• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用旅程地图法来了解患者在使用药房咨询服务选择医疗保险D部分计划时的体验。

Using journey mapping to understand the patient experience with selecting a Medicare part D plan using a pharmacy consultation service.

作者信息

Murry Logan T, Al-Khatib Arwa, Witry Matthew J

机构信息

The University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Health Services Research, 180 S Grand Avenue, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States of America.

出版信息

Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2021 Mar 31;1:100006. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100006. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100006
PMID:35479501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9030676/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient experience with community pharmacy services can be informed by human-centered design principles and approaches. Pharmacy services may benefit from detailed evaluations of consumer experience and patient-centered service design.

OBJECTIVES

To use an online journey mapping platform to understand the patient experience with selecting a Medicare Part D plan for individuals that did, and did not, use a free, pharmacy-led, Medicare Part D consultation service.

METHODS

This was a two-group cross-sectional survey study in a single, rural community pharmacy. Surveys consisted of 7 demographic items, 30 Likert-type items, and 7 open-ended response items. The pharmacy used purposeful convenience sampling to distribute a paper survey to individuals 65 years of age and older currently enrolled in Medicare Part D between June and August 2019. Surveys were distributed to 36 patients currently enrolled in a Medicare Part D plan, with 18 surveys distributed to patients who had previously used a pharmacy-led Medicare Part D consultation service and 18 surveys distributed to patients who did not use the service. Surveys were uploaded to an online journey mapping platform, producing data visualizations for each group. Multiple choice survey items were analyzed using descriptive statistics, wth service user and nonuser groups compared using Mann-Whitney tests. Open-ended survey responses were coded by the research team using an inductive approach.

RESULTS

In total, 36 surveys were returned to the community pharmacy for a response rate of 100%. The journey map platform generated , , and outputs, which mapped and within the Medicare Part D plan selection experience. differed in their median household incomes ($25,000-$39,999 for service users compared to $50,000-$74,999 for nonusers). and outputs showed that service users had a wider variety of emotions compared to non-users. Mann-Whitney tests yielded 5 items with statistically significant differences (-values <0.05) in the plan-selection experience, with both groups similarly uncertain about their plan decision. Qualitative responses indicate patient trust was universally important to a complex decision-making process.

CONCLUSIONS

An online journey mapping platform provided insight into how patients experience a pharmacy service that extends beyond satisfaction. For community pharmacies providing Medicare Part D plan consultation services, pharmacies should consider how they can improve the service experience through communication style and patient-centered service design.

摘要

背景

以用户为中心的设计原则和方法可为患者的社区药房服务体验提供参考。药房服务可能会受益于对消费者体验和以患者为中心的服务设计的详细评估。

目的

使用在线旅程映射平台,了解使用和未使用由药房主导的免费医疗保险D部分咨询服务的个人在选择医疗保险D部分计划时的患者体验。

方法

这是一项在一个农村社区药房进行的两组横断面调查研究。调查问卷包括7个人口统计学项目、30个李克特式项目和7个开放式回答项目。该药房采用目的便利抽样法,于2019年6月至8月向目前参加医疗保险D部分的65岁及以上个人发放纸质调查问卷。共向36名目前参加医疗保险D部分计划的患者发放了调查问卷,其中18份问卷发放给了之前使用过药房主导的医疗保险D部分咨询服务的患者,另外18份问卷发放给了未使用该服务的患者。调查问卷被上传到一个在线旅程映射平台,为每个组生成数据可视化。使用描述性统计分析多项选择调查项目,使用曼-惠特尼检验比较服务使用者和非使用者组。研究团队采用归纳法对开放式调查回答进行编码。

结果

总共36份调查问卷被返还给社区药房,回复率为100%。旅程映射平台生成了、和输出,描绘了医疗保险D部分计划选择体验中的和。两组的家庭收入中位数有所不同(服务使用者为25,000美元至39,999美元,非使用者为50,000美元至74,999美元)。和输出显示,与非使用者相比,服务使用者有更广泛的情绪。曼-惠特尼检验在计划选择体验中产生了5个具有统计学显著差异(-值<0.05)的项目,两组对其计划决策同样不确定。定性回答表明,患者信任在复杂的决策过程中普遍很重要。

