• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Social Science of Institutional Transformation: Intersectional Change in the Academy.制度转型的社会科学:学术界的交叉性变革
Front Sociol. 2022 Apr 14;7:824497. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.824497. eCollection 2022.
2
Supporting women's research in predominantly undergraduate institutions: Experiences with a National Science Foundation ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Award.在以本科生为主的院校中支持女性科研:美国国家科学基金会“推进机构转型奖”的经验
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 16;13:817269. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.817269. eCollection 2022.
3
Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM.学术界的性别不平等:STEM 领域女性教职员工面临的问题与解决方案。
J Neurosci Res. 2021 Jan;99(1):13-23. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24631. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
4
Gender equity in epidemiology: a policy brief.流行病学中的性别公平:政策简报。
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;35:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
5
U.S. Women Faculty in the Social Sciences Also Face Gender Inequalities.美国社会科学领域的女性教员也面临性别不平等问题。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:792756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.792756. eCollection 2022.
6
Gender Differences in Grant Submissions across Science and Engineering Fields at the NSF.美国国家科学基金会(NSF)资助申请在科学与工程领域中的性别差异
Bioscience. 2020 Jul 29;70(9):814-820. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biaa072. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
Toward intersectional and culturally relevant sex and gender analysis in health research.朝向健康研究中的交叉和文化相关的性与性别分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114459. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114459. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
8
Mapping the Travels of Intersectionality Scholarship: A Citation Network Analysis.绘制交叉性学术研究的传播轨迹:一项引文网络分析
Psychol Women Q. 2020 Jun;44(2):151-169. doi: 10.1177/0361684320902408. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
9
Intersectional equity in health care: assessing complex inequities in primary and secondary care utilization by gender and education in northern Sweden.卫生保健中的交叉公平性:评估瑞典北部性别和教育在初级和二级保健利用方面的复杂不公平现象。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 11;19(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01272-7.
10
Beyond sex and gender difference in funding and reporting of health research.除了健康研究资金投入和报告方面的性别差异之外。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Aug 28;3:6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0050-6. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Postdoctoral researchers' perspectives on working conditions and equal opportunities in German academia.博士后研究人员对德国学术界工作条件和平等机会的看法。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 29;14:1217823. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1217823. eCollection 2023.
2
U.S. Women Faculty in the Social Sciences Also Face Gender Inequalities.美国社会科学领域的女性教员也面临性别不平等问题。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:792756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.792756. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Why so Few, Still? Challenges to Attracting, Advancing, and Keeping Women Faculty of Color in Academia.为何仍然如此之少?吸引、提升和留住学术界有色人种女性教员面临的挑战。
Front Sociol. 2022 Jan 18;6:792198. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.792198. eCollection 2021.
2
The Diversity-Innovation Paradox in Science.科学中的多样性-创新悖论。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 28;117(17):9284-9291. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915378117. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
3
Making gender diversity work for scientific discovery and innovation.实现性别多样性,促进科学发现和创新。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Oct;2(10):726-734. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0433-1. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
4
A Gender Bias Habit-Breaking Intervention Led to Increased Hiring of Female Faculty in STEMM Departments.一项打破性别偏见习惯的干预措施使得 STEMM 系聘用的女性教员有所增加。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2017 Nov;73:211-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
5
Opinion: Gender diversity leads to better science.观点:性别多样性带来更出色的科学成果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Feb 21;114(8):1740-1742. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700616114.
6
Recent trends in the U.S. Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (BSSR) workforce.美国行为与社会科学研究(BSSR)领域劳动力的近期趋势。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 6;12(2):e0170887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170887. eCollection 2017.
7
Incorporating intersectionality into psychology: An opportunity to promote social justice and equity.将交叉性纳入心理学:促进社会公正和平等的机会。
Am Psychol. 2016 Sep;71(6):474-85. doi: 10.1037/a0040323.
8
INTERSECTIONALITY: Mapping the Movements of a Theory.交叉性:描绘一种理论的发展脉络
Du Bois Rev. 2013 Fall;10(2):303-312. doi: 10.1017/S1742058X13000349.
9
Grants to help women climb academic ladder.
Nature. 2001 Oct 25;413(6858):761. doi: 10.1038/35101732.

制度转型的社会科学:学术界的交叉性变革

The Social Science of Institutional Transformation: Intersectional Change in the Academy.

作者信息

Morimoto Shauna A

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Criminology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.

出版信息

Front Sociol. 2022 Apr 14;7:824497. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.824497. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2022.824497
PMID:35495571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9049015/
Abstract

This article examines intersectional praxis as an approach to institutional transformation, arguing that intersectionality is both a catalyst for and outcome of gender equity efforts in the social sciences and other academic STEM fields. As such, approaching gender equity intersectionally can be understood as a way that theory and practice are co-constitutive in social science and hence an important aspect of transforming academic institutions. Through a case study of the US National Science Foundation (NSF) ADVANCE program for gender equity in STEM, I look at the development of ADVANCE from an effort to support women in scientific fields to becoming a program for institutional transformation grounded in an intersectional understanding of women's inequity in the academic labor force. I ask two related questions in the efforts to address gender inequities in STEM. First, what is the relationship between academic institutions (which are simultaneously sites for the discovery of knowledge and gender inequality) and the National Science foundation, as the premier American academic institutional funding agency? Second, how has this relationship, through those working on ADVANCE, fundamentally shifted the understanding of the social scientific tools and strategies necessary to advance equity for women in academia? In looking at these questions, I argue that, beyond women's representation in social sciences and academia broadly, intersectionality is an important scholarly advance in social science that offers a dialectical tool for change.

摘要

本文探讨交叉性实践作为一种制度转型的方法,认为交叉性既是社会科学及其他学术性STEM领域性别平等努力的催化剂,也是其成果。因此,从交叉性角度处理性别平等问题可被理解为社会科学中理论与实践相互构成的一种方式,因而也是学术机构转型的一个重要方面。通过对美国国家科学基金会(NSF)推进STEM领域性别平等的ADVANCE项目的案例研究,我考察了ADVANCE项目的发展历程,它从一个支持科学领域女性的项目,转变为一个基于对学术劳动力中女性不平等的交叉性理解的制度转型项目。在解决STEM领域性别不平等问题的努力中,我提出两个相关问题。第一,作为美国首要的学术机构资助机构,学术机构(既是知识发现的场所,也是性别不平等的场所)与国家科学基金会之间的关系是什么?第二,通过参与ADVANCE项目的人员,这种关系如何从根本上改变了对促进学术界女性平等所需的社会科学工具和策略的理解?在审视这些问题时,我认为,除了女性在社会科学和学术界的广泛代表性之外,交叉性是社会科学中的一项重要学术进展,它提供了一种变革的辩证工具。