West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, and RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (P.G.S.).
West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center and David Geffen School of Medicine and Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (I.A.C.).
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Mar 20;168(6):414-421. doi: 10.7326/M17-1970. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
Cranial electrical stimulation (CES) is increasingly popular as a treatment, yet its clinical benefit is unclear.
To review evidence about the benefits and harms of CES for adult patients with chronic painful conditions, depression, anxiety, and insomnia.
Several databases from inception to 10 October 2017 without language restrictions and references from experts, prior reviews, and manufacturers.
Randomized controlled trials of CES versus usual care or sham CES that reported pain, depression, anxiety, or sleep outcomes in any language.
Single-reviewer extraction checked by another; dual independent quality assessment; strength-of-evidence grading by the first author with subsequent group discussion.
Twenty-eight articles from 26 randomized trials met eligibility criteria. The 2 trials that compared CES with usual care were small, and neither reported a statistically significant benefit in pain or anxiety outcomes for patients with fibromyalgia or anxiety, respectively. Fourteen trials with sham or placebo controls involving patients with painful conditions, such as headache, neuromuscular pain, or musculoskeletal pain, had conflicting results. Four trials done more than 40 years ago and 1 from 2014 provided low-strength evidence of a possible modest benefit compared with sham treatments in patients with anxiety and depression. Trials in patients with insomnia (n = 2), insomnia and anxiety (n = 1), or depression (n = 3) had inconclusive or conflicting results. Low-strength evidence suggested that CES does not cause serious side effects.
Most trials had small sample sizes and short durations; all had high risk of bias due to inadequate blinding.
Evidence is insufficient that CES has clinically important effects on fibromyalgia, headache, neuromusculoskeletal pain, degenerative joint pain, depression, or insomnia; low-strength evidence suggests modest benefit in patients with anxiety and depression.
Veterans Affairs Quality Enhancement Research Initiative. (PROSPERO: CRD42016023951).
颅电刺激(CES)作为一种治疗方法越来越受欢迎,但它的临床疗效尚不清楚。
综述 CES 治疗成人慢性疼痛、抑郁、焦虑和失眠的疗效和安全性。
从建库至 2017 年 10 月 10 日,检索了多个数据库,未限制语言,并参考了专家意见、先前的综述和制造商的信息。
CES 与常规护理或假 CES 治疗的随机对照试验,报告了疼痛、抑郁、焦虑或睡眠结果,文献语言不限。
由一位研究者进行提取,另一位进行核对;由两位独立的研究者进行质量评估;由第一作者进行证据强度分级,并随后进行小组讨论。
26 项随机试验的 28 篇文章符合纳入标准。2 项 CES 与常规护理比较的试验规模较小,分别报道 CES 对纤维肌痛或焦虑患者的疼痛或焦虑结局无统计学意义上的获益。14 项有假对照或安慰剂对照的试验涉及头痛、肌肉骨骼疼痛或神经肌肉疼痛等疼痛性疾病患者,结果存在矛盾。40 多年前的 4 项试验和 2014 年的 1 项试验提供了低强度证据,表明 CES 与假治疗相比,可能对焦虑和抑郁患者有适度的益处。2 项关于失眠患者的试验、1 项关于失眠和焦虑患者的试验或 3 项关于抑郁患者的试验结果不明确或存在矛盾。低强度证据表明,CES 不会引起严重的副作用。
大多数试验样本量小,持续时间短;由于缺乏盲法,所有试验均存在高度偏倚风险。
证据不足以表明 CES 对纤维肌痛、头痛、肌肉骨骼疼痛、退行性关节痛、抑郁或失眠有临床重要影响;低强度证据表明 CES 对焦虑和抑郁患者有适度益处。
退伍军人事务部质量提高研究倡议。(PROSPERO:CRD42016023951)