Emergency Medicine Department, HUMANITAS Gradenigo, C.so Regina Margherita 8, 10132, Turin, Italy.
Intensive Care Unit, HUMANITAS Gradenigo, Turin, Italy.
Crit Care. 2022 Apr 29;26(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03937-x.
Whether prone position (PP) improves clinical outcomes in COVID-19 pneumonia treated with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is unknown. We evaluated the effect of early PP on 28-day NIV failure, intubation and death in noninvasively ventilated patients with moderate-to-severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia and explored physiological mechanisms underlying treatment response.
In this controlled non-randomized trial, 81 consecutive prospectively enrolled patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and moderate-to-severe (paO2/FiO2 ratio < 200) acute hypoxemic respiratory failure treated with early PP + NIV during Dec 2020-May 2021were compared with 162 consecutive patients with COVID-19 pneumonia matched for age, mortality risk, severity of illness and paO2/FiO2 ratio at admission, treated with conventional (supine) NIV during Apr 2020-Dec 2020 at HUMANITAS Gradenigo Subintensive Care Unit, after propensity score adjustment for multiple baseline and treatment-related variables to limit confounding. Lung ultrasonography (LUS) was performed at baseline and at day 5. Ventilatory parameters, physiological dead space indices (DSIs) and circulating inflammatory and procoagulative biomarkers were monitored during the initial 7 days.
In the intention-to-treat analysis. NIV failure occurred in 14 (17%) of PP patients versus 70 (43%) of controls [HR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.21-0.50; p < 0.0001]; intubation in 8 (11%) of PP patients versus 44 (30%) of controls [HR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.18-0.55; p = 0.0012], death in 10 (12%) of PP patients versus 59 (36%) of controls [HR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.44; p < 0.0001]. The effect remained significant within different categories of severity of hypoxemia (paO2/FiO2 < 100 or paO2/FiO2 100-199 at admission). Adverse events were rare and evenly distributed. Compared with controls, PP therapy was associated with improved oxygenation and DSIs, reduced global LUS severity indices largely through enhanced reaeration of dorso-lateral lung regions, and an earlier decline in inflammatory markers and D-dimer. In multivariate analysis, day 1 CO2 response outperformed O2 response as a predictor of LUS changes, NIV failure, intubation and death.
Early prolonged PP is safe and is associated with lower NIV failure, intubation and death rates in noninvasively ventilated patients with COVID-19-related moderate-to-severe hypoxemic respiratory failure. Early dead space reduction and reaeration of dorso-lateral lung regions predicted clinical outcomes in our study population.
ISRCTN23016116 . Retrospectively registered on May 1, 2021.
俯卧位(PP)是否能改善 COVID-19 肺炎患者接受无创通气(NIV)治疗的临床结局尚不清楚。我们评估了早期 PP 对中重度急性低氧性呼吸衰竭 COVID-19 肺炎患者 28 天 NIV 失败、插管和死亡的影响,并探讨了治疗反应的生理机制。
在这项对照非随机试验中,2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 5 月期间,81 例连续前瞻性纳入的 COVID-19 肺炎患者,接受早期 PP+NIV 治疗,这些患者的中重度(氧分压/吸氧浓度比<200)急性低氧性呼吸衰竭,与 162 例连续 COVID-19 肺炎患者进行匹配,这些患者在 2020 年 4 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在 HUMANITAS Gradenigo 亚重症监护病房接受常规(仰卧位)NIV 治疗,在进行倾向性评分调整以限制混杂因素后,对多个基线和治疗相关变量进行匹配。在基线和第 5 天进行肺部超声(LUS)检查。在最初的 7 天内监测通气参数、生理死腔指数(DSI)和循环炎症及促凝生物标志物。
意向治疗分析中,PP 组患者 NIV 失败 14 例(17%),对照组患者 NIV 失败 70 例(43%)[风险比=0.32,95%置信区间 0.21-0.50;p<0.0001];PP 组患者插管 8 例(11%),对照组患者插管 44 例(30%)[风险比=0.31,95%置信区间 0.18-0.55;p=0.0012];PP 组患者死亡 10 例(12%),对照组患者死亡 59 例(36%)[风险比=0.27,95%置信区间 0.17-0.44;p<0.0001]。在不同严重程度低氧血症(入院时氧分压/吸氧浓度比<100 或 100-199)患者中,这种效果仍然显著。不良事件少见且分布均匀。与对照组相比,PP 治疗与更好的氧合和 DSI 相关,通过增强背侧和外侧肺区域的再充气,显著降低整体 LUS 严重程度指数,同时炎症标志物和 D-二聚体更早下降。在多变量分析中,第 1 天 CO2 反应作为 LUS 变化、NIV 失败、插管和死亡的预测指标优于 O2 反应。
早期长时间 PP 是安全的,可降低 COVID-19 相关中重度急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者的 NIV 失败、插管和死亡率。在我们的研究人群中,早期死腔减少和背侧和外侧肺区域的再充气可预测临床结局。
ISRCTN23016116。于 2021 年 5 月 1 日回顾性注册。