Wu Wanchun, Ren Kexin, Li Na, Luo Qian, Xu Caigang, Zou Liqun
Department of Medical Oncology of Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Department of Hematology, Hematology Research Laboratory and Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Transl Oncol. 2022 Jul;21:101437. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101437. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
Nasal-type extranodal NK-T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) is a rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The optimal staging system for it remains undefined. In this study, we evaluated different staging systems in 205 patients with nasal-type ENKTL based on a consistent LVDP (L-asparaginase, etoposide, dexamethasone, cisplatin) regimen. All patients were staged by Ann Arbor staging system (AASS) and CA staging system (CASS). Their characteristics, treatment responses, survival outcomes, prognostic factors, and prognostic values of AASS and CASS were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 78 months. All patients received a median 4 cycles of the LVDP chemotherapy. Based on CASS, patients with stages I through IV were more evenly distributed than with AASS, and numbered at 56 (27.3%), 70 (33.2%), 45 (21.9%), and 34 (17.6%), respectively. At the end of therapy, the objective response rate (ORR) was 81.2% for all patients. For all patients, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 61.6% and 67.8%. According to AASS, the 5-year OS of patients with stages Ⅰ through Ⅳ were 77.9%, 61.2%, 60.0%, and 38.7%, respectively (χ²=20.578, p<0.001). Based on CASS, the 5-year OS of patients with stages Ⅰ to Ⅳ were 89.1%, 65.5%, 58.6%, and 45.4%, respectively (χ²=22.973, p<0.001). In ROC analysis of OS, the area under the curve (AUC) for CASS was 0.70 and 0.64 for AASS. CASS was better in discriminating survival than AASS (p = 0.018). In conclusion, the LVDP regimen is effective for nasal-type ENKTL and the CASS has a better prognostic value in survival analysis than the AASS.
鼻型结外NK-T细胞淋巴瘤(ENKTL)是一种罕见的非霍奇金淋巴瘤。其最佳分期系统仍未明确。在本研究中,我们基于一致的LVDP(左旋门冬酰胺酶、依托泊苷、地塞米松、顺铂)方案,对205例鼻型ENKTL患者的不同分期系统进行了评估。所有患者均采用Ann Arbor分期系统(AASS)和CA分期系统(CASS)进行分期。分析了他们的特征、治疗反应、生存结果、预后因素以及AASS和CASS的预后价值。中位随访时间为78个月。所有患者接受的LVDP化疗中位周期数为4个周期。基于CASS,Ⅰ至Ⅳ期患者的分布比基于AASS更为均匀,分别为56例(27.3%)、70例(33.2%)、45例(21.9%)和34例(17.6%)。治疗结束时,所有患者的客观缓解率(ORR)为81.2%。所有患者的5年无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为61.6%和67.8%。根据AASS,Ⅰ至Ⅳ期患者的5年OS分别为77.9%、61.2%、60.0%和38.7%(χ²=20.578,p<0.001)。基于CASS,Ⅰ至Ⅳ期患者的5年OS分别为89.1%、65.5%、58.6%和45.4%(χ²=22.973,p<0.001)。在OS的ROC分析中,CASS的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.70,AASS为0.64。CASS在区分生存方面优于AASS(p = 0.018)。总之,LVDP方案对鼻型ENKTL有效,且在生存分析中CASS比AASS具有更好的预后价值。