Department of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas 3995, Iran.
Department of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas 3995, Iran.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 25;836:155513. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155513. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
Carbon dioxide (CO) is a major greenhouse gas. This study investigated the performance of three common algorithms, namely NIES, ACOS, and Remo Tec (SRFP). These algorithms were compared using GOSAT observation satellite data with reference data obtained from TCCON during the period 2009-2021. According to statistical evaluation, the SRFP and NIES algorithms achieved the lowest and highest correlation values of the 13 year (2009_2021) average of all sites, respectively. The average bias error values of NIES and ACOS was estimated to be less than that of SRFP approximately 0.5 ppm, while the bias within SRFP was of about 2 ppm. Comparing the RMSE and CRMS error values showed that the highest and lowest error values were related to the SRFP and NIES algorithms respectively, which were 0.37-1.67 and ppm 1.46-7.9. The researchers also compared them with monthly time changes based on ground measurements, and observed a time series of CO concentration changes that well matched the trend of gas concentration values at ground stations obtained by NIES algorithm. The results showed that in most cases NIES was an effective algorithm to retrieve carbon dioxide gas concentrations, allowing the researchers to identify the main sources of greenhouse gas emissions in different areas. The clustering result in the study area showed that the continental CO columnar concentration has a specific seasonal cycle, with the maximum and minimum values appearing in winter-early spring and spring-late summer, respectively. In conclusion, cluster analysis can classify the surface CO column concentration values and determine the spatial distribution pattern of CO.
二氧化碳(CO)是一种主要的温室气体。本研究比较了三种常用算法(NIES、ACOS 和 Remo Tec(SRFP))的性能,使用 GOSAT 观测卫星数据与 2009-2021 年期间 TCCON 获得的参考数据进行比较。根据统计评估,在所有站点 13 年(2009_2021)的平均值中,SRFP 和 NIES 算法分别达到了最低和最高的相关性值。NIES 和 ACOS 的平均偏差误差值估计比 SRFP 低约 0.5 ppm,而 SRFP 内的偏差约为 2 ppm。比较 RMSE 和 CRMS 误差值表明,最高和最低误差值分别与 SRFP 和 NIES 算法有关,分别为 0.37-1.67 和 ppm 1.46-7.9。研究人员还根据地面测量结果比较了它们与月时间变化的关系,观察到 CO 浓度变化的时间序列与 NIES 算法获得的地面站气体浓度值趋势非常吻合。结果表明,在大多数情况下,NIES 是一种有效的算法,可以检索二氧化碳气体浓度,使研究人员能够识别不同地区温室气体排放的主要来源。研究区域的聚类结果表明,大陆 CO 柱浓度具有特定的季节性周期,最大值和最小值分别出现在冬末春初和春末夏初。总之,聚类分析可以对地表 CO 柱浓度值进行分类,并确定 CO 的空间分布模式。