• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测急诊重症监护病房患者谵妄的列线图模型:一项回顾性队列研究

Nomogram Models for Predicting Delirium of Patients in Emergency Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Shi Yu, Wang Hai, Zhang Li, Zhang Ming, Shi Xiaoyan, Pei Honghong, Bai Zhenghai

机构信息

Emergency Department & EICU, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan Xi, 710004, Peoples' Republic of China.

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi 'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan Xi, 710061, Peoples' Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Gen Med. 2022 Apr 21;15:4259-4272. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S353318. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S353318
PMID:35480993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9037921/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intensive care unit (ICU) delirium is one of the most common clinical syndromes that results in many adverse events that affect patients, families, and hospitals. To date, there has been no tool for effectively predicting the occurrence of delirium in emergency intensive care unit (EICU) patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study and constructed a prediction model for 319 patients in EICU, who met our inclusion criteria. We analyzed the relationship between patients' clinical data within 24 hours of admission and delirium, applied univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to select the most relevant variables for construction of nomogram models, then applied bootstrapping for internal validation.

RESULTS

A total of five variables, namely stomach and urinary tubes, as well as sedative, mechanical ventilation and APACHE-II scores, were selected for model construction. We generated a total of five sets of models (three sets of construction models and two sets of internal verification models), with similar predictive value. The optimal model was selected, and together with the 5 variables used to construct a nomogram. The AUC of the MFP model in all patients was 0.76 (0.70, 0.82), whereas that in non-elderly patients (<60 years old) for the full model was 0.83 (0.74, 0.91). In elderly patients (≥60 years old), the AUC of the MFP model was 0.82 (0.73, 0.91).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the five-marker-based prognostic tool, established herein, can effectively predict the occurrence of delirium in EICU patients.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房(ICU)谵妄是最常见的临床综合征之一,会导致许多影响患者、家庭和医院的不良事件。迄今为止,尚无有效预测急诊重症监护病房(EICU)患者谵妄发生的工具。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,为319例符合纳入标准的EICU患者构建了预测模型。我们分析了患者入院24小时内的临床数据与谵妄之间的关系,应用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析选择构建列线图模型最相关的变量,然后应用自抽样法进行内部验证。

结果

共选择了五个变量用于模型构建,即胃管和尿管以及镇静剂、机械通气和急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE-II)评分。我们总共生成了五组模型(三组构建模型和两组内部验证模型),预测价值相似。选择了最优模型,并结合用于构建列线图的5个变量。所有患者中MFP模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.76(0.70,0.82),而全模型在非老年患者(<60岁)中的AUC为0.83(0.74,0.91)。在老年患者(≥60岁)中,MFP模型的AUC为0.82(0.73,0.91)。

结论

总体而言,本文建立的基于五个标志物的预后工具可有效预测EICU患者谵妄的发生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/e2474cdd83f2/IJGM-15-4259-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/8c5a77a40030/IJGM-15-4259-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/a0a3838006e8/IJGM-15-4259-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/b3fa235f8303/IJGM-15-4259-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/de75965136d6/IJGM-15-4259-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/6df953359546/IJGM-15-4259-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/48857abc2f60/IJGM-15-4259-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/5b5780b51cd6/IJGM-15-4259-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/4b4be18b913c/IJGM-15-4259-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/4f24b1958813/IJGM-15-4259-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/e2474cdd83f2/IJGM-15-4259-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/8c5a77a40030/IJGM-15-4259-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/a0a3838006e8/IJGM-15-4259-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/b3fa235f8303/IJGM-15-4259-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/de75965136d6/IJGM-15-4259-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/6df953359546/IJGM-15-4259-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/48857abc2f60/IJGM-15-4259-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/5b5780b51cd6/IJGM-15-4259-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/4b4be18b913c/IJGM-15-4259-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/4f24b1958813/IJGM-15-4259-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d7/9037921/e2474cdd83f2/IJGM-15-4259-g0010.jpg

