Center for Transformative Geriatric Research, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Roger C. Lipitz Center for Integrated Health Care, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Aug;70(8):2320-2329. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17827. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
Care at the end of life is commonly fragmented; however, little is known about commonly used measures of fragmentation of care in the last year of life (LYOL). We sought to understand differences in fragmentation of care by dementia status among seriously ill older adults in the LYOL.
We analyzed data from adults ≥65 years in the National Health and Aging Trends Study who died and had linked 2011-2017 Medicare fee-for-service claims for ≥12 months before death. We categorized older adults as having serious illness due to dementia (hereafter dementia), non-dementia serious illness or no serious illness. For outpatient fragmentation, we calculated the Bice-Boxerman continuity of care index (COC), which measures care concentration, and the known provider of care index (KPC), which measures the proportion of clinicians who were previously seen. For acute care fragmentation, we divided the number of hospitals and emergency departments visited by the total number of visits. We built separate multivariable quantile regression models for each measure of fragmentation.
Of 1793 older adults, 42% had dementia, 53% non-dementia serious illness and 5% neither. Older adults with dementia had fewer hospitalizations than older adults with non-dementia serious illness but more than older adults without serious illness (mean 1.9 vs 2.3 vs 1, p = 0.002). In adjusted models, compared to older adults with non-dementia serious illness, those with dementia had significantly less fragmented care across all quantiles of COC (range 0.016-0.110) but a lower predicted 90th percentile of KPC, meaning more older adults with dementia had extremely fragmented care on the KPC measure. There was no significant difference in acute care fragmentation.
In the LYOL, older adults with dementia have fewer healthcare encounters and less fragmentation of care by the COC index than older adults with non-dementia serious illness.
生命末期的护理通常是碎片化的;然而,对于生命最后一年(LYOL)护理碎片化的常用衡量标准知之甚少。我们试图了解 LYOL 中患有痴呆症的重病老年人的护理碎片化差异。
我们分析了国家健康老龄化趋势研究中≥65 岁的成年人的数据,这些成年人在死亡前≥12 个月有 Medicare 按服务收费的 2011-2017 年的相关链接记录。我们将老年人分为患有痴呆症的严重疾病(以下简称痴呆症)、非痴呆症严重疾病或无严重疾病。对于门诊护理碎片化,我们计算了 Bice-Boxerman 连续性护理指数(COC),该指数衡量护理的集中程度,以及已知的护理提供者指数(KPC),该指数衡量之前见过的临床医生的比例。对于急性护理碎片化,我们将就诊医院和急诊部门的数量除以就诊总次数。我们为每个碎片化测量指标分别建立了单独的多变量分位数回归模型。
在 1793 名老年人中,42%患有痴呆症,53%患有非痴呆症严重疾病,5%两者都没有。患有痴呆症的老年人比患有非痴呆症严重疾病的老年人住院次数少,但比没有严重疾病的老年人多(平均值分别为 1.9、2.3 和 1,p=0.002)。在调整后的模型中,与患有非痴呆症严重疾病的老年人相比,患有痴呆症的老年人在 COC 的所有分位数上的护理碎片化程度均显著降低(范围为 0.016-0.110),但 KPC 的预测第 90 百分位数较低,这意味着患有痴呆症的老年人在 KPC 测量上的护理碎片化程度极高。急性护理碎片化没有显著差异。
在 LYOL 中,患有痴呆症的老年人的医疗保健次数比患有非痴呆症严重疾病的老年人少,COC 指数衡量的护理碎片化程度也较低。