结论

一个在线旅程映射平台提供了关于患者如何体验超出满意度的药房服务的见解。对于提供医疗保险D部分计划咨询服务的社区药房,药房应考虑如何通过沟通方式和以患者为中心的服务设计来改善服务体验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a35/9030676/8fdb4ca0192c/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a35/9030676/95489b333fa7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a35/9030676/065652c9d309/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a35/9030676/f187eb705b13/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a35/9030676/14c0d403e5bb/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a35/9030676/ef923ded4450/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a35/9030676/8fdb4ca0192c/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a35/9030676/95489b333fa7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a35/9030676/065652c9d309/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a35/9030676/f187eb705b13/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a35/9030676/14c0d403e5bb/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a35/9030676/ef923ded4450/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a35/9030676/8fdb4ca0192c/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
Using journey mapping to understand the patient experience with selecting a Medicare part D plan using a pharmacy consultation service.运用旅程地图法来了解患者在使用药房咨询服务选择医疗保险D部分计划时的体验。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2021 Mar 31;1:100006. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100006. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Cost-Savings and Patient Experience with a Pharmacy-Led Medicare Part D Consultation Service.由药房主导的医疗保险D部分咨询服务的成本节约与患者体验
Innov Pharm. 2020 Apr 30;11(2). doi: 10.24926/iip.v11i2.3191. eCollection 2020.
3
Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for community pharmacy-led Medicare Part D consultation services: A discrete choice experiment.患者对社区药房主导的医疗保险D部分咨询服务的偏好和支付意愿:一项离散选择实验。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 May;19(5):764-772. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
4
A qualitative exploration of patient preferences for Medicare Part D consultation services offered in a community pharmacy setting.在社区药店环境中提供的医疗保险处方药咨询服务的患者偏好的定性探索。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2023 Jan-Feb;63(1):97-107.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.08.020. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
5
Community Pharmacy Medicare Part D Consultations: Plan-Switching Decisions and Chronic Medication Adherence.社区药房医疗保险部分 D 咨询:计划转换决策和慢性药物依从性。
J Pharm Pract. 2021 Oct;34(5):727-733. doi: 10.1177/0897190020903852. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
6
Medicare Part D plan-selection experience: qualitative findings from a national cross-sectional survey.医疗保险D部分的计划选择体验:一项全国性横断面调查的定性研究结果
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Jan 3;9:100219. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100219. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Impact of an open enrollment service on costs for Medicare Part D beneficiaries.开放注册服务对医疗保险D部分受益人的成本影响。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 May-Jun;57(3S):S225-S228. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
8
Understanding the impact of a new pharmacy sore throat test and treat service on patient experience: A survey study.了解新的药店咽喉痛检测和治疗服务对患者体验的影响:一项调查研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 May;17(5):969-977. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.034. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
9
Journey Mapping Healthcare Worker Experience With Heart Rhythm Meditation.通过心律冥想绘制医护人员体验之旅
Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2023 Jan 16;12:2164957X231152796. doi: 10.1177/2164957X231152796. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
10
Research methods from human-centered design: Potential applications in pharmacy and health services research.以人为中心的设计研究方法:在药学和卫生服务研究中的潜在应用。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Dec;17(12):2036-2043. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumer perceptions and preferences of pharmacist-led professional services and attributes in Australia: a qualitative focus group study.澳大利亚消费者对药剂师主导的专业服务及其属性的认知与偏好:一项定性焦点小组研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 18;15(6):e101049. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101049.
2
Barriers to person-centered service design in pharmacy practice: examples, lessons, and potential solutions.药学实践中以患者为中心的服务设计障碍:实例、经验教训和潜在解决方案。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Apr;46(2):542-547. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01689-4. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
3
Beyond satisfaction in person-centered pharmacy services.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-Savings and Patient Experience with a Pharmacy-Led Medicare Part D Consultation Service.由药房主导的医疗保险D部分咨询服务的成本节约与患者体验
Innov Pharm. 2020 Apr 30;11(2). doi: 10.24926/iip.v11i2.3191. eCollection 2020.
2
Implementation of a pharmacist-delivered Medicare counseling service in a rural community health center.在农村社区卫生中心实施药剂师提供的医疗保险咨询服务。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Jul-Aug;60(4):e79-e85. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
3
"You're Always Jumping Through Hoops": Journey Mapping the Care Experiences of Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder-associated Endocarditis.
超越以患者为中心的药学服务中的满意度。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Oct 30;12:100355. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100355. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Medicare Part D plan-selection experience: qualitative findings from a national cross-sectional survey.医疗保险D部分的计划选择体验:一项全国性横断面调查的定性研究结果
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Jan 3;9:100219. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100219. eCollection 2023 Mar.
“总是要历经重重难关”:绘制患有阿片类药物使用障碍相关性心内膜炎个体的护理体验路径图。
J Addict Med. 2020 Dec;14(6):494-501. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000648.
4
Establishing trustworthiness and authenticity in qualitative pharmacy research.在定性药学研究中建立可信度和真实性。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Oct;16(10):1472-1482. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
5
Community Pharmacy Medicare Part D Consultations: Plan-Switching Decisions and Chronic Medication Adherence.社区药房医疗保险部分 D 咨询:计划转换决策和慢性药物依从性。
J Pharm Pract. 2021 Oct;34(5):727-733. doi: 10.1177/0897190020903852. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
6
Creation of a Patient-Centered Journey Map to Improve the Patient Experience: A Mixed Methods Approach.创建以患者为中心的旅程地图以改善患者体验:一种混合方法。
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2019 Sep 24;3(4):466-475. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.07.004. eCollection 2019 Dec.
7
A qualitative review of the design thinking framework in health professions education.健康职业教育设计思维框架的定性评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Apr 4;19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1528-8.
8
Association Between Health Insurance Literacy and Avoidance of Health Care Services Owing to Cost.健康保险素养与因费用而避免医疗服务之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184796. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4796.
9
Design Thinking in Health Care.医疗保健中的设计思维。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Sep 27;15:E117. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.180128.
10
Medicare Part D Beneficiaries' Plan Switching Decisions and Information Processing.医疗保险D部分受益人的计划转换决策与信息处理
Med Care Res Rev. 2018 Dec;75(6):721-745. doi: 10.1177/1077558717692883. Epub 2017 Mar 1.