• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小规模觅食社会中的大规模合作。

Large-scale cooperation in small-scale foraging societies.

机构信息

Institute for Human Origins, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.

Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, California, USA.

出版信息

Evol Anthropol. 2022 Jul;31(4):175-198. doi: 10.1002/evan.21944. Epub 2022 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1002/evan.21944
PMID:35485603
Abstract

We present evidence that people in small-scale mobile hunter-gatherer societies cooperated in large numbers to produce collective goods. Foragers engaged in large-scale communal hunts and constructed shared capital facilities; they made shared investments in improving the local environment; and they participated in warfare, formed enduring alliances, and established trading networks. Large-scale collective action often played a crucial role in subsistence. The provision of public goods involved the cooperation of many individuals, so each person made only a small contribution. This evidence suggests that large-scale cooperation occurred in the Pleistocene societies that encompass most of human evolutionary history, and therefore it is unlikely that large-scale cooperation in Holocene food producing societies results from an evolved psychology shaped only in small-group interactions. Instead, large-scale human cooperation needs to be explained as an adaptation, likely rooted in distinctive features of human biology, grammatical language, increased cognitive ability, and cumulative cultural adaptation.

摘要

我们提供的证据表明,小规模流动狩猎采集社会中的人们大量合作生产集体物品。觅食者参与大规模的公共狩猎,并建造共享的资本设施;他们共同投资改善当地环境;他们参与战争,形成持久的联盟,并建立贸易网络。大规模的集体行动在生存中经常起着至关重要的作用。公共物品的提供涉及许多个人的合作,因此每个人只做了很小的贡献。这一证据表明,在包含人类进化史大部分的更新世社会中发生了大规模合作,因此,在全新世生产食物的社会中,大规模合作不是由于仅在小群体互动中形成的进化心理,而是需要被解释为一种适应,可能根植于人类生物学、语法语言、认知能力的提高和累积文化适应的独特特征。

相似文献

1
Large-scale cooperation in small-scale foraging societies.小规模觅食社会中的大规模合作。
Evol Anthropol. 2022 Jul;31(4):175-198. doi: 10.1002/evan.21944. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
2
Variability in the organization and size of hunter-gatherer groups: Foragers do not live in small-scale societies.狩猎采集人群的组织和规模的多样性:觅食者并不生活在小规模社会中。
J Hum Evol. 2019 Jun;131:96-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
3
How small-scale societies achieve large-scale cooperation.小规模社会如何实现大规模合作。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Apr;44:44-48. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.026. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
4
Proving communal warfare among hunter-gatherers: The Quasi-Rousseauan error.证明狩猎采集者之间的群体冲突:准卢梭式错误。
Evol Anthropol. 2015 May-Jun;24(3):111-26. doi: 10.1002/evan.21446.
5
Pacifying Hunter-Gatherers.安抚狩猎采集者。
Hum Nat. 2019 Jun;30(2):155-175. doi: 10.1007/s12110-019-09340-w.
6
Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure.狩猎采集社会中的共居模式展示了独特的人类社会结构。
Science. 2011 Mar 11;331(6022):1286-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1199071.
7
How institutions shaped the last major evolutionary transition to large-scale human societies.机构是如何塑造了向大规模人类社会的上一次重大进化转变的。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150098. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0098.
8
Cooperation, collective action, and the archeology of large-scale societies.合作、集体行动与大型社会的考古学
Evol Anthropol. 2016 Nov;25(6):288-296. doi: 10.1002/evan.21506.
9
Punishment sustains large-scale cooperation in prestate warfare.惩罚在国家形成前的战争中维持大规模合作。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 12;108(28):11375-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105604108. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
10
Hunter-Gatherers Maintain Assortativity in Cooperation despite High Levels of Residential Change and Mixing.狩猎采集者在高居住变动和混合水平下保持合作的多样性。
Curr Biol. 2018 Oct 8;28(19):3152-3157.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.064. Epub 2018 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Mourning ritual participation, subjective well-being and prosocial behaviour among the Luhya people of Kenya.肯尼亚卢希亚族人的哀悼仪式参与、主观幸福感和亲社会行为
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Sep;292(2054):20250213. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.0213. Epub 2025 Sep 3.
2
Indirect genetic effects among neighbors promote cooperation and accelerate adaptation in a small-scale human society.邻居间的间接遗传效应促进了小规模人类社会中的合作并加速了适应。
Sci Adv. 2025 Aug;11(31):eads3129. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ads3129. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
3
An aspirational approach to planetary futures.
对地球未来的一种理想主义方法。
Nature. 2025 Jun;642(8069):889-899. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09080-1. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
4
Cultural evolution: Where we have been and where we are going (maybe).文化进化:我们从哪里来,又将去向何方(或许)。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Nov 26;121(48):e2322879121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322879121. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
5
A reward self-bias leads to more optimal foraging for ourselves than others.奖励自偏差导致我们比他人更能进行更优的觅食行为。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 5;14(1):26845. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69452-x.
6
Conserved autism-associated genes tune social feeding behavior in C. elegans.自闭症相关基因在秀丽隐杆线虫的社会摄食行为中起保守调控作用。
Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 28;15(1):9301. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53590-x.
7
Brain Evolution in the Times of the Pandemic and Multimedia.大流行与多媒体时代的大脑进化
Eur Neurol. 2024;87(5-6):261-272. doi: 10.1159/000541361. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
8
Dyadic inter-group cooperation in shotgun hunting activities in a Congo Basin village.刚果盆地一个村庄中散弹狩猎活动中的二元组群体间合作
Evol Hum Sci. 2024 Apr 1;6:e22. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.14. eCollection 2024.
9
The human side of biodiversity: coevolution of the human niche, palaeo-synanthropy and ecosystem complexity in the deep human past.生物多样性的人文层面:人类生态位的共同进化、远古时期的古人类共生和生态系统复杂性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 May 27;379(1902):20230021. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0021. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
10
Super-additive cooperation.超加性合作。
Nature. 2024 Feb;626(8001):1034-1041. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07077-w. Epub 2024 Feb 21.