University of Nottingham Health Service, Nottingham, UK.
Measurement and Statistical Analysis, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, USA.
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Apr 29;23(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01681-3.
Only a relatively low proportion of university students seek help for anxiety and depression disorders, partly because they dislike current drug and psychological treatment options and would prefer home-based care. The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility, acceptability and cost utility of Alpha-Stim cranial electrostimulation (CES) delivered through a nurse led primary care clinic as a daily treatment for anxiety and depression symptoms by the student at home in contrast to usual primary care.
Feasibility and acceptability of a nurse led clinic offering Alpha-Stim CES in terms of the take up and completion of the six-week course of Alpha-Stim CES. Change in score on the GAD-7 and PHQ-9 as measures of anxiety and depression symptoms at baseline and at 8 weeks following a course of Alpha-Stim CES. Similar evaluation in a non-randomised control group attending a family doctor over the same period. Cost-utility analysis of the nurse led Alpha-Stim CES and family doctor pathways with participants failing to improve following further NICE Guideline clinical care (facilitated self-help and cognitive behaviour therapy).
Of 47 students (mean age 22.1, years, 79% female opting for Alpha-Stim CES at the nurse-led clinic 46 (97.9%) completed a 6-week daily course. Forty-seven (47) students comprised a comparison group receiving usual family doctor care. Both Alpha-Stim CES and usual family doctor care were associated with large effect size reductions in GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores from baseline to 8 weeks. There were no adverse effects and only one participant showed a clinically important deterioration in the Alpha-Stim group. In the cost utility analysis, Alpha-Stim CES was a cheaper option than usual family doctor care under all deterministic or probabilistic assumptions.
Nurse delivered Alpha-Stim CES may be a feasible, acceptable and cheaper way of providing greater choice and home-based care for some university students seeking help from primary care with new presentations of anxiety and depression.
只有相对较低比例的大学生寻求焦虑和抑郁障碍的帮助,部分原因是他们不喜欢当前的药物和心理治疗选择,更愿意接受家庭为基础的护理。本研究的目的是确定在初级保健诊所中由护士主导的 Alpha-Stim 颅电刺激(CES)作为一种日常治疗,对学生在家中治疗焦虑和抑郁症状的可行性、可接受性和成本效用,与常规初级保健相比。
从参加和完成为期六周的 Alpha-Stim CES 课程的角度,评估护士主导的诊所提供 Alpha-Stim CES 的可行性和可接受性。使用 GAD-7 和 PHQ-9 量表评估基线和接受 Alpha-Stim CES 课程 8 周后的焦虑和抑郁症状变化。在同一时期内,对参加家庭医生就诊的非随机对照组进行类似评估。对护士主导的 Alpha-Stim CES 和家庭医生途径进行成本效用分析,对于那些在进一步遵循 NICE 指南临床护理(促进自助和认知行为疗法)后仍未改善的参与者。
在 47 名学生(平均年龄 22.1 岁,79%女性选择在护士主导的诊所接受 Alpha-Stim CES)中,有 46 名(97.9%)完成了为期六周的日常课程。47 名学生组成了接受常规家庭医生护理的对照组。无论是接受 Alpha-Stim CES 还是常规家庭医生护理,都与 GAD-7 和 PHQ-9 评分从基线到 8 周的显著降低有关。没有不良反应,只有一名参与者在 Alpha-Stim 组中出现临床重要恶化。在成本效用分析中,在所有确定性或概率假设下,Alpha-Stim CES 比常规家庭医生护理更便宜。
由护士提供的 Alpha-Stim CES 可能是为那些有新出现的焦虑和抑郁症状并寻求初级保健帮助的大学生提供更多选择和家庭为基础的护理的一种可行、可接受和更便宜的方法。