Suppr超能文献

耻骨联合上缘至宫底高度与超声检查作为小于胎龄儿筛查方法的比较。

A comparison of symphysis-fundal height and ultrasound as screening tests for light-for-gestational age infants.

作者信息

Pearce J M, Campbell S

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Feb;94(2):100-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb02333.x.

Abstract

The clinical efficiency of serial measurement of symphysis-fundal height (SFH) for the prediction of light-for-gestational age (LGA) infants was compared with that of a single measurement of fetal abdominal circumference (AC) by ultrasound in the third trimester. To make the tests comparable the lower cut-off point of AC was altered until the specificity matched that of SFH. The sensitivity of the AC measurement (83%) was slightly better than that of the SFH measurement (76%) but this difference was not statistically significant. Each test had a false positive rate of about 60% which is comparable with clinical assessment. Screening with both tests and predicting LGA with abnormal results from either test improved the sensitivity to 93% but, as expected, decreased the specificity to 67% and the positive predictive value to 32%. If ultrasound facilities permit both tests should be used otherwise SFH measurements only could screen for LGA with ultrasound back-up for those with low SFH results.

摘要

将孕晚期连续测量耻骨联合上缘高度(SFH)预测小于胎龄儿(LGA)的临床效率与单次超声测量胎儿腹围(AC)的临床效率进行了比较。为使测试具有可比性,调整AC的下限值,直至其特异性与SFH的特异性相匹配。AC测量的敏感性(83%)略高于SFH测量的敏感性(76%),但这种差异无统计学意义。每项测试的假阳性率约为60%,与临床评估相当。两项测试联合筛查,并根据任一项测试的异常结果预测LGA,可将敏感性提高至93%,但正如预期的那样,特异性降至67%,阳性预测值降至32%。如果具备超声检查设备,两项测试均应采用,否则仅进行SFH测量也可筛查LGA,对于SFH结果较低者,可采用超声检查作为辅助手段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验