Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Therapies, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
J Trauma Stress. 2022 Oct;35(5):1405-1419. doi: 10.1002/jts.22840. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
Previous research suggests that the effect of therapist factors on patient outcomes is significant. Yet, to date, no reviews have explored the potential effects of therapist characteristics on treatment outcomes for children and youth with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the professional characteristics of trial therapists delivering trauma-focused cognitive behavioral interventions (TF-CBT) for child PTSD in clinical trials and understand the association between treatment efficacy and therapist factors. Systematic searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through November 3, 2020, were conducted; 40 RCTs were included in the full review. PTSD treatment outcome data were extracted from each publication along with any available data regarding trial therapists. Subgroup analyses were conducted to compare the outcomes of interventions conducted by different types of therapists. All therapist groups yielded significant effects for TF-CBT relative to active and passive control conditions, with the largest effect size, Hedges' g = -1.11, for RCTs that used clinical psychologists and psychiatrists. A significant moderating effect was found when comparing the treatment outcomes of clinical psychologists and psychiatrists versus other professionals, p = .044; however, this effect was no longer apparent when only studies with an active control arm were included. Further moderator analyses demonstrated no significant differences regarding therapists' educational and professional backgrounds and PTSD treatment outcomes. The current RCT evidence for TF-CBT for children and youth with PTSD does not suggest that therapist educational or professional background influences treatment efficacy. Limitations and implications for future research are discussed.
先前的研究表明,治疗师因素对患者结果的影响是显著的。然而,迄今为止,尚无综述探讨治疗师特征对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)儿童和青少年治疗结果的潜在影响。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在总结临床试验中为 PTSD 儿童提供创伤聚焦认知行为干预(TF-CBT)的试验治疗师的专业特征,并了解治疗效果与治疗师因素之间的关系。系统检索了截至 2020 年 11 月 3 日发表的随机对照试验(RCT),共纳入 40 项 RCT。从每项出版物中提取 PTSD 治疗结果数据以及任何关于试验治疗师的可用数据。进行了亚组分析,以比较不同类型治疗师进行的干预措施的结果。所有治疗师组相对于活跃和被动对照组,对 TF-CBT 均产生显著效果,使用临床心理学家和精神科医生的 RCT 效果最大,Hedges'g=-1.11。当比较临床心理学家和精神科医生与其他专业人员的治疗结果时,发现有显著的调节作用,p=0.044;然而,当仅纳入有活跃对照组的研究时,这种效果不再明显。进一步的调节分析表明,治疗师的教育和专业背景与 PTSD 治疗结果之间没有显著差异。目前针对 PTSD 儿童和青少年的 TF-CBT 的 RCT 证据表明,治疗师的教育或专业背景并不影响治疗效果。讨论了研究的局限性和对未来研究的意义。