Zhao Laijun, Wang Yu, Zhang Honghao, Qian Ying, Yang Pingle, Zhou Lixin
Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 334 Jungong Rd, Shanghai, 200093 People's Republic of China.
Environ Dev Sustain. 2023;25(7):7075-7099. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02353-z. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
The COVID-19 prevention and control measures are taken by China's government, especially traffic restrictions and production suspension, had spillover effects on air quality improvement. These effects differed among cities, but these differences have not been adequately studied. To provide more knowledge, we studied the air quality index () and five air pollutants (PM, PM, SO, NO, and O) before and after the COVID-19 outbreak in Shanghai, Wuhan, and Tangshan. The pollution data from two types of monitoring stations (traffic and non-traffic stations) were separately compared and evaluated. We used monitoring data from the traffic stations to study the emission reduction caused by traffic restrictions. Based on monitoring data from the non-traffic stations, we established a difference-in-difference model to study the emission reduction caused by production suspension. The COVID-19 control measures reduced and the concentrations of all pollutants except O (which increased greatly), but the magnitude of the changes differed among the three cities. The control measures improved air quality most in Wuhan, followed by Shanghai and then Tangshan. We investigated the reasons for these differences and found that differences in the characteristics of these three types of cities could explain these differences in spillover effects. Understanding these differences could provide some guidance and support for formulating differentiated air pollution control measures in different cities. For example, whole-process emission reduction technology should be adopted in cities with the concentrated distribution of continuous process enterprises, whereas vehicles that use cleaner energy and public transport should be vigorously promoted in cities with high traffic development level.
中国政府采取的新冠疫情防控措施,尤其是交通管制和停产措施,对空气质量改善产生了溢出效应。这些效应在不同城市之间存在差异,但这些差异尚未得到充分研究。为了提供更多相关知识,我们研究了上海、武汉和唐山在新冠疫情爆发前后的空气质量指数(AQI)以及五种空气污染物(PM₂.₅、PM₁₀、SO₂、NO₂和O₃)。分别对两类监测站点(交通站点和非交通站点)的污染数据进行了比较和评估。我们利用交通站点的监测数据研究交通管制导致的减排情况。基于非交通站点的监测数据,我们建立了双重差分模型来研究停产导致的减排情况。新冠疫情防控措施降低了AQI以及除O₃(其大幅上升)之外的所有污染物浓度,但三个城市的变化幅度有所不同。防控措施对武汉的空气质量改善最为明显,其次是上海,然后是唐山。我们探究了这些差异的原因,发现这三类城市的特征差异可以解释这些溢出效应的差异。了解这些差异可为不同城市制定差异化的空气污染控制措施提供一些指导和支持。例如,对于连续加工企业集中分布的城市,应采用全过程减排技术,而对于交通发展水平较高的城市,应大力推广使用清洁能源的车辆和公共交通。