Morimoto Shauna A
Department of Sociology and Criminology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Front Sociol. 2022 Apr 14;7:824497. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.824497. eCollection 2022.
This article examines intersectional praxis as an approach to institutional transformation, arguing that intersectionality is both a catalyst for and outcome of gender equity efforts in the social sciences and other academic STEM fields. As such, approaching gender equity intersectionally can be understood as a way that theory and practice are co-constitutive in social science and hence an important aspect of transforming academic institutions. Through a case study of the US National Science Foundation (NSF) ADVANCE program for gender equity in STEM, I look at the development of ADVANCE from an effort to support women in scientific fields to becoming a program for institutional transformation grounded in an intersectional understanding of women's inequity in the academic labor force. I ask two related questions in the efforts to address gender inequities in STEM. First, what is the relationship between academic institutions (which are simultaneously sites for the discovery of knowledge and gender inequality) and the National Science foundation, as the premier American academic institutional funding agency? Second, how has this relationship, through those working on ADVANCE, fundamentally shifted the understanding of the social scientific tools and strategies necessary to advance equity for women in academia? In looking at these questions, I argue that, beyond women's representation in social sciences and academia broadly, intersectionality is an important scholarly advance in social science that offers a dialectical tool for change.
本文探讨交叉性实践作为一种制度转型的方法,认为交叉性既是社会科学及其他学术性STEM领域性别平等努力的催化剂,也是其成果。因此,从交叉性角度处理性别平等问题可被理解为社会科学中理论与实践相互构成的一种方式,因而也是学术机构转型的一个重要方面。通过对美国国家科学基金会(NSF)推进STEM领域性别平等的ADVANCE项目的案例研究,我考察了ADVANCE项目的发展历程,它从一个支持科学领域女性的项目,转变为一个基于对学术劳动力中女性不平等的交叉性理解的制度转型项目。在解决STEM领域性别不平等问题的努力中,我提出两个相关问题。第一,作为美国首要的学术机构资助机构,学术机构(既是知识发现的场所,也是性别不平等的场所)与国家科学基金会之间的关系是什么?第二,通过参与ADVANCE项目的人员,这种关系如何从根本上改变了对促进学术界女性平等所需的社会科学工具和策略的理解?在审视这些问题时,我认为,除了女性在社会科学和学术界的广泛代表性之外,交叉性是社会科学中的一项重要学术进展,它提供了一种变革的辩证工具。