goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = .99; adjusted GFI (AGFI) = .97; RMSR = .03), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (X/df = 4.9; GFI = .97; comparative fit index (CFI) = .92; TLI = .90; Root-Mean-Square Error of Aproximation (RMSEA) = .03). We concluded that, in a Brazilian sample, the MCTB has good construct validity for motor coordination tests with balls; this helps qualify this test for use in schools and in the sports context.

摘要

我们开展这项研究的目的是分析球类运动协调测试（MCTB）的结构效度证据。我们的参与者样本包括1620名年龄在10至12岁之间的学生（741名女生；879名男生）。使用探索性因素分析（EFA）和适配指标对四项任务的结构效度进行的证据分析证实，最终的二维模型拟合良好（BTS = .000；KMO = .83；载荷从.53至.91；共同度范围为.31至.86；解释方差为63.5%；拟合优度指数（GFI） = .99；调整后的GFI（AGFI） = .97；均方根残差（RMSR） = .03），以及验证性因素分析（CFA）（X/df = 4.9；GFI = .97；比较拟合指数（CFI） = .92；TLI = .90；近似均方根误差（RMSEA） = .03）。我们得出结论，在巴西样本中，MCTB在球类运动协调测试方面具有良好的结构效度；这有助于该测试在学校和体育环境中得到应用。