Epidemiology Section, Department of Production Animal Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.
Centre for Emerging Zoonotic and Parasitic Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Sandringham, South Africa.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Sep;69(5):e1899-e1912. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14525. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
Biosecurity measures have been introduced to limit economic losses and zoonotic exposures to humans by preventing and controlling animal diseases. However, they are implemented on individual farms with varying frequency. The goal of this study was to evaluate which biosecurity measures were used by farmers to prevent infectious diseases in ruminant livestock and to identify factors that influenced these decisions. We conducted a survey in 264 ruminant livestock farmers in a 40,000 km area in the Free State and Northern Cape provinces of South Africa. We used descriptive statistics, to characterize biosecurity measures and farm attributes, then multivariable binomial regression to assess the strength of the association between the attributes and the implementation of biosecurity measures including property fencing, separate equipment use on different species, separate rearing of species, isolation of sick animals, isolation of pregnant animals, quarantine of new animals, animal transport cleaning, vaccination, tick control and insect control. Ninety-nine percent of farmers reported using at least one of the 10 biosecurity measures investigated (median [M]: 6; range: 0-10). The most frequently used biosecurity measures were tick control (81%, 214 out of 264), vaccination (80%, 211 out of 264) and isolation of sick animals (72%, 190 out of 264). More biosecurity measures were used on farms with 65-282 animals (M: 6; odds ratio [OR]: 1.52) or farms with 283-12,030 animals (M: 7; OR: 1.87) than on farms with fewer than 65 animals (M: 4). Furthermore, farmers who kept two animal species (M: 7; OR: 1.41) or three or more species (M: 7) used more biosecurity measures than single-species operations (M: 4). Farmers with privately owned land used more biosecurity measures (M: 6; OR: 1.51) than those grazing their animals on communal land (M: 3.5). Farms that reported previous Rift Valley fever (RVF) outbreaks used more biosecurity measures (M: 7; OR: 1.25) compared with farms without RVF reports (M: 6) and those that purchased animals in the 12 months prior to the survey (M: 7; OR: 1.19) compared with those that did not (M: 6). When introducing new animals into their herds (n = 122), most farmers used fewer biosecurity measures than they did for their existing herd: 34% (41 out of 122) used multiple biosecurity measures like those of vaccination, tick control, quarantine or antibiotic use, whereas 36% (44 out of 122) used only one and 30% (37 out of 122) used none. Certain farm features, primarily those related to size and commercialization, were associated with more frequent use of biosecurity measures. Given the variation in the application of biosecurity measures, more awareness and technical assistance are needed to support the implementation of a biosecurity management plan appropriate for the type of farm operation and available resources.
生物安全措施已被引入,以通过预防和控制动物疾病来限制经济损失和人畜共患疾病的暴露。然而,这些措施是在不同频率的个体农场实施的。本研究的目的是评估农民采用了哪些生物安全措施来预防反刍动物的传染病,并确定影响这些决策的因素。我们在南非自由州和北开普省的一个 40,000 平方公里的地区对 264 名反刍动物养殖户进行了调查。我们使用描述性统计来描述生物安全措施和农场属性,然后使用多变量二项式回归来评估属性与生物安全措施实施之间的关联强度,包括财产围栏、不同物种使用单独的设备、不同物种分开饲养、病畜隔离、孕畜隔离、新动物隔离、动物运输清洁、疫苗接种、蜱控制和昆虫控制。99%的农民报告至少使用了 10 种调查的生物安全措施之一(中位数[M]:6;范围:0-10)。最常使用的生物安全措施是蜱控制(81%,214 名 264 名)、疫苗接种(80%,211 名 264 名)和病畜隔离(72%,190 名 264 名)。在拥有 65-282 头动物的农场(M:6;优势比[OR]:1.52)或拥有 283-12,030 头动物的农场(M:7;OR:1.87)比拥有少于 65 头动物的农场(M:4)使用更多的生物安全措施。此外,饲养两种动物物种(M:7;OR:1.41)或三种或更多种动物的农民(M:7)比单一种群操作(M:4)使用更多的生物安全措施。拥有私人土地的农民使用了更多的生物安全措施(M:6;OR:1.51)比在公共土地上放牧的农民(M:3.5)。报告过裂谷热(RVF)暴发的农场比没有 RVF 报告的农场(M:6)和在调查前 12 个月购买动物的农场(M:7;OR:1.19)使用了更多的生物安全措施(M:7;OR:1.25)。当向其畜群中引入新动物时(n=122),大多数农民使用的生物安全措施比其现有畜群少:34%(41 名 122 名)使用了疫苗接种、蜱控制、隔离或抗生素使用等多种生物安全措施,而 36%(44 名 122 名)仅使用了一种,30%(37 名 122 名)没有使用任何措施。一些农场特征,主要是与规模和商业化相关的特征,与更频繁地使用生物安全措施有关。鉴于生物安全措施的应用存在差异,需要更多的意识和技术援助来支持实施适合农场运营类型和可用资源的生物安全管理计划。