• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1064nm 皮秒激光单独及联合应用于皮秒 1064nm 激光治疗纹身的疗效。

Outcomes of 1064-nm picosecond laser alone and in combination with fractional 1064-nm picosecond laser in tattoo removal.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Chulabhorn International College of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Samitivej Esthetic Institute, Samitivej Sukhumvit Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Jul;21(7):2832-2839. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15031. Epub 2022 May 16.

DOI:10.1111/jocd.15031
PMID:35488471
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Removal of the unwanted tattoo was initially focused treatment of picosecond laser in the setting of the unfractionated beam, whereas the fractionated 1064-nm picosecond lasers (Fr-Pico) has been successfully utilized in various skin conditions, including scar and benign pigmented lesions. However, no studies compared the combination of Fr-Pico and unfractional 1064-nm picosecond laser (UFr-Pico) and UFr-Pico alone in tattoo removal.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of Fr-Pico and UFr-Pico and the UFr-Pico and in tattoo removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen black tattoos in 11 patients were treated with UFr-Pico on one half and in combination with Fr-Pico on another half over three sessions with 4-week intervals and 4-week follow-up after the last session. Treatment efficacy was assessed using digital photographs, skin imaging analysis, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

After three treatments, tattoo clearance scores revealed that greater than 50% clearance was achieved in 11 (84.6%) tattoos treated with combination side and 9 (69.2%) tattoos with UFr-Pico alone. Significant differences were observed between the groups at 8 and 12 weeks. Skin textural changes also demonstrated significant improvements in the combination side at Week 12. Adverse events, such as blistering and textural changes, were fewer in the combination side.

CONCLUSION

The combination of 1064 nm Fr-Pico and UFr-Pico may be more effective and safer in tattoo removal than UFr-Pico alone.

摘要

背景

最初,去除不需要的纹身主要集中在非分段光束的皮秒激光治疗上,而分段 1064nm 皮秒激光(Fr-Pico)已成功应用于各种皮肤状况,包括疤痕和良性色素病变。然而,目前尚无研究比较 Fr-Pico 联合非分段 1064nm 皮秒激光(UFr-Pico)与单纯 UFr-Pico 在纹身去除中的疗效。

目的

本研究旨在比较 Fr-Pico 联合 UFr-Pico 与单纯 UFr-Pico 在纹身去除中的疗效和安全性。

材料和方法

11 名患者的 19 个黑色纹身,每半部分分别采用 UFr-Pico 和 Fr-Pico 联合治疗,每半部分治疗 3 次,间隔 4 周,末次治疗后 4 周进行随访。采用数字照片、皮肤成像分析和患者满意度评估治疗效果。

结果

经过 3 次治疗后,根据纹身清除评分,联合治疗组有 11 个(84.6%)纹身和 UFr-Pico 单独治疗组的 9 个(69.2%)纹身达到>50%的清除率。组间在 8 周和 12 周时差异具有统计学意义。在 12 周时,皮肤纹理变化也显示联合治疗组有显著改善。联合治疗组的不良反应(如水疱和纹理改变)较少。

结论

1064nm Fr-Pico 联合 UFr-Pico 治疗纹身比单纯 UFr-Pico 治疗更有效、更安全。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of 1064-nm picosecond laser alone and in combination with fractional 1064-nm picosecond laser in tattoo removal.1064nm 皮秒激光单独及联合应用于皮秒 1064nm 激光治疗纹身的疗效。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Jul;21(7):2832-2839. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15031. Epub 2022 May 16.
2
Analysis of incidence of bulla formation after tattoo treatment using the combination of the picosecond Alexandrite laser and fractionated CO2 ablation.使用皮秒翠绿宝石激光和分次二氧化碳消融联合治疗纹身术后水疱形成发生率的分析
Dermatol Surg. 2015 Feb;41(2):242-5. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000244.
3
Perfluorodecalin-infused patch in picosecond and Q-switched laser-assisted tattoo removal: Safety in Fitzpatrick IV-VI skin types.全氟萘烷注入贴片用于皮秒和调Q激光辅助纹身去除: Fitzpatrick IV-VI型皮肤的安全性
Lasers Surg Med. 2019 Jan;51(1):23-26. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23022. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
4
Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) 1064-nm picosecond laser vs. Nd:YAG 1064-nm nanosecond laser in tattoo removal: a randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial.掺钕钇铝石榴石(Nd:YAG)1064nm 皮秒激光与 Nd:YAG 1064nm 纳秒激光治疗纹身的比较:一项随机对照单盲临床试验。
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Feb;176(2):457-464. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14962. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Tattoo Removal Using a Dual-Wavelength 1064/532-nm Picosecond Laser in Patients With Fitzpatrick Skin Type III and IV.在 Fitzpatrick 皮肤类型 III 和 IV 的患者中使用双波长 1064/532nm 皮秒激光去除纹身的安全性和疗效。
Lasers Surg Med. 2021 Sep;53(7):939-945. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23333. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
6
Comparative study of 1064 nm nanosecond, 1064 nm picosecond, 755 nm, and 595 nm lasers for tattoo removal: An essential role by macrophage.1064纳米纳秒、1064纳米皮秒、755纳米和595纳米激光用于纹身去除的比较研究:巨噬细胞的重要作用
Lasers Surg Med. 2022 Jul;54(5):737-746. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23535. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
7
Accelerated tattoo removal with acoustic shock wave therapy in conjunction with a picosecond laser.联合皮秒激光,采用声冲击波疗法加速纹身去除。
Lasers Surg Med. 2018 Sep;50(9):890-892. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22945. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
8
Laser removal of tattoos.激光去除纹身
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2001;2(1):21-5. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200102010-00004.
9
Picosecond lasers for tattoo removal: a systematic review.用于纹身去除的皮秒激光:一项系统评价
Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Sep;31(7):1397-405. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2001-0. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
10
The efficacy and the adverse reactions of laser-assisted tattoo removal - a prospective split study using nanosecond and picosecond lasers.激光辅助去除纹身的疗效和不良反应 - 使用纳秒和皮秒激光的前瞻性分割研究。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Feb;36(2):305-312. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17674. Epub 2021 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements in Laser Therapies for Dermal Hyperpigmentation in Skin of Color: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Experience of Sequential Laser Treatments in a Cohort of 122 Indian Patients.激光治疗色素沉着皮肤的进展:一项针对122名印度患者的综合文献综述及序贯激光治疗经验
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 5;13(7):2116. doi: 10.3390/jcm13072116.
2
An update on fractional picosecond laser treatment: histology and clinical applications.分秒激光治疗的最新进展:组织学和临床应用。
Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Jan 20;38(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03704-y.