Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):209-217. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.035. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
This study aimed to present a case of first-trimester uterine rupture and perform a systematic review to identify common presentations, risk factors, and management strategies.
Searches were performed in PubMed, Ovid, and Scopus using a combination of key words related to "uterine rupture," "first trimester," and "early pregnancy" from database inception to September 30, 2020.
English language descriptions of uterine rupture at ≤14 weeks of gestation were included, and cases involving pregnancy termination and ectopic pregnancy were excluded.
Outcomes for the systematic review included maternal demographics, description of uterine rupture, and specifics of uterine rupture diagnosis and management. Data were extracted to custom-made reporting forms. Median values were calculated for continuous variables, and percentages were calculated for categorical variables. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case reports and case series.
Overall, 61 cases of first-trimester uterine rupture were identified, including our novel case. First-trimester uterine ruptures occurred at a median gestation of 11 weeks. Most patients (59/61 [97%]) had abdominal pain as a presenting symptom, and previous uterine surgery was prevalent (44/61 [62%]), usually low transverse cesarean delivery (32/61 [52%]). The diagnosis of uterine rupture was generally made after surgical exploration (37/61 [61%]), with rupture noted in the fundus in 26 of 61 cases (43%) and in the lower segment in 27 of 61 cases (44%). Primary repair of the defect was possible in 40 of 61 cases (66%), whereas hysterectomy was performed in 18 of 61 cases (30%). Continuing pregnancy was possible in 4 of 61 cases (7%).
Uterine rupture is an uncommon occurrence but should be considered in patients with an acute abdomen in early pregnancy, especially in women with previous uterine surgery. Surgical exploration is typically needed to confirm the diagnosis and for management. Hysterectomy is not always necessary; primary uterine repair is sufficient in more than two-thirds of the cases to achieve hemostasis. Continuing pregnancy, although uncommon, is also possible.
本研究旨在报告一例孕早期子宫破裂病例,并进行系统评价以确定常见表现、危险因素和处理策略。
在 PubMed、Ovid 和 Scopus 中使用了与“子宫破裂”、“孕早期”和“早期妊娠”相关的关键词进行了组合检索,检索时间从数据库建立到 2020 年 9 月 30 日。
纳入≤14 孕周子宫破裂的英文描述病例,排除妊娠终止和异位妊娠的病例。
系统评价的结局包括产妇人口统计学特征、子宫破裂描述以及子宫破裂诊断和处理的具体情况。将数据提取到定制的报告表中。连续变量计算中位数,分类变量计算百分比。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所病例报告和病例系列的批判性评价清单评估偏倚风险。
共发现 61 例孕早期子宫破裂,包括我们的新病例。孕早期子宫破裂的中位孕龄为 11 周。大多数患者(59/61 [97%])以腹痛为首发症状,既往子宫手术史常见(44/61 [62%]),通常为剖宫产(32/61 [52%])。子宫破裂的诊断通常在手术探查后得出(37/61 [61%]),61 例中有 26 例(43%)破裂发生在子宫底部,27 例(44%)破裂发生在下段。61 例中有 40 例(66%)可进行缺陷的一期修复,18 例(30%)行子宫切除术。61 例中有 4 例(7%)继续妊娠。
子宫破裂虽不常见,但在孕早期出现急腹症的患者中应考虑到,尤其是有既往子宫手术史的患者。手术探查通常是必要的,以明确诊断和进行处理。并非总是需要行子宫切除术;在超过三分之二的病例中,子宫一期修复足以止血。虽然罕见,但继续妊娠也是可能的。