Suppr超能文献

如何比较多物种养殖家庭?——对健康和生产参数对多物种养殖结果的影响分析。

How can we compare multispecies livestock rearing households? - an analysis of the impact of health and production parameters on multispecies livestock rearing outcomes.

机构信息

The School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Australia.

Faculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Vet Res. 2022 Apr 29;18(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03175-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Central Dry Zone (CDZ) of Myanmar is a critical region of livestock production. This region supports 10 million people whose livelihoods depend on small-scale, dry-land agriculture, but it is also one of the poorest regions of Myanmar. Little is known about the constraints to animal health in multi-species livestock farms in this region or the relationships between husbandry practices and measures of the success of livestock rearing such as income, and successful health management.

RESULTS

In this study, we describe associations between husbandry practices and animal health problems affecting different body systems. We also develop a biosecurity and livestock disease prevention index by taking account of different activities (i.e. treatment, vaccination, reducing disease transmission practice, sanitation) that can be compared between livestock species, estimate the income generated from livestock production, and identify factors influencing these parameters. Cross-sectional study was used to collect data on livestock production and health from cattle (N = 382), sheep, goat (N = 303) and village chicken (N = 327) farmers in 40 villages of the CDZ. Survey-design based techniques and F-statistics, ordinal, and binomial regression were used for data analysis. Our results indicate that a significant proportion of farmers' income in the CDZ comes from crop production (43.2%) and livestock production (23.1%) and the rest of the farmers' income is derived from trading, supported by other relatives and employment. Our results indicate that animal health management practices, herd/flock size, and experience of farmers contributed significantly to the presence of animal health problems, in particular related to the physical, respiratory and digestive systems. Animal health management was usually conducted in traditional ways. Among different livestock species farms, cattle farms (cattle median BDPI: 45; IQR: 35-55) practised better biosecurity than other livestock species farms (i.e. small ruminant and village chicken farms) (small ruminant and village chicken BDPI: 10; IQR: 0-20). Interestingly, the ownership groups (i.e. rearing singly or multispecies) did not show any impact on biosecurity and disease prevention index of the farms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified good practice households and these findings will be useful for designing intervention trials to improve the production and health outcomes evaluated in this study.

摘要

背景

缅甸中部干旱带(CDZ)是一个重要的畜牧业生产区。该地区有 1000 万人,他们的生计依赖于小规模的旱地农业,但这里也是缅甸最贫穷的地区之一。人们对该地区多物种家畜养殖场的动物健康限制以及养殖成功的衡量标准(如收入和成功的健康管理)之间的关系知之甚少。

结果

在这项研究中,我们描述了不同身体系统的动物健康问题与养殖方式之间的关联。我们还通过考虑不同的活动(如治疗、接种疫苗、减少疾病传播的实践、卫生)来制定一个生物安全和牲畜疾病预防指数,这些活动可以在不同的牲畜物种之间进行比较,估计从牲畜生产中获得的收入,并确定影响这些参数的因素。我们使用横断面研究方法,从 CDZ 的 40 个村庄中收集了牛(N=382)、绵羊、山羊(N=303)和乡村鸡(N=327)养殖户的牲畜生产和健康数据。我们使用基于调查设计的技术以及 F 统计量、有序和二项式回归来进行数据分析。我们的结果表明,CDZ 地区农民的收入有相当一部分来自于农作物生产(43.2%)和畜牧业生产(23.1%),其余的农民收入则来自于贸易,还有一部分来自于其他亲戚的支持和就业。我们的结果表明,动物健康管理实践、畜群/羊群规模以及农民的经验对动物健康问题的存在有显著影响,特别是与身体、呼吸和消化系统相关的问题。动物健康管理通常以传统方式进行。在不同的牲畜物种养殖场中,牛场(牛的平均 BDPI:45;IQR:35-55)比其他牲畜物种养殖场(即小反刍动物和乡村鸡养殖场)(小反刍动物和乡村鸡 BDPI:10;IQR:0-20)实施了更好的生物安全措施。有趣的是,拥有群体(即单独或多种物种养殖)对农场的生物安全和疾病预防指数没有任何影响。

结论

本研究确定了良好实践的农户,这些发现将有助于设计干预试验,以改善本研究中评估的生产和健康结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/924d/9052491/b9987d6d860a/12917_2022_3175_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验