Centre for Philosophy of Science, University of Lisbon, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal; Institute of Philosophy, University of Porto, via Panoramica s/n 4150-564, Porto, Portugal; Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, WC1N 3AR London, UK.
Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science and School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QJ, UK; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR) Program on Brain, Mind, and Consciousness, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Conscious Cogn. 2022 May;101:103320. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103320. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
This paper considers the phenomenology of depersonalisation disorder, in relation to predictive processing and its associated pathophysiology. To do this, we first establish a few mechanistic tenets of predictive processing that are necessary to talk about phenomenal transparency, mental action, and self as subject. We briefly review the important role of 'predicting precision' and how this affords mental action and the loss of phenomenal transparency. We then turn to sensory attenuation and the phenomenal consequences of (pathophysiological) failures to attenuate or modulate sensory precision. We then consider this failure in the context of depersonalisation disorder. The key idea here is that depersonalisation disorder reflects the remarkable capacity to explain perceptual engagement with the world via the hypothesis that "I am an embodied perceiver, but I am not in control of my perception". We suggest that individuals with depersonalisation may believe that 'another agent' is controlling their thoughts, perceptions or actions, while maintaining full insight that the 'other agent' is 'me' (the self). Finally, we rehearse the predictions of this formal analysis, with a special focus on the psychophysical and physiological abnormalities that may underwrite the phenomenology of depersonalisation.
本文考虑了人格解体障碍的现象学,涉及预测加工及其相关的病理生理学。为此,我们首先确定了预测加工的一些机械原理,这些原理对于讨论现象透明性、心理行动和主体自我是必要的。我们简要回顾了“预测精度”的重要作用,以及它如何提供心理行动和现象透明性的丧失。然后,我们转向感觉衰减以及(病理生理)未能衰减或调节感觉精度的现象后果。然后,我们在人格解体障碍的背景下考虑这种失败。这里的关键思想是,人格解体障碍反映了通过假设“我是一个有身体的感知者,但我无法控制我的感知”来解释与世界的感知接触的非凡能力。我们认为,人格解体的个体可能会相信“另一个代理”正在控制他们的思想、感知或行动,同时保持完全的洞察力,即“另一个代理”是“我”(自我)。最后,我们详细阐述了这一形式分析的预测,特别关注可能构成人格解体现象学基础的心理物理和生理异常。