• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国卫生支出效率的时空差异:基于新冠疫情背景的思考。

Spatial and Temporal Differences in the Health Expenditure Efficiency of China: Reflections Based on the Background of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

机构信息

School of Economics, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;10:879698. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.879698. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.879698
PMID:35493397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9051031/
Abstract

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has brought several challenges to China's national health services, causing great risks and uncertainties to people's lives. Considering China's huge population and relatively small medical investment and its good performance in the COVID-19 pandemic, this research utilizes the hybrid meta-frontier model to analyze health expenditure efficiencies of 30 provinces in China from 1999 to 2018 and compares spatial and temporal differences of the efficiencies in regards to regional forward position and national common frontier. The results show an obvious difference in health expenditure efficiency in different provinces along the regional frontier, in which the efficiency gap in the eastern region is the largest. Moreover, the room for improvement in health expenditure efficiency varies from region to region. For the national common frontier, Beijing is the most efficient, while Guizhou is the least. The eastern region owns the most efficient technical level of health expenditure efficiency, and there is a large efficiency distance between it and the western region. The findings offer effective guidance for elevating the expenditure structure and spatial resource allocation of public health and for promoting the equalization of high quality basic medical services.

摘要

新冠疫情爆发给中国国家卫生服务带来了多重挑战,给人们的生活带来了巨大的风险和不确定性。考虑到中国庞大的人口数量、相对较少的医疗投入以及在新冠疫情中的良好表现,本研究利用混合前沿模型,分析了 1999 年至 2018 年中国 30 个省份的卫生支出效率,并比较了区域前沿和国家共同前沿的效率的时空差异。结果表明,不同省份的卫生支出效率沿区域前沿存在明显差异,其中东部地区的效率差距最大。此外,各地区卫生支出效率的提升空间也各不相同。就国家共同前沿而言,北京的效率最高,而贵州的效率最低。东部地区拥有最高的卫生支出效率技术水平,与西部地区存在较大的效率差距。这些发现为提高公共卫生支出结构和空间资源配置,促进高质量基本医疗服务均等化提供了有效指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/442d/9051031/9bf7442519b2/fpubh-10-879698-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/442d/9051031/d0caad03ade5/fpubh-10-879698-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/442d/9051031/019e72362592/fpubh-10-879698-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/442d/9051031/e2974f7dbe08/fpubh-10-879698-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/442d/9051031/9bf7442519b2/fpubh-10-879698-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/442d/9051031/d0caad03ade5/fpubh-10-879698-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/442d/9051031/019e72362592/fpubh-10-879698-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/442d/9051031/e2974f7dbe08/fpubh-10-879698-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/442d/9051031/9bf7442519b2/fpubh-10-879698-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Spatial and Temporal Differences in the Health Expenditure Efficiency of China: Reflections Based on the Background of the COVID-19 Pandemic.中国卫生支出效率的时空差异:基于新冠疫情背景的思考。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;10:879698. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.879698. eCollection 2022.
2
Is the allocation of medical and health resources effective? Characteristic facts from regional heterogeneity in China.医疗资源配置是否有效?来自中国区域异质性的特征事实。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Jun 8;19(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01201-8.
3
Impact of Digital Economy on the Provision Efficiency for Public Health Services: Empirical Study of 31 Provinces in China.数字经济对公共卫生服务提供效率的影响:基于中国 31 个省份的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 14;19(10):5978. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105978.
4
Regional differences of individual and allocation efficiencies of health resources in China.中国卫生资源个体和配置效率的区域差异。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 21;11:1306148. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1306148. eCollection 2023.
5
Efficiency evaluation of urban employee's basic endowment insurance expenditure in China based on a three-stage DEA model.基于三阶段 DEA 模型的中国城镇职工基本养老保险支出效率评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 3;18(3):e0279226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279226. eCollection 2023.
6
Effects of Vertical Fiscal Imbalance on Fiscal Health Expenditure Efficiency-Evidence from China.纵向财政失衡对财政医疗卫生支出效率的影响——来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 23;20(3):2060. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032060.
7
Development, Status Quo, and Challenges to China's Health Informatization During COVID-19: Evaluation and Recommendations.新冠疫情下中国卫生信息化的发展、现状与挑战:评估与建议。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 17;23(6):e27345. doi: 10.2196/27345.
8
