• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经骨隧道与缝线锚钉修复急性股四头肌和髌腱断裂的比较:生物力学研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

Transosseous tunnels versus suture anchors for the repair of acute quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of biomechanical studies.

作者信息

Dankert John F, Mehta Devan D, Remark Lindsey H, Leucht Philipp

机构信息

NYU Grossman School of Medicine - NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

NYU Grossman School of Medicine - NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Sci. 2023 Jul;28(4):821-828. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2022.04.001
PMID:35490080
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple techniques have been developed for the repair of acute quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures with the goal of optimizing clinical outcomes while minimizing complications and costs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of transosseous tunnels and suture anchors for the repair of quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using specific search terms and eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis was performed by fixed-effects models for studies of low heterogeneity (I <25%) and random-effects models for studies of moderate to high heterogeneity (I ≥25%).

RESULTS

A total of 392 studies were identified from the initial literature search with 7 studies meeting the eligibility criteria for quadriceps tendon repair and 8 studies meeting the eligibility criteria for patellar tendon repair. Based on the random-effects model for total gap formation and load to failure for quadriceps tendon repair, the mean difference was 8.88 mm (95% CI, -8.31 mm to 26.06 mm; p = 0.31) in favor of a larger gap with transosseous tunnels and -117.25N (95%CI, -242.73N to 8.23N; p = 0.07) in favor of a larger load to failure with suture anchors. A similar analysis for patellar tendon repair demonstrated a mean difference of 2.86 mm (95% CI, 1.08 mm to 4.64 mm; p = 0.002) in favor of a larger gap with transosseous tunnels and -56.34N (95% CI, -226.75 to 114.07N; p = 0.52) in favor of a larger load to failure with suture anchor repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Transosseous tunnels are biomechanically similar to suture anchors for quadriceps tendon repair. Patellar tendon repair may benefit from reduced gap formation after cycling with suture anchor repair, but the load to failure for both techniques is biomechanically similar. Additional studies are necessary to evaluate these and alternative repair techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review and meta-analysis of biomechanical studies, Level V.

摘要

背景

已开发出多种技术用于修复急性股四头肌和髌腱断裂,目的是在优化临床疗效的同时,将并发症和成本降至最低。本研究的目的是评估用于修复股四头肌和髌腱断裂的经骨隧道和缝线锚钉的生物力学特性。

方法

根据系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,使用特定的检索词和纳入标准,对PubMed和Embase数据库进行系统评价。对于低异质性(I<25%)的研究,采用固定效应模型进行Meta分析;对于中度至高度异质性(I≥25%)的研究,采用随机效应模型进行Meta分析。

结果

从初步文献检索中总共识别出392项研究,其中7项研究符合股四头肌肌腱修复的纳入标准,8项研究符合髌腱修复的纳入标准。基于股四头肌肌腱修复中总间隙形成和失效负荷的随机效应模型,平均差异为8.88mm(95%CI,-8.31mm至26.06mm;p=0.31),倾向于经骨隧道形成更大的间隙;平均差异为-117.25N(95%CI,-242.73N至8.23N;p=0.07),倾向于缝线锚钉有更大的失效负荷。对髌腱修复进行的类似分析显示,平均差异为2.86mm(95%CI,1.08mm至4.64mm;p=0.002),倾向于经骨隧道形成更大的间隙;平均差异为-56.34N(95%CI,-226.75至114.07N;p=0.52),倾向于缝线锚钉修复有更大的失效负荷。

结论

对于股四头肌肌腱修复,经骨隧道在生物力学上与缝线锚钉相似。髌腱修复可能受益于缝线锚钉修复循环后间隙形成的减少,但两种技术的失效负荷在生物力学上相似。需要进一步的研究来评估这些技术以及其他替代修复技术。