相似文献

1
Nomogram Models for Predicting Delirium of Patients in Emergency Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study.预测急诊重症监护病房患者谵妄的列线图模型:一项回顾性队列研究
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Apr 21;15:4259-4272. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S353318. eCollection 2022.
2
A Nomogram for Predicting Hospital Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.用于预测急性心肌梗死重症监护病房患者医院死亡率的列线图。
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Sep 18;14:5863-5877. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S326898. eCollection 2021.
3
Development and validation of delirium prediction model for critically ill adults parameterized to ICU admission acuity.开发和验证针对 ICU 入院严重程度参数化的危重症成人谵妄预测模型。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 19;15(8):e0237639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237639. eCollection 2020.
4
[Risk factors for death in elderly patients admitted to intensive care unit after elective abdominal surgery: a consecutive 5-year retrospective study].择期腹部手术后入住重症监护病房老年患者的死亡危险因素:一项连续5年的回顾性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Dec;33(12):1453-1458. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210804-00118.
5
[Optimal pain control goal for preventing delirium in critical patients].[预防重症患者谵妄的最佳疼痛控制目标]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Jan;33(1):84-88. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200828-00600.
6
Development and validation of PRE-DELIRIC (PREdiction of DELIRium in ICu patients) delirium prediction model for intensive care patients: observational multicentre study.开发和验证 PRE-DELIRIC(ICU 患者谵妄预测)谵妄预测模型:观察性多中心研究。
BMJ. 2012 Feb 9;344:e420. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e420.
7
[Establishment and validation of a risk prediction model for intensive care unit-acquired weakness].[重症监护病房获得性肌无力风险预测模型的建立与验证]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Dec;33(12):1491-1496. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210513-00707.
8
The impact of delirium on the prediction of in-hospital mortality in intensive care patients.谵妄对重症监护患者住院死亡率预测的影响。
Crit Care. 2010;14(4):R146. doi: 10.1186/cc9214. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
9
[A new warning scoring system establishment for prediction of sepsis in patients with trauma in intensive care unit].[一种用于预测重症监护病房创伤患者脓毒症的新预警评分系统的建立]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Apr;31(4):422-427. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.04.010.
10
[Correlation between APACHE II scores and delirium probability of senile severe pneumonia patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation].[老年重症肺炎有创机械通气患者急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHE II)评分与谵妄发生概率的相关性]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Sep;29(9):821-824. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.09.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Determining the ground truth for the prediction of delirium in adult patients in acute care: a scoping review.确定急性护理中成年患者谵妄预测的真实情况:一项范围综述
JAMIA Open. 2025 May 26;8(3):ooaf037. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf037. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Machine learning for prediction of delirium in patients with extensive burns after surgery.机器学习预测手术后广泛烧伤患者的谵妄。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2023 Oct;29(10):2986-2997. doi: 10.1111/cns.14237. Epub 2023 Apr 30.

本文引用的文献

1
[Research progress of delirium in intensive care unit].[重症监护病房谵妄的研究进展]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 May;32(5):636-640. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200204-00164.
2
Development a clinical prediction model of the neurological outcome for patients with coma and survived 24 hours after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.制定心肺复苏后 24 小时仍处于昏迷状态的患者神经预后的临床预测模型。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Sep;43(9):1024-1031. doi: 10.1002/clc.23403. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
3
Delirium in Developmentally Disabled PICU Children: The Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale and Delirium Fluctuation Issue.
发育障碍的儿科重症监护病房儿童的谵妄:里士满躁动镇静量表与谵妄波动问题
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 May;21(5):494-495. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002250.
4
A Retrospective Population Study to Develop a Predictive Model of Prediabetes and Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus from a Hospital Database in Japan Between 2004 and 2015.一项回顾性人群研究,旨在从 2004 年至 2015 年日本某医院数据库中建立预测糖尿病前期和 2 型糖尿病发病的模型。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Apr 1;26:e920880. doi: 10.12659/MSM.920880.
5
Assessment of delirium using the PRE-DELIRIC model in an intensive care unit in Argentina.在阿根廷一家重症监护病房中使用PRE-DELIRIC模型评估谵妄。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018 Mar;30(1):50-56. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20180010.
6
Preventing Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit.
JAMA. 2018 Feb 20;319(7):659-660. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0159.
7
Risk Factors of Delirium in Sequential Sedation Patients in Intensive Care Units.序贯镇静 ICU 患者谵妄的危险因素。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3539872. doi: 10.1155/2017/3539872. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
8
Delirium and effect of circadian light in the intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study.重症监护病房中的谵妄与昼夜节律光照的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Mar;62(3):367-375. doi: 10.1111/aas.13037. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
9
Incidence and risk factors for delirium development in ICU patients - a prospective observational study.重症监护病房患者谵妄发生的发生率及危险因素——一项前瞻性观察性研究
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2017 Jun;161(2):187-196. doi: 10.5507/bp.2017.004. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
10
Importance of the use of protocols for the management of analgesia and sedation in pediatric intensive care unit.儿科重症监护病房中使用镇痛和镇静管理方案的重要性。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2016 Sep;62(6):602-609. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.62.06.602.