The efficiency of provincial government health care expenditure after China's new health care reform.中国新医改后省级政府医疗卫生支出效率
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0258274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258274. eCollection 2021.
9
Regional Differences and Convergence of Inter-Provincial Green Total Factor Productivity in China under Technological Heterogeneity.中国技术异质性下的省际绿色全要素生产率的区域差异与收敛。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 7;19(9):5688. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095688.
10
Cross-Regional Comparative Study on Carbon Emission Efficiency of China's Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on the Meta-Frontier.基于超前沿的中国长江经济带碳排放效率的跨区域比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 20;16(4):619. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040619.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of healthcare efficiency in China: a three-stage data envelopment analysis of directional slacks-based measure.中国医疗保健效率评估:基于三阶段数据包络分析的有向松弛测度方法
Front Public Health. 2024 May 30;12:1393143. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1393143. eCollection 2024.
2
Unveiling spatial disparities in basic medical and health services: insights from China's provincial analysis.揭示基本医疗和卫生服务的空间差异:来自中国省级分析的见解。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10798-3.
3
Pension level, subjective wellbeing, and preference of care model among elderly people: An empirical study based on structural equation modeling.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Policies Based on Patient Satisfaction: A Bibliometric Study.基于患者满意度的卫生政策:一项文献计量学研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 8;9(11):1520. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111520.
2
Technical Efficiency of Maternal Health Services Provision in Public Hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia: A Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis.埃塞俄比亚西北部公立医院孕产妇保健服务提供的技术效率:两阶段数据包络分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Dec 24;13:3135-3146. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S285045. eCollection 2020.
3
Spatial-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of atmospheric environmental efficiency in China.
养老金水平、主观幸福感与老年人的护理模式偏好:基于结构方程模型的实证研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;11:1104556. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1104556. eCollection 2023.
4
Efficiency measurement and spatial spillover effect of provincial health systems in China: Based on the two-stage network DEA model.中国省级卫生系统的效率衡量与空间溢出效应:基于两阶段网络 DEA 模型。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 3;10:952975. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.952975. eCollection 2022.
5
Human Health, Environmental Quality and Governance Quality: Novel Findings and Implications From Human Health Perspective.人类健康、环境质量与治理质量:人类健康视角的新发现与启示。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 24;10:890741. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.890741. eCollection 2022.
中国大气环境效率的时空特征及其影响因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar;28(10):12428-12440. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11128-w. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
4
Real GDP growth rates and healthcare spending - comparison between the G7 and the EM7 countries.实际 GDP 增长率与医疗保健支出——G7 国家和 EM7 国家的比较。
Global Health. 2020 Jul 16;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00590-3.
5
Study of influential factors of provincial health expenditure -analysis of panel data after the 2009 healthcare reform in China.省级卫生支出影响因素研究——2009 年中国医改后面板数据的分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 1;20(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05474-1.
6
Energy Efficiency and Health Efficiency of Old and New EU Member States.欧盟新旧成员国的能源效率与健康效率
Front Public Health. 2020 Jun 9;8:168. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00168. eCollection 2020.
7
Estimating Social Variation in the Health Effects of Changes in Health Care Expenditure.估算医疗支出变化对健康影响的社会差异。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Feb;40(2):170-182. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20904360. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
8
A three-stage DEA-based efficiency evaluation of social security expenditure in China.基于三阶段 DEA 的中国社会保障支出效率评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 11;15(2):e0226046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226046. eCollection 2020.
9
The Dynamic Analysis of the Pollutant Emissions Impact on Human Health in China Industries based on the Meta-Frontier DEA.基于元前沿DEA的中国工业污染物排放对人体健康影响的动态分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Dec 24;8(1):5. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010005.
10
Health expenditure efficiency in rural China using the super-SBM model and the Malmquist productivity index.中国农村卫生支出效率的超 SBM 模型与 Malmquist 生产力指数分析
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jul 19;18(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1003-5.