Division of Medical Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep;57(9):1120-1130. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2063034. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
Adequate management of patient pain and discomfort during colonoscopy is crucial to obtaining a high-quality examination. We aimed to investigate the ability of endoscopists and endoscopy assistants to accurately assess patient pain in colonoscopy.
This was a single-center, cross-sectional study including patients scheduled for an outpatient colonoscopy. Procedure-related pain, as experienced by the patient, was scored on a verbal rating scale (VRS). Endoscopists and endoscopy assistants rated patient pain likewise. Cohen's kappa was used to measure the agreement between ratings and logistic regression applied to test for potential predictors associated with underestimation of moderate-severe pain.
In total, 785 patients [median age: 54 years; females: = 413] were included. Mild, moderate, and severe pain was reported in 378/785 (48%), 168/785 (22%), and 111/785 (14%) procedures respectively. Inter-rater reliability of patient pain comparing patients with endoscopists was = 0.29, < .001 and for patients with endoscopy assistants = 0.37, < .001. In the 279 patients reporting moderate/severe pain, multivariable analysis showed that male gender (OR = 1.79), normal BMI (OR = 1.71), no history of abdominal surgery (OR = 1.81), and index-colonoscopy (OR = 1.81) were factors significantly associated with a risk for underestimation of moderate/severe pain by endoscopists. Young age (OR = 2.05) was the only corresponding factor valid for endoscopy assistants.
In a colonoscopy, estimation of patient pain by endoscopists and endoscopy assistants is often inaccurate. Endoscopists need to pay specific attention to subgroups of patients, such as male gender, and normal BMI, among whom there seems to be an important risk of underestimation of moderate-severe pain.
充分管理结肠镜检查过程中患者的疼痛和不适对于获得高质量的检查至关重要。我们旨在调查内镜医师和内镜助理准确评估结肠镜检查中患者疼痛的能力。
这是一项单中心、横断面研究,纳入了计划接受门诊结肠镜检查的患者。患者在检查过程中经历的与操作相关的疼痛通过语言评分量表(VRS)进行评分。内镜医师和内镜助理同样对患者疼痛进行评分。采用 Cohen's kappa 测量评分之间的一致性,应用逻辑回归检验与中度至重度疼痛低估相关的潜在预测因素。
共纳入 785 例患者[中位年龄:54 岁;女性: = 413]。分别有 378/785(48%)、168/785(22%)和 111/785(14%)例患者报告轻度、中度和重度疼痛。患者与内镜医师比较时疼痛的观察者间可靠性为 = 0.29, < .001,患者与内镜助理比较时为 = 0.37, < .001。在 279 例报告中-重度疼痛的患者中,多变量分析显示男性(OR = 1.79)、正常 BMI(OR = 1.71)、无腹部手术史(OR = 1.81)和索引结肠镜检查(OR = 1.81)是内镜医师低估中-重度疼痛风险的显著相关因素。年轻的年龄(OR = 2.05)是对应于内镜助理的唯一相关因素。
在结肠镜检查中,内镜医师和内镜助理对患者疼痛的评估往往不准确。内镜医师需要特别关注男性、正常 BMI 等亚组患者,这些患者似乎存在中度至重度疼痛被低估的重要风险。