• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2016 至 2018 年美国国家住院患者样本中老年烧伤患者院内死亡率的预后因素。

Prognostic Factors for In-Hospital Mortality of Geriatric Burns From the US National Inpatient Sample 2016 to 2018.

机构信息

Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic & Reconstruction Surgery, University of Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2022 Jul 1;43(4):772-780. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irac045.

DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irac045
PMID:35488365
Abstract

Older adults with an acute burn experience a high frequency of in-hospital mortality. However, traditional burn mortality prediction models are less accurate for older adults likely because they do not account for geriatric specific factors, such as frailty. This study aims to investigate the impact of frailty on in-hospital mortality in older adult burn patients. Patients ≥50 years of age with an acute burn diagnosis in the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2018) were included in the cohort. Three multivariable logistic regression models to predict in-hospital mortality were generated and compared. The models were 1) age and percent total body surface area, 2) age, percent total body surface area and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and 3) age, percent total body surface area, and Hospital Frailty Risk Score. A total of 60,515 weighted discharges were included in the cohort. In-hospital mortality increased with age, as 3.3% of 50- to 64-year-olds, 5.3% of 65- to 74-year-olds, 6.6% of 75- to 84-year-olds, and 9.9% of ≥85-year-olds died during the acute burn admission (P < .001). The multivariable model that included Hospital Frailty Risk Score had a higher area under the receiver operating characteristics curve than the model with age and percent total body surface area (0.84 vs 0.79; P < .001) and the model with Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (0.84 vs 0.83; P = .013). Frailty improved prediction of in-hospital mortality for older adult acute burn patients and burn specialists should consider implementing a frailty instrument to evaluate older adults with an acute burn injury.

摘要

老年急性烧伤患者住院病死率较高。然而,传统的烧伤病死率预测模型对老年人的预测准确性较低,可能是因为这些模型没有考虑到老年人特有的因素,如衰弱。本研究旨在探讨衰弱对老年烧伤患者住院病死率的影响。纳入国家住院患者样本(2016-2018 年)中年龄≥50 岁且有急性烧伤诊断的患者。共纳入了 60515 例加权出院患者。随着年龄的增长,住院病死率逐渐升高,50-64 岁患者的病死率为 3.3%,65-74 岁患者的病死率为 5.3%,75-84 岁患者的病死率为 6.6%,≥85 岁患者的病死率为 9.9%(P<0.001)。包含医院衰弱风险评分的多变量模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积高于包含年龄和总体表百分比的模型(0.84 比 0.79;P<0.001)和包含 Elixhauser 合并症指数的模型(0.84 比 0.83;P=0.013)。衰弱改善了对老年急性烧伤患者住院病死率的预测,烧伤专家应考虑使用衰弱工具来评估急性烧伤的老年患者。

相似文献

1
Prognostic Factors for In-Hospital Mortality of Geriatric Burns From the US National Inpatient Sample 2016 to 2018.2016 至 2018 年美国国家住院患者样本中老年烧伤患者院内死亡率的预后因素。
J Burn Care Res. 2022 Jul 1;43(4):772-780. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irac045.
2
Frailty: an independent predictor of burns mortality following in-patient admission.衰弱:住院后烧伤死亡率的独立预测因素。
Burns. 2018 Dec;44(8):1895-1902. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
3
Frailty score on admission predicts outcomes in elderly burn injury.入院时的衰弱评分可预测老年烧伤患者的预后。
J Burn Care Res. 2015 Jan-Feb;36(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000190.
4
Factors Predicting 90-Day Readmissions for US Older Adult Burn Patients From the 2016-2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database.预测美国老年烧伤患者 90 天再入院的因素:来自 2016-2018 年全国再入院数据库的分析。
J Burn Care Res. 2024 May 6;45(3):709-718. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irae020.
5
Long term mortality in critically ill burn survivors.重症烧伤幸存者的长期死亡率。
Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1155-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
6
Predictors of mortality and validation of burn mortality prognostic scores in a Malaysian burns intensive care unit.马来西亚烧伤重症监护病房死亡率的预测因素及烧伤死亡率预后评分的验证
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Nov 7;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0284-8.
7
[Establishment of an early risk prediction model for bloodstream infection and analysis of its predictive value in patients with extremely severe burns].[建立血流感染早期风险预测模型并分析其在特重度烧伤患者中的预测价值]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 20;37(6):530-537. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210114-00021.
8
Revised Baux Score and updated Charlson comorbidity index are independently associated with mortality in burns intensive care patients.修订后的 Baux 评分和更新后的 Charlson 合并症指数与烧伤重症监护患者的死亡率独立相关。
Burns. 2015 Nov;41(7):1420-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
9
Predictors of Discharge Disposition in Older Adults With Burns: A Study of the Burn Model Systems.老年烧伤患者出院处置的预测因素:烧伤模型系统研究
J Burn Care Res. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):607-12. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000216.
10
No Difference in Morbidity or Mortality Between Octogenarians and Other Geriatric Burn Trauma Patients.八旬老人与其他老年烧伤创伤患者在发病率和死亡率方面无差异。
Am Surg. 2022 Dec;88(12):2907-2912. doi: 10.1177/00031348211011122. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Predicting 90-Day Readmissions for US Older Adult Burn Patients From the 2016-2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database.预测美国老年烧伤患者 90 天再入院的因素:来自 2016-2018 年全国再入院数据库的分析。
J Burn Care Res. 2024 May 6;45(3):709-718. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irae020.
2
Frailty as a predictor of adverse outcomes in burn patients: a systematic review.衰弱作为烧伤患者不良结局的预测指标:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04302-5.