Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093
Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System/University of California San Diego, San Diego, California 92161.
J Neurosci. 2022 Jun 1;42(22):4517-4537. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1786-21.2022. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
In humans, sleep spindles are 10- to 16-Hz oscillations lasting approximately 0.5-2 s. Spindles, along with cortical slow oscillations, may facilitate memory consolidation by enabling synaptic plasticity. Early recordings of spindles at the scalp found anterior channels had overall slower frequency than central-posterior channels. This robust, topographical finding led to dichotomizing spindles as "slow" versus "fast," modeled as two distinct spindle generators in frontal versus posterior cortex. Using a large dataset of intracranial stereoelectroencephalographic (sEEG) recordings from 20 patients (13 female, 7 male) and 365 bipolar recordings, we show that the difference in spindle frequency between frontal and parietal channels is comparable to the variability in spindle frequency within the course of individual spindles, across different spindles recorded by a given site, and across sites within a given region. Thus, fast and slow spindles only capture average differences that obscure a much larger underlying overlap in frequency. Furthermore, differences in mean frequency are only one of several ways that spindles differ. For example, compared with parietal, frontal spindles are smaller, tend to occur after parietal when both are engaged, and show a larger decrease in frequency within-spindles. However, frontal and parietal spindles are similar in being longer, less variable, and more widespread than occipital, temporal, and Rolandic spindles. These characteristics are accentuated in spindles which are highly phase-locked to posterior hippocampal spindles. We propose that rather than a strict parietal-fast/frontal-slow dichotomy, spindles differ continuously and quasi-independently in multiple dimensions, with variability due about equally to within-spindle, within-region, and between-region factors. Sleep spindles are 10- to 16-Hz neural oscillations generated by cortico-thalamic circuits that promote memory consolidation. Spindles are often dichotomized into slow-anterior and fast-posterior categories for cognitive and clinical studies. Here, we show that the anterior-posterior difference in spindle frequency is comparable to that observed between different cycles of individual spindles, between spindles from a given site, or from different sites within a region. Further, we show that spindles vary on other dimensions such as duration, amplitude, spread, primacy and consistency, and that these multiple dimensions vary continuously and largely independently across cortical regions. These findings suggest that multiple continuous variables rather than a strict frequency dichotomy may be more useful biomarkers for memory consolidation or psychiatric disorders.
在人类中,睡眠纺锤波是 10-16Hz 的震荡,持续约 0.5-2 秒。纺锤波与皮质慢波震荡一起,通过使突触可塑性,可能促进记忆巩固。头皮上早期的纺锤波记录发现,前导通道的整体频率比中后部通道慢。这一强大的、地形学上的发现导致将纺锤波分为“慢”和“快”,将其建模为额叶皮质和后部皮质中的两个不同的纺锤波发生器。使用来自 20 名患者(13 名女性,7 名男性)和 365 个双极记录的颅内立体脑电图(sEEG)记录的大型数据集,我们表明,额叶和顶叶通道之间的纺锤波频率差异与单个纺锤波过程中纺锤波频率的可变性、给定部位记录的不同纺锤波以及给定区域内的部位相似。因此,快和慢纺锤波仅捕获了平均差异,而掩盖了频率上更大的潜在重叠。此外,频率差异只是纺锤波差异的几种方式之一。例如,与顶叶相比,额叶纺锤波较小,当两者都被激活时,往往在顶叶之后发生,并且在纺锤波内频率下降较大。然而,额叶和顶叶纺锤波与枕叶、颞叶和 Rolandic 纺锤波相比,具有更长、更稳定和更广泛的特点。当与后海马的纺锤波高度锁相时,这些特征更加突出。我们提出,纺锤波不是严格的顶叶-快/额叶-慢二分法,而是在多个维度上连续且准独立地变化,其变异性大约同样归因于纺锤波内、区域内和区域间因素。睡眠纺锤波是由皮质丘脑回路产生的 10-16Hz 神经震荡,促进记忆巩固。纺锤波通常分为慢前和快后两类,用于认知和临床研究。在这里,我们表明,纺锤波频率的前后差异与单个纺锤波的不同周期之间、来自给定部位的纺锤波之间或来自区域内不同部位的纺锤波之间观察到的差异相当。此外,我们表明,纺锤波在其他维度上也存在差异,例如持续时间、幅度、传播、优先性和一致性,并且这些多个维度在皮质区域之间连续且在很大程度上独立变化。这些发现表明,多个连续变量而不是严格的频率二分法可能是记忆巩固或精神障碍的更有用的生物标志物。