• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Internet access is a necessity: a latent class analysis of COVID-19 related challenges and the role of technology use among rural community residents.互联网接入是一种必要条件:对农村社区居民的 COVID-19 相关挑战和技术使用作用的潜在类别分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 27;22(1):845. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13254-1.
2
Disparities in Technology and Broadband Internet Access Across Rurality: Implications for Health and Education.城乡间技术和宽带互联网接入的差距:对健康和教育的影响。
Fam Community Health. 2021;44(4):257-265. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000306.
3
"We want our freedom back, that's our only need": a qualitative study of health and social needs among asylum seekers and undocumented migrants crossing the borders from Belarus to Lithuania.“我们想要回我们的自由,这是我们唯一的需求”:一项关于从白俄罗斯越境到立陶宛的寻求庇护者和无证移民的健康和社会需求的定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 2;12:1371119. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1371119. eCollection 2024.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on community-based brain injury associations across Canada: a cross-sectional survey study.新冠疫情对加拿大社区脑损伤协会的影响:一项横断面调查研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 8;11:1166106. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1166106. eCollection 2023.
6
Socio-economic inequalities in the breadth of internet use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among older adults in England.英格兰老年人在新冠疫情前后互联网使用广度方面的社会经济不平等。
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0303061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303061. eCollection 2024.
7
The COVID-19 pandemic's intersectional impact on work life, home life and wellbeing: an exploratory mixed-methods analysis of Georgia women's experiences during the pandemic.COVID-19 大流行对工作生活、家庭生活和健康的交叉影响:对大流行期间佐治亚州女性经历的探索性混合方法分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;22(1):1988. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14285-4.
8
The Unique Impact of COVID-19 on Older Adults in Rural Areas.农村地区老年人受 COVID-19 影响的独特性。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jul-Oct;32(4-5):396-402. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1770036. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
9
COVID-19 and pandemic planning in the context of rural and remote homelessness.农村和偏远地区无家可归者背景下的 COVID-19 和大流行规划。
Can J Public Health. 2020 Dec;111(6):967-970. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00415-1. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
10
The Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic Policy on Social Needs Across the State of Kansas and Western Missouri: Paired Survey Response Testing.新冠疫情政策对堪萨斯州和密苏里州西部地区社会需求的影响:配对调查响应测试。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Apr 25;9:e41369. doi: 10.2196/41369.

引用本文的文献

1
Qualitative Interview with Older Adults and Caregivers on their Perspectives with Self-Management and Remote Vital Sign Monitoring.对老年人和照顾者关于自我管理及远程生命体征监测观点的定性访谈
Can Geriatr J. 2025 Sep 3;28(3):257-263. doi: 10.5770/cgj.28.833. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Right out of the gate: a mixed method study on the needs and priorities of individuals with or at risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema.一开始:一项关于乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿患者或有患该病风险的个体的需求和优先事项的混合方法研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01800-w.
3
The impact of digital skills on health: Evidence from the China General Social Survey.数字技能对健康的影响:来自中国综合社会调查的证据。
Digit Health. 2024 Dec 5;10:20552076241304592. doi: 10.1177/20552076241304592. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Editorial: Post-pandemic digital realities of older adults.社论:疫情后老年人的数字现实
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 28;14:1275257. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1275257. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in Digital Communication During the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: Implications for Digital Inequality and Future Research.新冠疫情全球大流行期间数字通信的变化:对数字不平等及未来研究的影响
Soc Media Soc. 2020 Sep 9;6(3):2056305120948255. doi: 10.1177/2056305120948255. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
Investigating the effect of national government physical distancing measures on depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic through meta-analysis and meta-regression.通过荟萃分析和荟萃回归研究国家政府实施的身体疏远措施对 COVID-19 大流行期间抑郁和焦虑的影响。
Psychol Med. 2021 Apr;51(6):881-893. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721000933. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
3
Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on rural America.新冠疫情对美国农村的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 5;118(1). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2019378118.
4
Contributing factors to personal protective equipment shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic.导致个人防护设备短缺的因素在 COVID-19 大流行期间。
Prev Med. 2020 Dec;141:106263. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106263. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
5
The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence.新冠疫情期间远程医疗的作用:基于现有证据的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 1;20(1):1193. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09301-4.
6
Global shortage of personal protective equipment.全球个人防护装备短缺。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):785-786. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30501-6.
7
Telehealth in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for rural health disparities.远程医疗应对 COVID-19 大流行:对农村健康差距的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Nov 1;27(11):1816-1818. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa156.
8
The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities.新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行与卫生不平等。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Nov;74(11):964-968. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214401. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
9
COVID-19 and Health Disparities: the Reality of "the Great Equalizer".新冠疫情与健康差异:“伟大平等izer”的现实。 (注:这里原文中“Equalizer”可能有误,推测可能是“Equalizer”想表达“equalizer”即“均衡器、平等化因素”等意思,结合语境这里大概想表达新冠疫情本应是消除健康差异的平等化因素,但实际却出现了问题展现出了健康差异等意思,不过按要求严格翻译就是上述译文。)
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):2439-2440. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05880-5. Epub 2020 May 14.
10
Unequal Distribution of COVID-19 Risk Among Rural Residents by Race and Ethnicity.农村居民中COVID-19风险按种族和族裔的不平等分布。
J Rural Health. 2021 Jan;37(1):224-226. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12463. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

