• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用变异影响的计算机预测因子进行基因组解读。

Genome interpretation using in silico predictors of variant impact.

机构信息

Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

出版信息

Hum Genet. 2022 Oct;141(10):1549-1577. doi: 10.1007/s00439-022-02457-6. Epub 2022 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00439-022-02457-6
PMID:35488922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9055222/
Abstract

Estimating the effects of variants found in disease driver genes opens the door to personalized therapeutic opportunities. Clinical associations and laboratory experiments can only characterize a tiny fraction of all the available variants, leaving the majority as variants of unknown significance (VUS). In silico methods bridge this gap by providing instant estimates on a large scale, most often based on the numerous genetic differences between species. Despite concerns that these methods may lack reliability in individual subjects, their numerous practical applications over cohorts suggest they are already helpful and have a role to play in genome interpretation when used at the proper scale and context. In this review, we aim to gain insights into the training and validation of these variant effect predicting methods and illustrate representative types of experimental and clinical applications. Objective performance assessments using various datasets that are not yet published indicate the strengths and limitations of each method. These show that cautious use of in silico variant impact predictors is essential for addressing genome interpretation challenges.

摘要

评估疾病驱动基因中发现的变异的影响为个性化治疗机会打开了大门。临床关联和实验室实验只能描述所有可用变异的一小部分,而将大多数变异归类为意义不明的变异(VUS)。计算方法通过大规模提供即时估计来弥补这一差距,这些估计通常基于物种之间的大量遗传差异。尽管人们担心这些方法在个体受试者中可能缺乏可靠性,但它们在队列中的大量实际应用表明,当在适当的规模和背景下使用时,它们已经很有帮助,并且在基因组解释中发挥了作用。在这篇综述中,我们旨在深入了解这些变异效应预测方法的训练和验证,并举例说明具有代表性的实验和临床应用类型。使用尚未公布的各种数据集进行的客观性能评估表明了每种方法的优缺点。这些结果表明,谨慎使用计算方法变异影响预测器对于解决基因组解释挑战至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a97c/9522684/8f683ceffd4e/439_2022_2457_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a97c/9522684/8f683ceffd4e/439_2022_2457_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a97c/9522684/8f683ceffd4e/439_2022_2457_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Genome interpretation using in silico predictors of variant impact.使用变异影响的计算机预测因子进行基因组解读。
Hum Genet. 2022 Oct;141(10):1549-1577. doi: 10.1007/s00439-022-02457-6. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
2
Leveraging splice-affecting variant predictors and a minigene validation system to identify Mendelian disease-causing variants among exon-captured variants of uncertain significance.利用剪接影响变异预测因子和微基因验证系统,在意义不确定的外显子捕获变异中鉴定孟德尔疾病致病变异。
Hum Mutat. 2017 Nov;38(11):1521-1533. doi: 10.1002/humu.23294. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
3
Structural and functional prediction, evaluation, and validation in the post-sequencing era.测序后时代的结构与功能预测、评估及验证
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023 Dec 25;23:446-451. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.12.031. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Evaluation of in silico algorithms for use with ACMG/AMP clinical variant interpretation guidelines.评估 ACMG/AMP 临床变异解读指南中使用的计算机算法。
Genome Biol. 2017 Nov 28;18(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1353-5.
5
In Silico Functional Annotation of Genomic Variation.基因组变异的计算机功能注释
Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2016 Jan 1;88:6.15.1-6.15.17. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0615s88.
6
CAGI5: Objective performance assessments of predictions based on the Evolutionary Action equation.CAGI5:基于进化作用方程的预测的客观性能评估。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1436-1454. doi: 10.1002/humu.23873. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
7
Clinical Interpretation of Sequence Variants.序列变异的临床解读。
Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2020 Jun;106(1):e98. doi: 10.1002/cphg.98.
8
InterVar: Clinical Interpretation of Genetic Variants by the 2015 ACMG-AMP Guidelines.InterVar:依据2015年美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)-分子病理学协会(AMP)指南对基因变异进行临床解读
Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Feb 2;100(2):267-280. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
9
Variant Classification Concordance using the ACMG-AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines across Nine Genomic Implementation Research Studies.使用 ACMG-AMP 变异解释指南对九个基因组实施研究进行变异分类一致性评估。
Am J Hum Genet. 2020 Nov 5;107(5):932-941. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.09.011. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
10
Variant Interpretation: Functional Assays to the Rescue.变异解读:功能测定来帮忙。
Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Sep 7;101(3):315-325. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.07.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines for releasing a variant effect predictor.变异效应预测器发布指南。
Genome Biol. 2025 Apr 15;26(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03572-z.
2
Identification of novel variants in carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 gene and comparative pathogenicity assessments of CPS1 missense variants following ACMG/AMP-ClinGen recommendation for computational tools.根据美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)/临床基因组资源(ClinGen)针对计算工具的建议,鉴定氨甲酰磷酸合成酶1基因中的新型变异,并对CPS1错义变异进行致病性比较评估。
Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2025 Mar 22;43:101208. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2025.101208. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
DTreePred: an online viewer based on machine learning for pathogenicity prediction of genomic variants.