证据级别

生物力学研究的系统评价和Meta分析,V级。

相似文献

1
Transosseous tunnels versus suture anchors for the repair of acute quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of biomechanical studies.经骨隧道与缝线锚钉修复急性股四头肌和髌腱断裂的比较:生物力学研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Orthop Sci. 2023 Jul;28(4):821-828. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
2
Biomechanical properties of suture anchor repair compared with transosseous sutures in patellar tendon ruptures: a cadaveric study.髌骨肌腱断裂中缝线锚钉修复与经骨缝线修复的生物力学特性:一项尸体研究
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Nov;41(11):2540-4. doi: 10.1177/0363546513500633. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
3
Smaller Gap Formation With Suture Anchor Fixation Than Traditional Transpatellar Sutures in Patella and Quadriceps Tendon Rupture: A Systematic Review.缝线锚定固定比传统经髌腱缝线在髌骨和股四头肌腱断裂中形成更小的间隙:系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2022 Jul;38(7):2321-2330. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
4
Knotless Suture Anchor With Suture Tape Quadriceps Tendon Repair Is Biomechanically Superior to Transosseous and Traditional Suture Anchor-Based Repairs in a Cadaveric Model.在尸体模型中,带缝线带的无结缝合锚钉修复股四头肌肌腱在生物力学上优于经骨和传统缝合锚钉修复。
Arthroscopy. 2017 Jan;33(1):190-198. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.06.027. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
5
Novel Augmentation Technique for Patellar Tendon Repair Improves Strength and Decreases Gap Formation: A Cadaveric Study.用于髌腱修复的新型增强技术可提高强度并减少间隙形成:一项尸体研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Dec;474(12):2611-2618. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5009-7. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
6
Biomechanical Evaluation of Suture Anchor Versus Transosseous Tunnel Quadriceps Tendon Repair Techniques.缝线锚钉与经骨隧道股四头肌肌腱修复技术的生物力学评估
Arthroscopy. 2016 Jun;32(6):1117-24. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.038. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
7
Cortical Button Fixation: A Better Patellar Tendon Repair?皮质纽扣固定:一种更好的髌腱修复方法?
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):2622-2628. doi: 10.1177/0363546516651614. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
8
Similar Outcomes Are Found Between Quadriceps Tendon Repair With Transosseous Tunnels and Suture Anchors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经骨隧道与缝线锚钉修复股四头肌肌腱的效果相似:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Oct 15;5(6):100807. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100807. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Biomechanical Analysis of Patellar Tendon Repair With Knotless Suture Anchor Tape Versus Transosseous Suture.使用无结缝线锚钉带与经骨缝线进行髌腱修复的生物力学分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Oct 2;8(10):2325967120954808. doi: 10.1177/2325967120954808. eCollection 2020 Oct.
10
Biomechanical Evaluation of Suture Anchor versus Transosseous Tunnel Patellar Tendon Repair Techniques.缝线锚钉与经骨隧道髌腱修复技术的生物力学评估
J Knee Surg. 2019 Aug;32(8):825-832. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669790. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A Low-Cost Tensionable Quadriceps Tendon Rupture Repair Using Transosseous Tunnels.一种使用经骨隧道的低成本可张紧股四头肌肌腱断裂修复术。
Arthrosc Tech. 2025 May 12;14(7):103612. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2025.103612. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Quadriceps Tendon Repair Using All-Suture Suture Button Anchors.使用全缝线缝合纽扣锚钉进行股四头肌肌腱修复。
Arthrosc Tech. 2025 May 29;14(7):103649. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2025.103649. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Low Tensile Strength Suture With Transosseous Tunnels and Suture Anchors 5 mm in Diameter or Greater Are Associated With Higher Failure Rates in Primary Patellar Tendon Repair.
采用直径5毫米或更大的经骨隧道和缝线锚钉的低抗拉强度缝线在原发性髌腱修复中与更高的失败率相关。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb 14;6(2):100908. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100908. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Similar Outcomes Are Found Between Quadriceps Tendon Repair With Transosseous Tunnels and Suture Anchors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经骨隧道与缝线锚钉修复股四头肌肌腱的效果相似:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Oct 15;5(6):100807. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100807. eCollection 2023 Dec.