互联网接入是一种必要条件:对农村社区居民的 COVID-19 相关挑战和技术使用作用的潜在类别分析。

Internet access is a necessity: a latent class analysis of COVID-19 related challenges and the role of technology use among rural community residents.

机构信息

School of Social Work and Centre for the Study of Services to Children and Families, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.

School of Nursing, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 27;22(1):845. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13254-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-13254-1
PMID:35477433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9045795/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rural and remote communities faced unique access challenges to essential services such as healthcare and highspeed infrastructure pre-COVID, which have been amplified by the pandemic. This study examined patterns of COVID-related challenges and the use of technology among rural-living individuals during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

A sample of 279 rural residents completed an online survey about the impact of COVID-related challenges and the role of technology use. Latent class analysis was used to generate subgroups reflecting the patterns of COVID-related challenges. Differences in group membership were examined based on age, gender, education, race/ethnicity, and living situation. Finally, thematic analysis of open-ended qualitative responses was conducted to further contextualize the challenges experienced by rural-living residents.

RESULTS

Four distinct COVID challenge impact subgroups were identified: 1) Social challenges (35%), 2) Social and Health challenges (31%), 3) Social and Financial challenges (14%), and 4) Social, Health, Financial, and Daily Living challenges (19%). Older adults were more likely to be in the Social challenges or Social and Health challenges groups as compared to young adults who were more likely to be in the Social, Health, Financial, and Daily Living challenges group. Additionally, although participants were using technology more frequently during the COVID-19 pandemic to address challenges, they were also reporting issues with quality and connectivity as a significant barrier.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses found four different patterns of impact related to social, health, financial, and daily living challenges in the context of COVID. Social needs were evident across the four groups; however, we also found nearly 1 in 5 rural-living individuals were impacted by an array of challenges. Access to reliable internet and devices has the potential to support individuals to manage these challenges.

摘要

背景

在 COVID 之前,农村和偏远社区在获得医疗保健和高速基础设施等基本服务方面面临着独特的挑战,而这些挑战在大流行期间进一步加剧。本研究调查了 COVID 相关挑战的模式以及农村居民在 COVID-19 大流行的第一波期间使用技术的情况。

方法

对 279 名农村居民进行了一项在线调查,内容涉及 COVID 相关挑战的影响以及技术使用情况。采用潜在类别分析生成反映 COVID 相关挑战模式的亚组。根据年龄、性别、教育程度、种族/民族和居住情况,检查群体成员差异。最后,对开放式定性回复进行主题分析,以进一步了解农村居民所面临的挑战。

结果

确定了四个不同的 COVID 挑战影响亚组:1)社会挑战(35%),2)社会和健康挑战(31%),3)社会和财务挑战(14%),4)社会、健康、财务和日常生活挑战(19%)。与年轻人相比,老年人更有可能处于社会挑战或社会和健康挑战组中,而年轻人更有可能处于社会、健康、财务和日常生活挑战组中。此外,尽管参与者在 COVID-19 大流行期间更频繁地使用技术来应对挑战,但他们也报告说,由于质量和连接性问题,这是一个重大障碍。

结论

这些分析发现了与 COVID 背景下的社会、健康、财务和日常生活挑战相关的四种不同影响模式。四个组都存在社会需求;然而,我们还发现近五分之一的农村居民受到一系列挑战的影响。可靠的互联网和设备的接入有可能支持个人应对这些挑战。