本文引用的文献

1
EPIMUTESTR: a nearest neighbor machine learning approach to predict cancer driver genes from the evolutionary action of coding variants.EPIMUTESTR:一种最近邻机器学习方法,可预测编码变异的进化作用下的癌症驱动基因。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2022 Jul 8;50(12):e70. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac215.
2
A general calculus of fitness landscapes finds genes under selection in cancers.一种通用的适合度景观演算方法在癌症中找到了受选择作用的基因。
Genome Res. 2022 May;32(5):916-929. doi: 10.1101/gr.275811.121. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
3
Analysis of missense variants in the human genome reveals widespread gene-specific clustering and improves prediction of pathogenicity.
DTreePred:一种基于机器学习的在线基因组变异致病性预测查看器。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2025 Apr 9;26(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12859-025-06113-4.
4
A cellular assay to determine the fusion capacity of MFN2 variants linked to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease of type 2 A.一种用于确定与2A型夏科-马里-图斯病相关的MFN2变体融合能力的细胞试验。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 22;15(1):9971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93702-1.
5
Critical assessment of missense variant effect predictors on disease-relevant variant data.对疾病相关变异数据的错义变异效应预测因子的批判性评估。
Hum Genet. 2025 Mar;144(2-3):281-293. doi: 10.1007/s00439-025-02732-2. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
6
NAVIP: Unraveling the influence of neighboring small sequence variants on functional impact prediction.NAVIP:揭示相邻小序列变异对功能影响预测的影响
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Feb 18;21(2):e1012732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012732. eCollection 2025 Feb.
7
Evaluating predictors of kinase activity of STK11 variants identified in primary human non-small cell lung cancers.评估在原发性人类非小细胞肺癌中鉴定出的STK11变体激酶活性的预测因子。
Hum Genet. 2025 Mar;144(2-3):127-142. doi: 10.1007/s00439-025-02726-0. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
8
Meta-EA: a gene-specific combination of available computational tools for predicting missense variant effects.Meta-EA:一种用于预测错义变异效应的现有计算工具的基因特异性组合。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jan 2;16(1):159. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55066-4.
9
Making sense of missense: challenges and opportunities in variant pathogenicity prediction.理解错义突变:变异致病性预测中的挑战与机遇
Dis Model Mech. 2024 Dec 1;17(12). doi: 10.1242/dmm.052218. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
10
Understanding the heterogeneous performance of variant effect predictors across human protein-coding genes.理解变异效应预测因子在人类蛋白质编码基因中的异质性表现。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 30;14(1):26114. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76202-6.
分析人类基因组中的错义变异揭示了广泛的基因特异性聚类,并提高了致病性预测的准确性。
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Mar 3;109(3):457-470. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
4
Decoding the effects of synonymous variants.解码同义变体的影响。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Dec 16;49(22):12673-12691. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1159.
5
Exome sequencing and analysis of 454,787 UK Biobank participants.外显子组测序和分析 454787 名英国生物银行参与者。
Nature. 2021 Nov;599(7886):628-634. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04103-z. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
6
Rare, Damaging DNA Variants in and Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From Functional Genomics and Large-Scale Sequencing Analyses.罕见的、有害的 DNA 变体与冠状动脉疾病的风险:来自功能基因组学和大规模测序分析的见解。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2021 Oct;14(5):e003399. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.121.003399. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
7
Computational Insights into the Deleterious Impacts of Missense Variants on -Acetyl-d-glucosamine Kinase Structure and Function.计算研究错义变异对 N-乙酰-d-葡萄糖胺激酶结构与功能的有害影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jul 28;22(15):8048. doi: 10.3390/ijms22158048.
8
Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network.使用三轨神经网络准确预测蛋白质结构和相互作用。
Science. 2021 Aug 20;373(6557):871-876. doi: 10.1126/science.abj8754. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
9
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold.利用 AlphaFold 进行高精度蛋白质结构预测。
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7873):583-589. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
10
Improving the efficacy of exome sequencing at a quaternary care referral centre: novel mutations, clinical presentations and diagnostic challenges in rare neurogenetic diseases.提高四级医疗转诊中心外显子组测序的疗效:罕见神经遗传疾病中的新突变、临床表现和诊断挑战。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;92(11):1186-1196. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-325437. Epub 2021 Jun 8.